starlight-investigate
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Diagnose a reproducible software failure by separating observations from hypotheses, locating the failing boundary, and defining regression evidence. Use when a bug, failed check, production incident, or unexpected behavior needs a root-cause report; modify code only when the user also authorizes a fix.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- frankxai/starlight-agent-skillsword for word, first seen Jul 27, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- frankxai/starlight-agent-skills★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository43 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- adapters/claude.mdCLAUDE.md
- arcanea-mythic-overlaySkill
- frankx-authority-postSkill
- starlight-voiceSkill
- cosmic-code-labSkill
- starlight-autoplanSkill
- starlight-ceo-reviewSkill
- starlight-design-reviewSkill
- starlight-devex-reviewSkill
- starlight-eng-reviewSkill
- starlight-qaSkill
- starlight-shipSkill
- starlight-specSkill
- apod-to-shortSkill
- arxiv-space-paper-to-briefSkill
- cosmic-mythic-overlaySkill
- nasa-image-to-atlas-pageSkill
- rights-check-nasa-esaSkill
- rocket-launch-to-reelSkill
- space-social-repurposerSkill
- coding-challenge-generatorSkill
- explain-like-cosmic-professorSkill
- simulation-lab-builderSkill
- caption-and-hashtagSkill
- nasa-image-to-shortSkill
- rocket-launch-to-youtubeSkill
- social-repurposerSkill
- thumbnail-conceptSkill
- arxiv-paper-to-briefSkill
- claim-verificationSkill
- mission-page-to-summarySkill
- media-studioSkill
- publishing-studioSkill
- software-studioSkill
- template-studioSkill
- world-experience-studioSkill
- affiliate-auditSkill
- agentic-incomeSkill
- capability-foundrySkill
- notion-operating-systemSkill
- payments-mandateSkill
- swarm-queen-coordinationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 31
Run the cheapest discriminating checks first.
- Distinctive: line 33
If a fix is authorized, apply the smallest causal change and run focused plus regression checks.
- Distinctive: line 50
Prefer repository search, focused tests, logs, and read-only platform inspection.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Starlight Investigate
Purpose
Find the smallest evidence-supported explanation for a failure without speculative edits or unrelated cleanup.
When it fires
- A test, build, deployment, API, UI flow, or runtime behavior fails.
- The failure is intermittent and needs boundary isolation.
- The user asks for diagnosis, root cause, or incident analysis.
Inputs
- Expected and observed behavior.
- Reproduction steps, logs, timestamps, environment, and relevant revision.
- Repository instructions and known constraints.
Workflow
- Capture the exact failure and determine whether it reproduces.
- Reduce it to the smallest safe reproduction while preserving the failing condition.
- Trace inputs, state transitions, and outputs across the suspected boundary.
- List competing hypotheses and the observation that would falsify each one.
- Run the cheapest discriminating checks first.
- State the root cause only when evidence rules out plausible alternatives.
- If a fix is authorized, apply the smallest causal change and run focused plus regression checks.
- Record residual uncertainty, monitoring, and rollback needs.
Output contract
Return:
symptomand reproducibility;evidencewith commands, locations, and relevant revisions;hypotheses_testedand falsification results;root_causeornot_yet_proven;impact_boundary;recommended_fixwithout implementation when diagnosis-only;verificationandresidual_risk.
Tools & MCP
Prefer repository search, focused tests, logs, and read-only platform inspection. Redact credentials and personal data. Do not alter production state to make a diagnosis easier.
Quality bar
- Observation, inference, and decision are clearly separated.
- “Could be” is not presented as root cause.
- The reproduction and verification are copyable.
- The proposed fix addresses the causal boundary rather than masking the symptom.
- Unrelated working-tree changes remain untouched.
Example
Input: “The preview works, but the production API returns 415.”
Good output: evidence showing the exact content-type mismatch at the request boundary, alternatives ruled out, a minimal header-validation fix, and focused plus production-preview checks.
Built on SIP — Starlight Intelligence Protocol Vertical: starlight-agent-skills · portable capability layer
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

