agentleFS
System-Error-WorldwideSystem-Error-Worldwide/the-loop/.agents/skills/audit/SKILL.md

audit

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Compare declared contracts with observed artifacts or behavior, preserve coverage limits and feed evidence-backed drift into the lifecycle. Use for proactive drift, compliance, provenance, release-readiness or contract audits where findings must survive refutation.

194 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use delight, teach-impeccable and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • HK-hubSkill

    delight

    Add moments of joy, personality, and unexpected touches that make interfaces memorable and enjoyable to use. Elevates functional to delightful. Use when the user asks to add polish, personality, animations, micro-interactions, delight, or make an interface feel fun or memorable.

    Also in 32 projects that use this

  • HK-hubSkill

    teach-impeccable

    One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.

    Also in 19 projects that use this

  • zwy123zwySkill

    normalize

    将用户随意输入的提示词规范化为结构清晰、便于大模型执行的标准化提示词。适用于需要整理、统一提示词格式时调用。

    Also in 19 projects that use this

  • SkillPilotCHSkill

    level-up

    Eine Automatisierung pro Woche finden, scopen, shippen. Output landet als proposed-Eintrag in cadence.md mit konkreten Implementations-Schritten.

    Also in 12 projects that use this

  • ww-w-aiSkill

    pm-discovery

    PM Agent Team - Automated product discovery, strategy, and PRD generation. Runs PM analysis workflow to produce comprehensive PRD before PDCA Plan phase.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +7 more from HK-hub

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 176 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use for a bounded compliance, consistency, provenance, security, quality or implementation-drift review with an enumerated population and …

    line 19
  2. Distinctive:

    Read authority plus any lease required for evidence and issue writes.

    line 26
  3. Very specific:

    run ID, feeder audit, track and declared asset.

    line 46
  4. Distinctive:

    Every finding must cite the exact contract and observed evidence.

    line 55

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 176 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Audit

Purpose

Provide the complete bundled fallback for feeder.audit. Proactively find drift between declared contracts and observed artifacts or behavior without silently fixing the asset or claiming complete coverage from a sample.

Use when

Use for a bounded compliance, consistency, provenance, security, quality or implementation-drift review with an enumerated population and acceptance contract.

Required inputs

  • Validated run ID or new-run request, declared asset, code or non-code track and audit objective.
  • Declared contracts, requirement IDs, population boundary and coverage method.
  • Observed artifact or environment access and known exclusions.
  • Read authority plus any lease required for evidence and issue writes.
  • Current issues, done gate, budgets and stop controls.

Reject a review that cannot define its population, sample or evidence standard.

Procedure

  1. Enumerate the class of items under review and partition included, excluded and unavailable members.
  2. Map each declared contract to one or more observable checks.
  3. Inspect the declared contracts and actual artifacts independently.
  4. Label coverage complete, bounded, sampled or unverified before drawing conclusions.
  5. Attempt to refute each discrepancy through reproduction and a second reading of its contract.
  6. Record surviving drift with precise evidence, affected requirements, severity and reproduction.
  7. Open or update issues without silently fixing them.
  8. Return a bounded entry packet for Strategize, Test or Resolve; Audit does not advance the lifecycle or claim green.

Output contract

Return:

  • run ID, feeder audit, track and declared asset;
  • audit objective, enumerated population and coverage classification;
  • contract-to-check mapping;
  • passed observations, surviving drift and evidence references;
  • issue references, exclusions and unverified members;
  • bounded entry packet, required authority, next safe action or halt.

Evidence gate

Every finding must cite the exact contract and observed evidence. Exact counts require a complete enumeration and partition. A sampled audit cannot claim population-wide absence. Findings that fail self-refutation are removed from the report.

Track requirements

For the code track, inspect repository state, executable behavior, security and relevant test evidence without modifying it. For the non-code track, inspect source support, calculations, factuality, format, rendered output and review evidence. Both tracks preserve unavailable checks as UNVERIFIED.

Safety and authority

Audit is read-first and non-owning. It does not repair, publish, send or change an external system. Persisting evidence or issues requires runtime preflight and lease authority; any separate repair goes through Build or Resolve.

Self-refutation

Try to reproduce every discrepancy, reread the exact contract and search for legitimate exceptions. Ask whether the coverage supports the claimed scope and discard findings that do not survive.

Halt conditions

Halt on an unbounded population, missing contract, inaccessible required evidence, authority denial, namespace change, stop signal, privacy or security gate, or a conclusion that cannot be distinguished from sampling uncertainty. Report members skipped and why.

Core execution does not require network access or the source checkout. The links below are optional public documentation.

References

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.