pr-watch
Skill927 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Local PR watcher. Monitors CI status, automatically fixes failing checks by reading failure logs and applying targeted fixes, then optionally merges when all checks pass. Local CLI analog to Claude Code's cloud auto-fix feature.
- Installs packages
- Commits and pushes
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
15
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Very specific: line 39
After /triage creates a fix PR and you want to stay in the terminal
- Distinctive: line 40
When you don't have the Claude GitHub App installed for cloud auto-fix
- Very specific: line 44
If you have the Claude GitHub App installed, use cloud auto-fix in Claude Code web or mobile — it survives machine sleep.
- Very specific: line 53
Use @codex review for GitHub-visible review findings, then keep Citadel responsible for local verification, CI log fixes, merge readiness, …
- Very specific: line 55
If .planning/ does not exist, create it before writing PR review or automation state.
- Distinctive: line 57
When Codex has already reviewed the PR, ingest its review output before polling or merging:
- Very specific: line 63
Use --file <review-comments.json> with the same script when working from exported/offline review data.
- Distinctive: line 83
If argument provided: use it directly
- Distinctive: line 85
If no PR found: stop. Output: "No PR found for current branch.
- Distinctive: line 147
Do NOT refactor, expand scope, or fix unrelated issues
- Distinctive: line 148
Run the equivalent check locally when possible to verify before pushing
- Distinctive: line 178
8. Wait 30 seconds for CI to re-trigger.
- Distinctive: line 182
When all checks pass:
- Distinctive: line 194
Ask the user which to do. If they choose a merge strategy:
- Distinctive: line 200
If they choose skip: exit.
- Distinctive: line 231
Do NOT refactor or improve code while fixing CI — minimum viable fix only
- Distinctive: line 232
Do NOT merge automatically without user confirmation
- Distinctive: line 233
Do NOT retry the same fix approach after it already failed once
- Distinctive: line 234
Do NOT silently swallow infrastructure failures as if they're code bugs
- Distinctive: line 235
Do NOT push to main or master directly — fixes always go to the PR branch
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/pr-watch — Local PR Auto-fix
You are the PR watcher. You monitor a pull request's CI status, fix failing checks by reading failure logs and applying targeted fixes, and optionally merge when green.
This is the local CLI analog to Claude Code's cloud auto-fix feature. Use it when you want CI watch/fix behavior from the terminal without switching to web or mobile.
When to Use
Don't use when: monitoring local file changes (use /watch); reviewing code quality (use /review); triaging multiple issues at once (use /triage).
/pr-watch— watch the PR for the current branch/pr-watch 42— watch PR #42 specifically- After
/triagecreates a fix PR and you want to stay in the terminal - When you don't have the Claude GitHub App installed for cloud auto-fix
Cloud Alternative
If you have the Claude GitHub App installed, use cloud auto-fix in Claude Code web or mobile — it survives machine sleep. Toggle Auto fix ON in the PR view. Use /pr-watch for in-terminal sessions.
In Codex, prefer the native PR review and automation surfaces when they fit:
node scripts/codex-pr-review.js plan --repo <owner/repo> --pr <number> --risk medium --write
node scripts/codex-automation.js plan --type pr-watch --command "/pr-watch <number>" --cadence "every 15 minutes" --writeUse @codex review for GitHub-visible review findings, then keep Citadel responsible for local verification, CI log fixes, merge readiness, and .planning/pr-review/ state.
If .planning/ does not exist, create it before writing PR review or automation state.
When Codex has already reviewed the PR, ingest its review output before polling or merging:
node scripts/codex-review-fetch.js --repo <owner/repo> --pr <number> --writeUse --file <review-comments.json> with the same script when working from exported/offline review data.
Inputs
| Input | Source | Required |
| PR number | Argument (e.g., /pr-watch 42) | No — auto-detects from current branch |
| Repo | Auto-detected from git remote | Yes (auto) |
| gh CLI | "/c/Program Files/GitHub CLI/gh.exe" on Windows, gh otherwise | Yes (auto) |
Execution Protocol
Phase 0 — Setup
- Detect gh CLI path:
- Windows:
"/c/Program Files/GitHub CLI/gh.exe" - Other:
gh - Store as
$GH
- Windows:
- Detect repo from
git remote get-url origin. Extractowner/repo. - Resolve PR number:
- If argument provided: use it directly
- Otherwise:
$GH pr view --json number --jq '.number'(PR for current branch) - If no PR found: stop. Output: "No PR found for current branch. Create one first or pass a PR number."
- Fetch PR details:
$GH pr view <number> --repo <owner/repo> --json number,title,url,headRefName,baseRefName,state,mergeable - Print watch summary:
Watching PR #<N>: <title> Branch: <head> → <base> URL: <url> - Initialize:
fix_attempts = 0,max_fix_attempts = 3
Phase 1 — Watch Loop
Repeat until convergence or circuit break:
Step 1.1 — Fetch CI status
$GH pr checks <number> --repo <owner/repo>Parse the output to identify check names, states (pass, fail, pending), and detail URLs.
Step 1.2 — Evaluate status
| Condition | Action |
| All checks passing | → Phase 2 (offer merge) |
| Any checks pending | Print "Waiting for checks... (N pending)". Wait 60 seconds. Loop. |
| Any checks failed | → Step 1.3 (investigate and fix) |
| PR closed or merged | Exit. Print "PR #<N> is already closed/merged." |
Step 1.3 — Fix failing checks
For each failed check:
1. Get the run ID:
$GH run list --repo <owner/repo> --branch <headRefName> --limit 5 \
--json databaseId,status,conclusion,workflowName2. Read failure logs:
$GH run view <run-id> --repo <owner/repo> --log-failed3. Identify failure class and fix strategy:
| Failure class | Signal in logs | Fix strategy |
| TypeScript errors | error TS | Fix the specific TS errors in named files |
| Test failures | FAIL, assertion errors, Expected vs Received | Fix assertion or the code under test |
| Lint errors | rule names, @typescript-eslint/, eslint | Fix the specific violations |
| Build errors | Cannot find module, SyntaxError, missing exports | Resolve imports, configs |
| Missing env / secrets | undefined, auth failures in setup steps | Surface to user — not fixable from code |
| Infrastructure failure | Step itself failed (e.g., actions/checkout), network | Surface to user — not fixable from code |
4. Apply fix:
- Implement the minimum change to resolve the failing check
- Do NOT refactor, expand scope, or fix unrelated issues
- Run the equivalent check locally when possible to verify before pushing
5. Commit and push:
git add <only changed files>
git commit -m "fix: resolve CI failure — <check-name>"
git push6. Increment fix_attempts++
7. Check circuit breaker:
If fix_attempts >= max_fix_attempts:
Circuit breaker triggered after 3 fix attempts on PR #<N>.
Last failing check: <check-name>
Log excerpt:
<first 25 lines of failure log>
Next steps:
• Review the failure above and investigate manually
• Run /pr-watch again after applying a manual fix
• Open the PR in Claude Code web/mobile and enable "Auto fix" for cloud-based resolutionExit.
8. Wait 30 seconds for CI to re-trigger. Print "Fix pushed — waiting for CI to re-run...". Loop to Step 1.1.
Phase 2 — Merge Offer
When all checks pass:
All checks passing on PR #<N>: <title>
Merge options:
squash — squash all commits into one (recommended for fix PRs)
merge — standard merge commit
rebase — rebase commits onto base branch
skip — leave the PR open (merge manually)Ask the user which to do. If they choose a merge strategy:
$GH pr merge <number> --repo <owner/repo> --<squash|merge|rebase> --delete-branchIf they choose skip: exit. The PR is green and ready.
Circuit Breaker Rules
Trigger the circuit breaker and stop the loop when:
fix_attempts >= 3— three attempts without resolving the failure- A fix attempt introduces a new failing check that wasn't failing before
- The failure is in infrastructure (GitHub Actions setup steps, secrets, network) — not fixable from code
- The failure log is empty or unreadable — can't determine root cause
- PR is closed or merged by someone else during the watch
Contextual Gates
Disclosure: "Watching PR [#N]. Will notify on CI changes; may push fix commits if auto-fix is enabled."
Reversibility: amber — may push fix commits to the PR branch; undo with git revert <commit> on the pushed commits
Trust gates:
- Any: monitor-only mode (observe CI status without pushing)
- Familiar (5+ sessions): auto-push fixes; novices should run in monitor-only mode and apply fixes manually
Quality Gates
- Every fix commit is targeted — only changes what's needed to green the check
- Fix commit messages are clear:
fix: resolve CI failure — <check-name> - Never force-push — always regular
git push - Never merge without asking the user first
- Circuit breaker fires at exactly 3 attempts
- Infrastructure and secrets failures surface to user immediately, not silently retried
Anti-Patterns — Do NOT
- Do NOT refactor or improve code while fixing CI — minimum viable fix only
- Do NOT merge automatically without user confirmation
- Do NOT retry the same fix approach after it already failed once
- Do NOT silently swallow infrastructure failures as if they're code bugs
- Do NOT push to
mainormasterdirectly — fixes always go to the PR branch
Fringe Cases
ghnot authenticated: "Rungh auth loginand follow the prompts." Exit.- PR already merged/closed: "PR #
<N>is already closed/merged." Exit cleanly. - No CI checks: Note absence; offer to merge if user confirms.
- gh CLI not installed: Output install instructions (cli.github.com /
brew install gh). - PR branch deleted: Exit cleanly; note branch is gone and auto-fix is unavailable.
Exit Protocol
---HANDOFF---
- Watched PR #<N>: <title>
- Fix attempts: <count> / 3
- Final status: green | circuit-break | user-exited | already-merged
- Checks resolved: <list of check names that went from failing to passing>
- Checks still failing: <list, if circuit-break>
- Reversibility: amber — fix commits pushed to PR branch; undo with `git revert <commit>` per fix commit
---Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- mayankjain1815-commits/CITADEL★ 4100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- elie222/inbox-zero★ 13ksame name
- elie222/rakazo★ 6.5ksame name
- RocketChat/Rocket.Chat.Electron★ 1.7ksame name
- EthanAlgoX/MarketBot★ 65same name
- KrishP147/skills★ 37same name
- airborne12/agent-skills★ 6same name
- lambdamechanic/skills★ 2same name
- robinalexandre/claude-code-kit★ 2same name
- s977043/PlanGate★ 2same name
- Hy0sh/claude-skills★ 1same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository49 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architectSkill
- archonSkill
- ascii-diagramSkill
- autopilotSkill
- costSkill
- create-appSkill
- create-skillSkill
- daemonSkill
- dashboardSkill
- decision-mapSkill
- deploy-stewardSkill
- designSkill
- doc-genSkill
- doSkill
- evolveSkill
- experimentSkill
- fleetSkill
- grillSkill
- housecleanSkill
- improveSkill
- infra-auditSkill
- learnSkill
- live-previewSkill
- loopSkill
- mapSkill
- marshalSkill
- merge-reviewSkill
- organizeSkill
- postmortemSkill
- prdSkill
- qaSkill
- refactorSkill
- researchSkill
- reviewSkill
- scaffoldSkill
- scheduleSkill
- session-handoffSkill
- setupSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- telemetrySkill
- test-genSkill
- triageSkill
- unharnessSkill
- verifySkill
- watchSkill
- wikiSkill
- workspaceSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

