tdd
Skill3 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Enforce test-driven development workflow. Scaffold interfaces, generate tests FIRST, then implement minimal code to pass. Ensure 80%+ coverage.
194 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Claude-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- trpc/trpctheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- wowyuarm/dsh-agent-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Contexera/dsh-agent-teamtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/dveritytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use capture-learning-tools, design-frontend-dev and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
The-Vibe-CompanySkillcapture-learning-tools
Turn technical conversations, bugs, CI failures, review comments,
Also in 5 projects that use this
The-Vibe-CompanySkilldesign-frontend-dev
Clean Impeccable frontend design skill. Use when the user wants to
Also in 5 projects that use this
tristanphvnSkillketchup-video
Catch the user up like /keel:ketchup, with a short silent video of slides for what happened and the waiting calls as text under it. Use for /keel:ketchup-video.
Also in 14 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillfigure-it-out
Use when novel or multi-phase work needs an auditable workflow and no narrower playbook fits.
Also in 54 projects that use this
jaydubya818Skillprinciple-laziness-protocol
Apply when a refactor is adding wrappers or abstractions instead of simplifying.
Also in 45 projects that use this
- +2 more from The-Vibe-Company
- +5 more from jaydubya818
Other versions194 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 194
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- trpc/trpc★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode★ 41ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- ccusage/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- ryoppippi/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- MODSetter/SurfSense★ 17ksame name
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16ksame name
184 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository67 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- optimize-contextSkill
- a11y-checkSkill
- api-contractSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- build-fixSkill
- checkpointSkill
- clickhouse-ioSkill
- code-review-eccSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- config-auditSkill
- continuous-learning-v2Skill
- create-prdSkill
- deps-auditSkill
- e2eSkill
- eval-harnessSkill
- evalSkill
- evolveSkill
- executeSkill
- execution-reportSkill
- extract-sharedSkill
- firecrawlSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- frontend-patternsSkill
- golang-patternsSkill
- golang-testingSkill
- implement-fixSkill
- init-projectSkill
- instinct-exportSkill
- instinct-importSkill
- instinct-statusSkill
- iterative-retrievalSkill
- lazySkill
- learnSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- perf-profileSkill
- plan-eccSkill
- plan-featureSkill
- postgres-patternsSkill
- primeSkill
- project-guidelines-exampleSkill
- projectSkill
- prompt-auditSkill
- python-patternsSkill
- python-reviewSkill
- python-testingSkill
- rcaSkill
- refactor-cleanSkill
- releaseSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- seo-kitSkill
- set-working-dirSkill
- skill-createSkill
- strategic-compactSkill
- supadataSkill
- system-reviewSkill
- tdd-workflowSkill
- test-coverageSkill
- testSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 186 edited versions we read keep these.
12
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Generate Tests First: - Write failing tests (RED)
- Distinctive: line 14
Implement Minimal Code: - Write just enough to pass (GREEN)
- Distinctive: line 16
Verify Coverage: - Ensure 80%+ test coverage
- Distinctive: line 260
Write the test FIRST, before any implementation
- Distinctive: line 261
Run tests and verify they FAIL before implementing
- Distinctive: line 262
Write minimal code to make tests pass
- Distinctive: line 264
Add edge cases and error scenarios
- Distinctive: line 268
Write implementation before tests
- Distinctive: line 270
Write too much code at once
- Distinctive: line 272
Test implementation details (test behavior)
- Distinctive: line 307
RED: - Write failing test
- Distinctive: line 311
Never skip the RED phase. Never write code before tests.
- Very specific: line 315
Use /plan first to understand what to build
- Very specific: line 316
Use /tdd to implement with tests
- Very specific: line 317
Use /build-and-fix if build errors occur
- Very specific: line 318
Use /code-review to review implementation
- Very specific: line 319
Use /test-coverage to verify coverage
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 186 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
TDD Command
This command invokes the tdd-guide agent to enforce test-driven development methodology.
What This Command Does
- Scaffold Interfaces - Define types/interfaces first
- Generate Tests First - Write failing tests (RED)
- Implement Minimal Code - Write just enough to pass (GREEN)
- Refactor - Improve code while keeping tests green (REFACTOR)
- Verify Coverage - Ensure 80%+ test coverage
When to Use
Use /tdd when:
- Implementing new features
- Adding new functions/components
- Fixing bugs (write test that reproduces bug first)
- Refactoring existing code
- Building critical business logic
How It Works
The tdd-guide agent will:
- Define interfaces for inputs/outputs
- Write tests that will FAIL (because code doesn't exist yet)
- Run tests and verify they fail for the right reason
- Write minimal implementation to make tests pass
- Run tests and verify they pass
- Refactor code while keeping tests green
- Check coverage and add more tests if below 80%
TDD Cycle
RED → GREEN → REFACTOR → REPEAT
RED: Write a failing test
GREEN: Write minimal code to pass
REFACTOR: Improve code, keep tests passing
REPEAT: Next feature/scenarioExample Usage
User: /tdd I need a function to calculate market liquidity score
Agent (tdd-guide):
# TDD Session: Market Liquidity Score Calculator
## Step 1: Define Interface (SCAFFOLD)
```typescript
// lib/liquidity.ts
export interface MarketData {
totalVolume: number
bidAskSpread: number
activeTraders: number
lastTradeTime: Date
}
export function calculateLiquidityScore(market: MarketData): number {
// TODO: Implementation
throw new Error('Not implemented')
}Step 2: Write Failing Test (RED)
// lib/liquidity.test.ts
import { calculateLiquidityScore } from './liquidity'
describe('calculateLiquidityScore', () => {
it('should return high score for liquid market', () => {
const market = {
totalVolume: 100000,
bidAskSpread: 0.01,
activeTraders: 500,
lastTradeTime: new Date()
}
const score = calculateLiquidityScore(market)
expect(score).toBeGreaterThan(80)
expect(score).toBeLessThanOrEqual(100)
})
it('should return low score for illiquid market', () => {
const market = {
totalVolume: 100,
bidAskSpread: 0.5,
activeTraders: 2,
lastTradeTime: new Date(Date.now() - 86400000) // 1 day ago
}
const score = calculateLiquidityScore(market)
expect(score).toBeLessThan(30)
expect(score).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0)
})
it('should handle edge case: zero volume', () => {
const market = {
totalVolume: 0,
bidAskSpread: 0,
activeTraders: 0,
lastTradeTime: new Date()
}
const score = calculateLiquidityScore(market)
expect(score).toBe(0)
})
})Step 3: Run Tests - Verify FAIL
npm test lib/liquidity.test.ts
FAIL lib/liquidity.test.ts
✕ should return high score for liquid market (2 ms)
Error: Not implemented
1 test failed, 0 passedTests fail as expected. Ready to implement.
Step 4: Implement Minimal Code (GREEN)
// lib/liquidity.ts
export function calculateLiquidityScore(market: MarketData): number {
// Handle zero volume edge case
if (market.totalVolume === 0) {
return 0
}
// Calculate component scores (0-100 scale)
const volumeScore = Math.min(market.totalVolume / 1000, 100)
const spreadScore = Math.max(100 - (market.bidAskSpread * 1000), 0)
const traderScore = Math.min(market.activeTraders / 10, 100)
// Recent activity bonus
const hoursSinceLastTrade = (Date.now() - market.lastTradeTime.getTime()) / (1000 * 60 * 60)
const recencyScore = Math.max(100 - (hoursSinceLastTrade * 10), 0)
// Weighted average
const score = (
volumeScore * 0.4 +
spreadScore * 0.3 +
traderScore * 0.2 +
recencyScore * 0.1
)
return Math.min(Math.max(score, 0), 100) // Clamp to 0-100
}Step 5: Run Tests - Verify PASS
npm test lib/liquidity.test.ts
PASS lib/liquidity.test.ts
✓ should return high score for liquid market (3 ms)
✓ should return low score for illiquid market (2 ms)
✓ should handle edge case: zero volume (1 ms)
3 tests passedAll tests passing!
Step 6: Refactor (IMPROVE)
// lib/liquidity.ts - Refactored with constants and better readability
const WEIGHTS = {
VOLUME: 0.4,
SPREAD: 0.3,
TRADERS: 0.2,
RECENCY: 0.1,
} as const
const SCALE_FACTORS = {
VOLUME: 1000,
SPREAD: 1000,
TRADERS: 10,
RECENCY_PENALTY: 10,
} as const
function clamp(value: number, min: number, max: number): number {
return Math.min(Math.max(value, min), max)
}
export function calculateLiquidityScore(market: MarketData): number {
if (market.totalVolume === 0) return 0
const volumeScore = Math.min(market.totalVolume / SCALE_FACTORS.VOLUME, 100)
const spreadScore = clamp(100 - (market.bidAskSpread * SCALE_FACTORS.SPREAD), 0, 100)
const traderScore = Math.min(market.activeTraders / SCALE_FACTORS.TRADERS, 100)
const hoursSinceLastTrade = (Date.now() - market.lastTradeTime.getTime()) / (1000 * 60 * 60)
const recencyScore = clamp(100 - (hoursSinceLastTrade * SCALE_FACTORS.RECENCY_PENALTY), 0, 100)
const weightedScore =
volumeScore * WEIGHTS.VOLUME +
spreadScore * WEIGHTS.SPREAD +
traderScore * WEIGHTS.TRADERS +
recencyScore * WEIGHTS.RECENCY
return clamp(weightedScore, 0, 100)
}Step 7: Verify Tests Still Pass
npm test lib/liquidity.test.ts
PASS lib/liquidity.test.ts
✓ should return high score for liquid market (3 ms)
✓ should return low score for illiquid market (2 ms)
✓ should handle edge case: zero volume (1 ms)
3 tests passedRefactoring complete, tests still passing!
Step 8: Check Coverage
npm test -- --coverage lib/liquidity.test.ts
File | % Stmts | % Branch | % Funcs | % Lines
---------------|---------|----------|---------|--------
liquidity.ts | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100
Coverage: 100% (Target: 80%)TDD session complete!
## TDD Best Practices
**DO:**
- Write the test FIRST, before any implementation
- Run tests and verify they FAIL before implementing
- Write minimal code to make tests pass
- Refactor only after tests are green
- Add edge cases and error scenarios
- Aim for 80%+ coverage (100% for critical code)
**DON'T:**
- Write implementation before tests
- Skip running tests after each change
- Write too much code at once
- Ignore failing tests
- Test implementation details (test behavior)
- Mock everything (prefer integration tests)
## Test Types to Include
**Unit Tests** (Function-level):
- Happy path scenarios
- Edge cases (empty, null, max values)
- Error conditions
- Boundary values
**Integration Tests** (Component-level):
- API endpoints
- Database operations
- External service calls
- React components with hooks
**E2E Tests** (use `/e2e` command):
- Critical user flows
- Multi-step processes
- Full stack integration
## Coverage Requirements
- **80% minimum** for all code
- **100% required** for:
- Financial calculations
- Authentication logic
- Security-critical code
- Core business logic
## Important Notes
**MANDATORY**: Tests must be written BEFORE implementation. The TDD cycle is:
1. **RED** - Write failing test
2. **GREEN** - Implement to pass
3. **REFACTOR** - Improve code
Never skip the RED phase. Never write code before tests.
## Integration with Other Commands
- Use `/plan` first to understand what to build
- Use `/tdd` to implement with tests
- Use `/build-and-fix` if build errors occur
- Use `/code-review` to review implementation
- Use `/test-coverage` to verify coverage
## Related Agents
This command invokes the `tdd-guide` agent located at:
`~/.claude/agents/tdd-guide.md`
And can reference the `tdd-workflow` skill at:
`~/.claude/skills/tdd-workflow/`Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

