talent-sourcing
Skill61 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Finds qualified candidates for a role by searching LinkedIn, Indeed, GitHub, and other professional platforms using Nimble Web Search Agents. Accepts a job description, role title, or freeform request and returns a ranked candidate list with profiles, skills, and contact signals.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- explorium-ai/gtm-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- explorium-ai/gtm-skills★ 346same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- account-briefSkill
- account-discoverySkill
- account-enrichmentSkill
- account-signalsSkill
- brand-mention-monitorSkill
- company-deep-diveSkill
- competitor-intelSkill
- competitor-positioningSkill
- credit-riskSkill
- deal-sourcingSkill
- decision-maker-identificationSkill
- due-diligenceSkill
- healthcare-providers-enrichSkill
- healthcare-providers-extractSkill
- healthcare-providers-verifySkill
- kyc-screeningSkill
- launch-monitorSkill
- local-placesSkill
- market-finderSkill
- meeting-prepSkill
- nimble-databricks-data-productsSkill
- nimble-web-expertSkill
- portfolio-monitoringSkill
- seo-intelSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 56
Follow the transport selection + standard preflight from references/nimble-playbook.md — pick CLI or MCP at session start, then run the …
- Distinctive: line 65
No profile → fine, talent-sourcing doesn't require onboarding.
- Distinctive: line 76
If a full job description was pasted, extract the above fields from it.
- Very specific: line 78
If role is missing or ambiguous, ask with AskUserQuestion:
- Distinctive: line 123
Search for people matching the role criteria.
- Distinctive: line 132
If a LinkedIn WSA was discovered in Step 2, use it instead with the role title, location, and skill keywords as inputs.
- Distinctive: line 208
Tier 1 (Strong match, 7–10): All required signals present
- Very specific: line 214
Before presenting results, check ~/.nimble/memory/talent-sourcing/[role-slug].md — if a candidate was surfaced in a prior run, mark them …
- Very specific: line 261
Update ~/.nimble/memory/talent-sourcing/index.md with a row for this search.
- Very specific: line 262
Follow the wiki update pattern from references/memory-and-distribution.md.
- Very specific: line 266
Always offer distribution — do not skip this step: Follow references/memory-and-distribution.md for connector detection, sharing flow, and …
- Distinctive: line 293
Profile behind login wall: Keep search-snippet summary.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Talent Sourcing
Candidate discovery powered by Nimble Web Search Agents.
User request: $ARGUMENTS
Before running any commands, read references/nimble-playbook.md for Claude Code
constraints (no shell state, no &/wait, sub-agent permissions, communication style).
Instructions
Step 0: Preflight
Follow the transport selection + standard preflight from references/nimble-playbook.md — pick CLI or MCP at session start, then run the standard preflight calls (date calc, today, profile, memory index) in parallel.
Also simultaneously:
mkdir -p ~/.nimble/memory/{reports,talent-sourcing}
From the results:
- CLI missing or API key unset → read
references/profile-and-onboarding.md, stop - Tag all
nimbleCLI calls:nimble --client-source nimble-agent-skills <subcommand>. MCP requests are attributed at the transport level — seereferences/nimble-playbook.md. - Profile exists → note industry keywords if any; proceed to Step 1
- No profile → fine, talent-sourcing doesn't require onboarding; proceed to Step 1
Step 1: Parse Request & Confirm Search Parameters
Parse $ARGUMENTS for:
- Role — job title or function (e.g. "Senior React Engineer", "Head of Sales")
- Location — city, metro, region, or remote (e.g. "New York City", "remote US")
- Skills / requirements — specific technologies, years of experience, domain expertise
- Seniority — junior, mid, senior, staff, director, VP, C-level
- Source preference — specific platforms (LinkedIn, GitHub, Indeed, etc.) or "all"
If a full job description was pasted, extract the above fields from it.
If role is missing or ambiguous, ask with AskUserQuestion:
"What role are you hiring for, and where? (e.g. 'Senior ML Engineer, remote US' or paste a job description)"
Once parameters are clear, confirm with the user using AskUserQuestion:
"Searching for: [Role] | Location: [Location] | Key skills: [Skills] | Seniority: [Seniority]
Platforms to search: LinkedIn, Indeed, GitHub (for technical roles), AngelList / Wellfound, and professional communities.
- Start search
- Adjust parameters first"
Step 2: WSA Discovery
Discover available Web Search Agents for candidate-sourcing platforms. Run simultaneously:
nimble extract:templates list --limit 100 # then filter items for "linkedin people"
nimble extract:templates list --limit 100 # then filter items for "indeed resume"
nimble extract:templates list --limit 100 # then filter items for "github profile"
nimble extract:templates list --limit 100 # then filter items for "wellfound talent"Filter results for entity_type: SERP or entity_type: PDP. Prefer
managed_by: "nimble". Validate promising agents with:
nimble extract:templates get --extract-template-name {name}Cache discovered WSA names and required params. If no WSAs found for a platform,
fall back to nimble search for that platform.
Step 3: Parallel Candidate Search (Sub-Agents)
Spawn nimble-researcher agents (agents/nimble-researcher.md) with
mode: "bypassPermissions", max 4 concurrent. Assign one agent per platform:
Agent 1 — LinkedIn
Search for people matching the role criteria. Use Boolean-style query construction:
nimble search --query "site:linkedin.com/in [Role] [Location] [Key Skills]" \
--max-results 15 --search-depth fast
nimble search --query "[Role] [Location] linkedin profile [Skill1] [Skill2]" \
--max-results 10 --search-depth fastIf a LinkedIn WSA was discovered in Step 2, use it instead with the role title, location, and skill keywords as inputs.
Agent 2 — Indeed / Resumes
nimble search --query "site:indeed.com resume [Role] [Location] [Key Skills]" \
--max-results 10 --search-depth fast
nimble search --query "[Role] resume [Location] [Key Skills]" \
--max-results 10 --search-depth fastAgent 3 — GitHub (technical roles only)
Skip this agent for non-technical roles (e.g. Sales, Marketing, Operations).
nimble search --query "site:github.com [Role] [Location] [Key Skills]" \
--max-results 10 --search-depth fast
nimble search --query "github [Key Skills] developer [Location] open to work" \
--max-results 10 --search-depth fastAgent 4 — AngelList / Wellfound + Communities
nimble search --query "site:wellfound.com [Role] [Location] [Key Skills]" \
--max-results 10 --search-depth fast
nimble search --query "[Role] [Location] open to work OR seeking opportunities \
[Key Skills]" --max-results 10 --search-depth fastEach agent returns: candidate name (if available), profile URL, current title, location snippet, inferred skills, availability signals ("open to work", "seeking", "available") with event date (if available) and source URL.
Step 4: Deep Profile Extraction
For the top candidates identified in Step 3 (aim for 10–20 unique profiles across all platforms), extract full profile details. Run all extractions simultaneously:
nimble extract --url "[profile-url]" --format markdownFrom each extracted profile, pull:
- Full name
- Current role & company
- Location
- Skills / tech stack
- Experience summary (years, notable employers)
- Education
- Availability signals (open to work, recent job change, posting activity)
- Contact signals (email, personal site, GitHub handle)
For extraction failures, follow the fallback pattern in
references/nimble-playbook.md. If a profile is behind a login wall and extraction
fails, keep the search-snippet summary instead — do not skip the candidate.
Extraction budget: extract up to 15 profiles. If more than 15 candidates were found in Step 3, prioritize by relevance score (seniority match + skill overlap + location match) before extracting.
Step 5: Score & Rank Candidates
Score each candidate (1–10) using these weighted signals:
| Signal | Weight |
| Role / title match | 30% |
| Skill overlap with requirements | 30% |
| Location match | 20% |
| Seniority match | 10% |
| Availability signals | 10% |
Group candidates into tiers:
- Tier 1 (Strong match, 7–10): All required signals present
- Tier 2 (Partial match, 4–6): Most signals present, 1–2 gaps
- Tier 3 (Stretch, 1–3): Worth reviewing if Tier 1/2 list is thin
Step 6: Output
Before presenting results, check ~/.nimble/memory/talent-sourcing/[role-slug].md —
if a candidate was surfaced in a prior run, mark them (previously surfaced) rather
than re-presenting them as new.
Present a structured candidate report:
## Candidate Report: [Role] in [Location]
Searched: LinkedIn, Indeed, GitHub, Wellfound
Found: [N] candidates | Tier 1: [N] | Tier 2: [N] | Tier 3: [N]
**TL;DR:** [2-3 sentence summary of the strongest candidates and any notable patterns]
---
### Tier 1 — Strong Match
#### 1. [Name] — [Score]/10
- **Current role:** [Title] at [Company]
- **Location:** [Location]
- **Skills:** [Skill1], [Skill2], [Skill3]
- **Experience:** [X years, notable employers]
- **Availability:** [signal] — [event date or "date unknown"] — [source URL]
- **Profile:** [URL]
- **Contact signals:** [email / personal site / GitHub]
...
---
### What This Means
[1-2 sentences on hiring outlook: supply/demand signal, speed recommendation, any
standout sourcing channel]Omit fields where data is unavailable. Do not fabricate details — use "unknown" for missing fields. Add a one-sentence "Why this candidate" note for each Tier 1 result.
Step 7: Save to Memory
Make all Write calls simultaneously:
- Report →
~/.nimble/memory/reports/talent-sourcing-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md(full candidate report with all tiers) - Per-role →
~/.nimble/memory/talent-sourcing/[role-slug].md(candidate list; write or update) - Profile → update
last_runs.talent-sourcingin~/.nimble/business-profile.jsonusing the python3 snippet inreferences/profile-and-onboarding.md. Skip if the file does not exist.
Update ~/.nimble/memory/talent-sourcing/index.md with a row for this search.
Follow the wiki update pattern from references/memory-and-distribution.md.
Step 8: Share & Distribute
Always offer distribution — do not skip this step. Follow
references/memory-and-distribution.md for connector detection, sharing flow, and
source links enforcement.
Step 9: Follow-ups
Offer next steps using AskUserQuestion:
What's next?
- Go deeper on a candidate — extract full profile + find contact info
- Expand search — broaden location, relax seniority, try more platforms
- Narrow search — add a required skill or tighten location
- Export list — save as CSV or formatted doc
- Done
Sibling skill suggestions:
- Run
company-deep-diveon a candidate's current employer for deal context- Run
meeting-prepbefore reaching out to a Tier 1 candidate
Error Handling
See references/nimble-playbook.md for the standard error table. Skill-specific
handling:
- Profile behind login wall: Keep search-snippet summary; note "full profile unavailable — LinkedIn/Indeed login required" in the candidate entry.
- < 5 total candidates found: Notify the user, suggest broadening location to remote or relaxing seniority, then ask whether to re-run with adjusted params.
- Search 500 on a platform: Retry once with a simplified query; if still failing, skip that platform and note it in the report header.
- GitHub agent skipped for non-technical role: Note "GitHub not searched for this role type" in the report header.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

