agentleFS
Sign inStart free
PatriotAgenticLLCPatriotAgenticLLC/better_claude_skillz/skills/code-review-ecc/SKILL.md

code-review-ecc

Skill3 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Comprehensive security and quality review of uncommitted changes

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Never approve code with security vulnerabilities!

    line 45

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Code Review

Comprehensive security and quality review of uncommitted changes:

  1. Get changed files: git diff --name-only HEAD
  2. For each changed file, check for:

Security Issues (CRITICAL):

  • Hardcoded credentials, API keys, tokens
  • SQL injection vulnerabilities
  • XSS vulnerabilities
  • Missing input validation
  • Insecure dependencies
  • Path traversal risks

Code Quality (HIGH):

  • Functions > 50 lines
  • Files > 800 lines
  • Nesting depth > 4 levels
  • Missing error handling
  • console.log statements
  • TODO/FIXME comments
  • Missing JSDoc for public APIs

Best Practices (MEDIUM):

  • Mutation patterns (use immutable instead)
  • Emoji usage in code/comments
  • Missing tests for new code
  • Accessibility issues (a11y)
  1. Generate report with:
    • Severity: CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW
    • File location and line numbers
    • Issue description
    • Suggested fix
  2. Block commit if CRITICAL or HIGH issues found

Never approve code with security vulnerabilities!

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free