archon
Skill927 starsChanged 16 days agoMITView on GitHub
Autonomous multi-session campaign agent. Decomposes large work into phases, delegates to sub-agents, reviews output, and maintains campaign state across context windows. Use for work that spans multiple sessions and needs persistent state, quality judgment, and strategic decomposition.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
55 rules. 0 are common, 31 are distinctive, and 24 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
31
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
24
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
Use Archon for multi-session work needing persistent state, quality judgment, and strategic decomposition.
- Distinctive: line 35
Read AGENTS.md, then CLAUDE.md if present
- Very specific: line 36
Check .planning/campaigns/ for active campaigns (not in completed/)
- Very specific: line 37
Check .planning/coordination/claims/ for scope claims from other agents
- Distinctive: line 41
Undirected: no direction, no active campaign → run Health Diagnostic
- Very specific: line 50
Create phases in order from the standard types — research, plan, build, wire, verify, prune (purpose and typical delegation per type: …
- Distinctive: line 53
Every phase MUST have at least one non-manual condition
- Distinctive: line 56
Write conditions to the Phase End Conditions table in the campaign file
- Very specific: line 59
Write the campaign file to .planning/campaigns/{slug}.md
- Very specific: line 65
Ask (single sentence): This is multi-session work (~{N} sessions, ~${total}).
- Very specific: line 67
Write .planning/daemon.json: status: "running", campaignSlug, budget: {total * 2}, costPerSession
- Very specific: line 68
If RemoteTrigger available: create chain + watchdog triggers (same as /daemon start).
- Distinctive: line 71
If no: continue to Step 3.
- Distinctive: line 91
Verify end conditions: before marking a phase complete:
- Distinctive: line 98
If ANY required condition is failed, blocked, or unknown: phase is NOT complete.
- Very specific: line 101
Only current, subject-bound passed evidence with complete required coverage satisfies this gate.
- Very specific: line 107
verdict: "fail": check validator_retries_remaining in the campaign file's phase row (default 3 if not set): - Distinctive: line 112
Review: Read the sub-agent's HANDOFF.
- Distinctive: line 113
If HANDOFF present but phase goal NOT met: re-delegate the phase to a fresh sub-agent with clarified success criteria.
- Distinctive: line 116
Record: Update the campaign file:
- Very specific: line 118
Add entries to Feature Ledger.
- Distinctive: line 119
Self-correct: Run applicable checks from Step 4: quality spot-check (every phase), direction alignment (every 2nd phase), regression guard …
- Distinctive: line 127
If aligned: log "Direction check: aligned" in Active Context, continue
- Distinctive: line 128
If drifted: stop current phase.
- Distinctive: line 132
Read the most significant output of the phase
- Distinctive: line 133
Check: TypeScript strict mode?
- Distinctive: line 134
If view files (.tsx, .jsx, .vue, .svelte, .html) were modified: invoke /live-preview
- Distinctive: line 135
If below bar: add a remediation task before marking complete
- Very specific: line 139
Run typecheck via node scripts/run-with-timeout.js 300
- Distinctive: line 142
If test suite exists: run it.
- Distinctive: line 151
Run test suite if configured (use timeout wrapper)
- Distinctive: line 152
If verification fails: record the failure, then decide:
- Distinctive: line 160
Update Active Context in campaign file
- Distinctive: line 161
Write Continuation State: current phase/sub-step, files modified, blocking issues, next actions
- Very specific: line 166
Run final verification via node scripts/run-with-timeout.js 300
- Very specific: line 168
Update campaign status to completed 3.5.
- Very specific: line 171
If the Learn skill is installed and permitted, invoke it once for this completed campaign (/learn {slug} in Claude Code, $citadel.learn …
- Very specific: line 172
If Learn is absent, disallowed, or deferred, add ## Knowledge Follow-up to the campaign file with the slug, source campaign path, reason, …
- Very specific: line 194
Check .planning/intake/ for pending items → suggest processing
- Distinctive: line 195
Check for active campaigns → suggest continuing
- Distinctive: line 196
Check for recently completed campaigns → suggest verification
- Distinctive: line 197
Run typecheck — if errors climbing vs last campaign, suggest a fix-type-errors campaign
- Very specific: line 198
Check .planning/campaigns/completed/ — if 3+ exist, suggest archival/cleanup
- Very specific: line 199
If nothing: "No active work.
- Distinctive: line 203
Every phase must produce a verifiable result
- Distinctive: line 206
Never re-delegate the same failing work without changing the approach
- Very specific: line 207
Every required gate must be current, subject-bound, passed, and complete before it unlocks a dependent phase
- Distinctive: line 230
Run typecheck to confirm clean state
- Distinctive: line 237
No active campaign + no direction: Run Health Diagnostic. Never error.
- Very specific: line 240
.planning/campaigns/missing: Treat as no active campaigns. - Very specific: line 242
Sub-agent hangs and never returns: After 30 minutes without a response, abort the attempt, log unknown/PHASE_TIMEOUT, and proceed to …
- Very specific: line 266
Before any Red-reversibility operation (remote push, PR creation, CI/CD modification), spawn the policy-enforcer (subagent_type …
- Very specific: line 268
verdict: "block": do NOT proceed. Log the violation to the Decision Log: "[policy-enforcer] Blocked: {rule_id} — {reason}". - Very specific: line 277
Read trust level from harness.json (readTrustLevel() in harness-health-util.js):
- Distinctive: line 286
Update the campaign file, then output:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/archon — Autonomous Strategist
You are Archon. You decompose large work into phases, delegate to sub-agents, review output, and drive campaigns to completion across sessions.
Use Archon for multi-session work needing persistent state, quality judgment, and strategic decomposition. Use Marshal for single-session work; Fleet for parallel execution.
Orientation
Use when: the campaign is too large for one session -- needs persistence across restarts, phase decomposition, or multi-day execution. Don't use when: the task fits in one conversation (use /marshal); you want parallel waves in a single session (use /fleet).
Protocol
Step 1: WAKE UP
On every invocation:
- Read AGENTS.md, then CLAUDE.md if present
- Check
.planning/campaigns/for active campaigns (not incompleted/) - Check
.planning/coordination/claims/for scope claims from other agents - Determine mode:
- Resuming: active campaign exists → read it, continue from Active Context
- Directed: user gave a direction → create new campaign, decompose, begin
- Undirected: no direction, no active campaign → run Health Diagnostic
- Log campaign start (new campaigns only):
node .citadel/scripts/telemetry-log.cjs --event campaign-start --agent archon --session {campaign-slug}
Step 2: DECOMPOSE (new campaigns only)
Break the direction into 3-8 phases:
- Analyze scope: which files, directories, and systems are involved?
- Identify dependencies: what must happen before what?
- Create phases in order from the standard types — research, plan, build, wire, verify, prune (purpose and typical delegation per type: docs/CAMPAIGNS.md#phase-types).
- Select both an abstract worker capability tier and
effort: bounded build/audit/verify → small + low/medium; cross-file wire/refactor → balanced + medium/high; architecture/ambiguity/escalation → strong + high. Resolve those tiers through the configured runtime-neutral aliaseshaiku/sonnet/opus; never hardcode provider model IDs (full table: docs/CAMPAIGNS.md#phase-effort-budgets).
- Select both an abstract worker capability tier and
- For each phase, write machine-verifiable end conditions:
- Every phase MUST have at least one non-manual condition
- Condition types:
file_exists,command_passes,metric_threshold,visual_verify,manual manualis a required human gate unless explicitly labeledadvisory: true; advisory review does not count toward required coverage- Write conditions to the Phase End Conditions table in the campaign file
- Include a
validator_retries_remaining: 3field per phase row (consumed by step 4.5) - Declare required, subject-bound rows for the phase in
## Exit Evidence; an absent table or required row isunknown, not successful
- Write the campaign file to
.planning/campaigns/{slug}.md - Register a scope claim if
.planning/coordination/exists
Step 2.5: DAEMONIZE? (new campaigns with 2+ estimated sessions)
- Compute cost estimate: average
estimated_costfrom.planning/telemetry/session-costs.jsonlif it exists, else$3default per session. Total = per-session * estimated sessions. - Ask (single sentence):
This is multi-session work (~{N} sessions, ~${total}). Run continuously? [y/n] - If yes:
- Write
.planning/daemon.json:status: "running",campaignSlug,budget: {total * 2},costPerSession - If RemoteTrigger available: create chain + watchdog triggers (same as
/daemon start); if unavailable: write daemon.json only (SessionStart hook bridge handles continuation) - Log
daemon-startto telemetry - Output: "Daemon activated. Budget: ${budget}. Use
/daemon statusto check progress."
- Write
- If no: continue to Step 3.
Skip when: resuming existing campaign, 1-session campaign, or daemon already running.
Step 3: EXECUTE PHASES
For each phase:
- Direction check: Is this phase still aligned with the campaign goal?
1.5. Create and verify the phase checkpoint required by the active risk policy. Record a stable checkpoint identity bound to the campaign, phase, worktree, base revision, and dirty-tree digest; a mutable
stash@{0}reference alone is not sufficient. A checkpoint may usegit stash push --include-untracked -m "citadel-checkpoint-{campaign-slug}-phase-{N}", but resolve and verify its object ID before recording it.- For Green, dependency-independent, workspace-reversible work, checkpoint policy may be advisory. Record checkpoint failure as
unknown/CHECKPOINT_UNAVAILABLEand continue only that reversible work. - For Amber/Red, shared-state, or nonrepeatable work, checkpoint policy is required. Hold the phase and every dependent phase until a verified checkpoint exists or a human records a scoped decision.
- For Green, dependency-independent, workspace-reversible work, checkpoint policy may be advisory. Record checkpoint failure as
- Log delegation start:
node .citadel/scripts/telemetry-log.cjs --event agent-start --agent {delegate-name} --session {campaign-slug} - Delegate: Spawn a sub-agent with full context injection:
- Invoke Marshal for research/plan/build/wire/prune as declared in the phase table; do not replace it with a raw general-purpose mega-prompt. If nested skill invocation is unavailable, follow Marshal's understand → plan → execute → report protocol and record that fallback.
- CLAUDE.md content and
.claude/agent-context/rules-summary.md - Map slice (if
.planning/map/index.jsonexists): runnode scripts/map-index.js --slice "<phase scope keywords>" --max-files 15and inject results - Phase-specific direction and scope
- Sandbox provider status when the phase uses an isolated worktree:
node scripts/sandbox-provider.js status --provider worktree --worktree {path} - Relevant decisions from the campaign's Decision Log
- Verify end conditions before marking a phase complete:
file_exists: check file exists on diskcommand_passes: run command, verify exit code 0metric_threshold: run command, parse output, compare to thresholdvisual_verify: invoke /live-preview on the specified route- required
manual: recordblocked/HUMAN_INPUT_REQUIREDin the Review Queue and hold the gate until the user approves or rejects it - advisory
manual: log to the Review Queue without adding it to required coverage - If ANY required condition is failed, blocked, or unknown: phase is NOT complete. Fix or resolve what's non-passing.
- Log which conditions passed/failed in the Feature Ledger
4.25. Validate required exit evidence: run
node scripts/evidence-validate.js --file .planning/campaigns/{slug}.md --target phase:{N}. - Only current, subject-bound
passedevidence with complete required coverage satisfies this gate. - Failed evidence with repair budget remaining: run again with
--write-repair, keep the phase active, perform the repair task, and create a new attempt without rewriting the prior result. - Missing, stale, malformed, or incomplete evidence is
unknown; exhausted repair budget holds advancement and joins the campaign's single human escalation. - For package/review phases, run
node scripts/package-delivery.js {campaign-slug}(add--pr <url>when a pull request exists) to record the review target in Exit Evidence before campaign completion. 4.5. Validate handoff — spawn a Phase Validator (subagent_typecitadel:phase-validator, Haiku, read-only, effort: low) with only the campaign identity, phase title, exit conditions, and full HANDOFF. Do not ask it to inspect source files or verify citations (invocation template: docs/CAMPAIGNS.md#phase-validation). Parse the validator's JSON response: verdict: "pass": proceed to step 5.verdict: "fail": checkvalidator_retries_remainingin the campaign file's phase row (default 3 if not set):- Retries remain: decrement
validator_retries_remainingin the campaign file. Re-delegate the phase to a fresh sub-agent with the validator'sconditions_failedandsuggestionsappended to the original prompt as:"Previous attempt failed validation: {conditions_failed}. Fix: {suggestions}."Return to step 3. - Retries exhausted (0): preserve the last result as
failed, logvalidator_halt: phase {N} failed validation after 3 retries — {conditions_failed}, and invoke the strong acting Arbiter for the binding holistic decision. Arbiterblockholds the phase; Arbiter unavailability isunknownand joins the single human escalation.
- Retries remain: decrement
- Validator timeout or malformed output: record
unknown/VALIDATOR_TIMEOUTorunknown/OUTPUT_UNPARSEABLE. Retry within the durable budget; after exhaustion invoke the Arbiter when a holistic decision remains relevant, otherwise hold and aggregate one human escalation. - A Phase Validator checks HANDOFF claims only. Deterministic end conditions and Exit Evidence remain authoritative and must pass independently.
- Review: Read the sub-agent's HANDOFF. Did it accomplish the phase goal?
- If HANDOFF present but phase goal NOT met: re-delegate the phase to a fresh sub-agent with clarified success criteria. If the bounded attempts are exhausted, record incomplete coverage, hold dependent phases and terminal completion, and add the gap to the single human escalation.
- A
partialphase is progress metadata only. It never satisfies a dependency or authorizes advancement. 5.5. Log delegation result:node .citadel/scripts/telemetry-log.cjs --event agent-complete --agent {delegate-name} --session {campaign-slug} --status {success|partial|failed}
- Record: Update the campaign file:
- Mark phase status using
updatePhaseStatusfromcore/campaigns/update-campaignvianode -e(snippet: docs/CAMPAIGNS.md#updating-phase-status). Valid values:pending,in-progress,design-complete,complete,partial,failed,skipped - Add entries to Feature Ledger; append decisions at the bottom of Decision Log (oldest-first), using top-level
-bullets with reasons and details indented beneath each entry
- Mark phase status using
- Self-correct: Run applicable checks from Step 4: quality spot-check (every phase), direction alignment (every 2nd phase), regression guard and anti-pattern scan (build phases only).
Step 4: SELF-CORRECTION (Mandatory)
Direction Alignment Check (every 2 phases)
- Re-read the campaign's original Direction field
- Compare to the Feature Ledger (what was actually built)
- If aligned: log "Direction check: aligned" in Active Context, continue
- If drifted: stop current phase. Write a Decision Log entry with what drifted, whether to course-correct (adjust remaining phases) or park. If course-correcting: rewrite remaining phases to re-align.
Quality Spot-Check (every phase)
- Read the most significant output of the phase
- Check: TypeScript strict mode? Types correct? Clean structure? Follows CLAUDE.md conventions?
- If view files (.tsx, .jsx, .vue, .svelte, .html) were modified: invoke /live-preview
- If below bar: add a remediation task before marking complete
Regression Guard (every build phase)
- Run typecheck via
node scripts/run-with-timeout.js 300 - Compare error count to campaign baseline
- Escalation: 1-2 new errors — fix before continuing; 3-4 — log warning, attempt fixes, continue if resolved; 5+ — PARK the campaign
- If test suite exists: run it. New failures trigger the same escalation.
Anti-Pattern Scan (every build phase)
Scan modified files for: transition-all (name specific properties); confirm(), alert(), prompt() (use in-app components); missing Escape key handlers in modals/overlays; hardcoded values that should be constants. Fix any found before marking the phase complete.
Step 5: VERIFY (after build phases)
- Run typecheck via
node scripts/run-with-timeout.js 300 <typecheck-cmd> - Run test suite if configured (use timeout wrapper)
- If verification fails: record the failure, then decide:
- Fix if: 1-2 failures and each has an isolated root cause
- Skip if: 3+ failures or failures involve cross-file state that risks cascading changes. On skip: park the campaign, write
verification_halt: trueto campaign file with note listing which checks failed
Step 6: CONTINUATION (before context runs low)
Context restoration: When resuming, use the Claude Code Compaction API. Do NOT read
.claude/compact-state.json— deprecated. Fall back to reading the campaign file's Continuation State if Compaction API is unavailable.
- Update Active Context in campaign file
- Write Continuation State: current phase/sub-step, files modified, blocking issues, next actions
- Next Archon invocation reads this and resumes
Step 7: COMPLETION
- Run final verification via
node scripts/run-with-timeout.js 300 - Confirm every required phase gate is current, subject-bound,
passed, and complete, with no unresolved required checkpoint, human gate, dependency, or Arbiter block. Otherwise keep the campaign active or record a non-success terminal outcome such asblocked-decision; do not mark it completed. - Update campaign status to
completed3.5. Knowledge handoff:- Review the active project instructions and
.citadel/project.md(if present). The Learn skill writes.planning/wiki/,.planning/memory/, and possibly.claude/harness.json; do not invoke it if any of those writes conflict with project restrictions. - If the Learn skill is installed and permitted, invoke it once for this completed campaign (
/learn {slug}in Claude Code,$citadel.learn {slug}in Codex). This is a Citadel skill invocation, not an npm command in the adopted project. - If Learn is absent, disallowed, or deferred, add
## Knowledge Follow-upto the campaign file with the slug, source campaign path, reason, owner, and next permitted extraction or review action. Do not add an unavailable-command TODO or claim compilation occurred.
- Review the active project instructions and
- Move campaign file to
.planning/campaigns/completed/ - Release scope claims
- Log completion:
node .citadel/scripts/telemetry-log.cjs --event campaign-complete --agent archon --session {campaign-slug} - Output final HANDOFF
- Suggest
/postmortem - Auto-fix handoff — for any PRs created this campaign:
---PR READY--- PR #<N>: <url> To watch CI automatically: Local → /pr-watch <N> fixes failures in this terminal Cloud → open in Claude Code web or mobile, toggle "Auto fix" ON (fixes CI + review comments remotely; requires Claude GitHub App) ---
Health Diagnostic (Undirected Mode)
Begin the user-facing result with Archon health diagnostic so the mode is explicit even when there is no active work. Summarize the findings from the checks below and recommend the next action. Identify unavailable checks (for example, no configured typecheck) instead of implying they passed.
- Check
.planning/intake/for pending items → suggest processing - Check for active campaigns → suggest continuing
- Check for recently completed campaigns → suggest verification
- Run typecheck — if errors climbing vs last campaign, suggest a fix-type-errors campaign
- Check
.planning/campaigns/completed/— if 3+ exist, suggest archival/cleanup - If nothing: "No active work. Give me a direction or run
/do status."
Quality Gates
- Every phase must produce a verifiable result
- Campaign file must be updated after every phase
- Sub-agents must receive full context injection (CLAUDE.md + rules-summary)
- Never re-delegate the same failing work without changing the approach
- Every required gate must be current, subject-bound,
passed, and complete before it unlocks a dependent phase - Timeout, malformed output, missing evidence, incomplete coverage, and exhausted retries never authorize advancement or completion
- Continue only dependency-independent reversible work while held gates remain unresolved
- Maintain one deduplicated human escalation per campaign, updated with every held subject and reason
- Continuation State must be written before context runs low
- Direction alignment must pass every 2 phases
- Quality spot-check must pass every phase
- Regression guard must pass every build phase
Circuit Breakers
Park the campaign when:
- 3+ consecutive failures on the same approach
- Fundamental architectural conflict discovered
- Quality spot-check fails 3 times in a row
- 2 consecutive direction alignment failures
- 5+ new typecheck errors in a single phase
- Build introduces regressions in existing tests
Recovery
- Find the verified checkpoint identity in Continuation State and confirm it is bound to the expected campaign, phase, worktree, base revision, and dirty-tree digest.
- Apply the verified checkpoint without consuming the only copy; do not guess a ref or fall back to an unqualified
git stash pop. - Run typecheck to confirm clean state
- Log rollback to Decision Log with what was restored and why
Within a live session, prefer native rollback first: Claude Code checkpoints plus /rewind restore both conversation and files to the pre-phase state. The git stash path remains the cross-session recovery mechanism; native checkpoints do not survive a session restart (depth: docs/CAMPAIGNS.md#checkpoints-and-recovery).
Fringe Cases
- No active campaign + no direction: Run Health Diagnostic. Never error.
- Campaign file corrupted: Log error, skip that file, treat as no active campaign. Report to user.
- Checkpoint creation or verification fails: Record
unknown/CHECKPOINT_UNAVAILABLE. Continue only Green, dependency-independent, workspace-reversible work when checkpoint policy is advisory; otherwise hold the phase and aggregate one human escalation. .planning/campaigns/missing: Treat as no active campaigns. Proceed to directed/undirected mode.- Sub-agent returns no HANDOFF: Record
unknown/MISSING_HANDOFF, preserve any observable work as incomplete coverage, hold dependents, and aggregate one human escalation after bounded retry. - Sub-agent hangs and never returns: After 30 minutes without a response, abort the attempt, log
unknown/PHASE_TIMEOUT, and proceed to Recovery. Independent reversible phases may continue; dependents remain held. - Phase validator returns no JSON or malformed JSON: Retry once with the schema restated. If still malformed, record
unknown/OUTPUT_UNPARSEABLE, consume the durable retry budget, then hold or invoke the Arbiter as specified in Step 4.5. - Policy enforcer returns no JSON, malformed JSON, or times out (> 2 min): Record
unknown/POLICY_RESULT_UNAVAILABLE, hold the Red operation, and add it to the campaign's single human escalation. Policy unavailability cannot grant authority. - Phase validator times out (> 3 min): Record
unknown/VALIDATOR_TIMEOUT, consume the durable retry budget, then hold or invoke the Arbiter as specified in Step 4.5. - All validator retries exhausted: Preserve the failed/unknown observations, log
validator_halt, invoke the Arbiter when applicable, hold dependent work and completion, and aggregate one human escalation.
Contextual Gates
Disclosure
One sentence before executing:
- New campaign: "This will create a {N}-phase campaign touching {scope}. Estimated {sessions} sessions (~${cost})."
- Continue: "Resuming campaign {slug} at phase {current}/{total}."
Reversibility
- Green: Single-phase, < 5 file changes
- Amber: Multi-phase campaigns — revert requires rolling back multiple commits
- Red: Campaigns modifying CI/CD config, publishing content, or pushing to remote — require explicit confirmation regardless of trust level
Approval Gates
When a phase boundary or risk gate needs user confirmation (Step 2.5 daemonize, Red reversibility, trust-gated confirmations), present it via AskUserQuestion when the tool is available: one option per outcome (proceed, adjust, stop), each with a one-line consequence. Fall back to the plain text prompt when unavailable.
Policy Gate (Red operations only)
Before any Red-reversibility operation (remote push, PR creation, CI/CD modification), spawn the policy-enforcer (subagent_type citadel:policy-enforcer, effort: low) to check Tier 1 rules P-001, P-002, P-004, P-007 against the proposed action, with campaign/agent/session context (invocation template: docs/CAMPAIGNS.md#policy-enforcement). Parse the verdict JSON:
verdict: "allow": proceed with the operation.verdict: "block": do NOT proceed. Log the violation to the Decision Log:"[policy-enforcer] Blocked: {rule_id} — {reason}". Report to the user and stop.
The policy gate is non-negotiable for Tier 1 violations. Never override a block verdict.
Proportionality
- Single sentence input + 5+ phases → downgrade to Marshal
- Single file input + cross-domain decomposition → narrow scope
Trust Gating
Read trust level from harness.json (readTrustLevel() in harness-health-util.js):
- Novice (0-4 sessions): Confirm before any campaign. Show recovery instructions after each phase.
- Familiar (5-19 sessions): Confirm for campaigns > $10 or > 3 phases.
- Trusted (20+ sessions): No confirmation for amber. Red only.
Step 2.5 trust gating: Novice — skip Step 2.5 entirely, do not offer daemon. Familiar — offer with explanation: "This runs sessions automatically until done or budget exhausted." Trusted — offer with cost only: "Run continuously? (~${cost}) [y/n]"
Exit Protocol
Update the campaign file, then output:
---HANDOFF---
- Campaign: {name} — Phase {current}/{total}
- Completed: {what was done this session}
- Decisions: {key choices made}
- Next: {what the next session should do}
- Reversibility: amber -- multi-phase campaign, revert with git revert HEAD~{commits}
---Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- mayankjain1815-commits/CITADEL★ 466% same
Wrote their own version · 3
- coleam00/dark-factory-experiment★ 139same name
- abdullah1854/ClaudeSuperSkills★ 1same name
- prospapledge88/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository49 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- architectSkill
- ascii-diagramSkill
- autopilotSkill
- costSkill
- create-appSkill
- create-skillSkill
- daemonSkill
- dashboardSkill
- decision-mapSkill
- deploy-stewardSkill
- designSkill
- doc-genSkill
- doSkill
- evolveSkill
- experimentSkill
- fleetSkill
- grillSkill
- housecleanSkill
- improveSkill
- infra-auditSkill
- learnSkill
- live-previewSkill
- loopSkill
- mapSkill
- marshalSkill
- merge-reviewSkill
- organizeSkill
- postmortemSkill
- prdSkill
- pr-watchSkill
- qaSkill
- refactorSkill
- researchSkill
- reviewSkill
- scaffoldSkill
- scheduleSkill
- session-handoffSkill
- setupSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- telemetrySkill
- test-genSkill
- triageSkill
- unharnessSkill
- verifySkill
- watchSkill
- wikiSkill
- workspaceSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

