agentleFS
NimblewayNimbleway/agent-skills/skills/talent-sourcing/SKILL.md

talent-sourcing

Skill61 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Finds qualified candidates for a role by searching LinkedIn, Indeed, GitHub, and other professional platforms using Nimble Web Search Agents. Accepts a job description, role title, or freeform request and returns a ranked candidate list with profiles, skills, and contact signals.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Follow the transport selection + standard preflight from references/nimble-playbook.md — pick CLI or MCP at session start, then run the …

    line 56
  2. Distinctive:

    No profile → fine, talent-sourcing doesn't require onboarding.

    line 65
  3. Distinctive:

    If a full job description was pasted, extract the above fields from it.

    line 76
  4. Very specific:

    If role is missing or ambiguous, ask with AskUserQuestion:

    line 78
  5. Distinctive:

    Search for people matching the role criteria.

    line 123
  6. Distinctive:

    If a LinkedIn WSA was discovered in Step 2, use it instead with the role title, location, and skill keywords as inputs.

    line 132
  7. Distinctive:

    Tier 1 (Strong match, 7–10): All required signals present

    line 208
  8. Very specific:

    Before presenting results, check ~/.nimble/memory/talent-sourcing/[role-slug].md — if a candidate was surfaced in a prior run, mark them …

    line 214
  9. Very specific:

    Update ~/.nimble/memory/talent-sourcing/index.md with a row for this search.

    line 261
  10. Very specific:

    Follow the wiki update pattern from references/memory-and-distribution.md.

    line 262
  11. Very specific:

    Always offer distribution — do not skip this step: Follow references/memory-and-distribution.md for connector detection, sharing flow, and …

    line 266
  12. Distinctive:

    Profile behind login wall: Keep search-snippet summary.

    line 293

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Talent Sourcing

Candidate discovery powered by Nimble Web Search Agents.

User request: $ARGUMENTS

Before running any commands, read references/nimble-playbook.md for Claude Code constraints (no shell state, no &/wait, sub-agent permissions, communication style).


Instructions

Step 0: Preflight

Follow the transport selection + standard preflight from references/nimble-playbook.md — pick CLI or MCP at session start, then run the standard preflight calls (date calc, today, profile, memory index) in parallel.

Also simultaneously:

  • mkdir -p ~/.nimble/memory/{reports,talent-sourcing}

From the results:

  • CLI missing or API key unset → read references/profile-and-onboarding.md, stop
  • Tag all nimble CLI calls: nimble --client-source nimble-agent-skills <subcommand>. MCP requests are attributed at the transport level — see references/nimble-playbook.md.
  • Profile exists → note industry keywords if any; proceed to Step 1
  • No profile → fine, talent-sourcing doesn't require onboarding; proceed to Step 1

Step 1: Parse Request & Confirm Search Parameters

Parse $ARGUMENTS for:

  • Role — job title or function (e.g. "Senior React Engineer", "Head of Sales")
  • Location — city, metro, region, or remote (e.g. "New York City", "remote US")
  • Skills / requirements — specific technologies, years of experience, domain expertise
  • Seniority — junior, mid, senior, staff, director, VP, C-level
  • Source preference — specific platforms (LinkedIn, GitHub, Indeed, etc.) or "all"

If a full job description was pasted, extract the above fields from it.

If role is missing or ambiguous, ask with AskUserQuestion:

"What role are you hiring for, and where? (e.g. 'Senior ML Engineer, remote US' or paste a job description)"

Once parameters are clear, confirm with the user using AskUserQuestion:

"Searching for: [Role] | Location: [Location] | Key skills: [Skills] | Seniority: [Seniority]

Platforms to search: LinkedIn, Indeed, GitHub (for technical roles), AngelList / Wellfound, and professional communities.

  • Start search
  • Adjust parameters first"

Step 2: WSA Discovery

Discover available Web Search Agents for candidate-sourcing platforms. Run simultaneously:

nimble extract:templates list --limit 100  # then filter items for "linkedin people"
nimble extract:templates list --limit 100  # then filter items for "indeed resume"
nimble extract:templates list --limit 100  # then filter items for "github profile"
nimble extract:templates list --limit 100  # then filter items for "wellfound talent"

Filter results for entity_type: SERP or entity_type: PDP. Prefer managed_by: "nimble". Validate promising agents with:

nimble extract:templates get --extract-template-name {name}

Cache discovered WSA names and required params. If no WSAs found for a platform, fall back to nimble search for that platform.

Step 3: Parallel Candidate Search (Sub-Agents)

Spawn nimble-researcher agents (agents/nimble-researcher.md) with mode: "bypassPermissions", max 4 concurrent. Assign one agent per platform:

Agent 1 — LinkedIn

Search for people matching the role criteria. Use Boolean-style query construction:

nimble search --query "site:linkedin.com/in [Role] [Location] [Key Skills]" \
  --max-results 15 --search-depth fast
nimble search --query "[Role] [Location] linkedin profile [Skill1] [Skill2]" \
  --max-results 10 --search-depth fast

If a LinkedIn WSA was discovered in Step 2, use it instead with the role title, location, and skill keywords as inputs.

Agent 2 — Indeed / Resumes

nimble search --query "site:indeed.com resume [Role] [Location] [Key Skills]" \
  --max-results 10 --search-depth fast
nimble search --query "[Role] resume [Location] [Key Skills]" \
  --max-results 10 --search-depth fast

Agent 3 — GitHub (technical roles only)

Skip this agent for non-technical roles (e.g. Sales, Marketing, Operations).

nimble search --query "site:github.com [Role] [Location] [Key Skills]" \
  --max-results 10 --search-depth fast
nimble search --query "github [Key Skills] developer [Location] open to work" \
  --max-results 10 --search-depth fast

Agent 4 — AngelList / Wellfound + Communities

nimble search --query "site:wellfound.com [Role] [Location] [Key Skills]" \
  --max-results 10 --search-depth fast
nimble search --query "[Role] [Location] open to work OR seeking opportunities \
  [Key Skills]" --max-results 10 --search-depth fast

Each agent returns: candidate name (if available), profile URL, current title, location snippet, inferred skills, availability signals ("open to work", "seeking", "available") with event date (if available) and source URL.

Step 4: Deep Profile Extraction

For the top candidates identified in Step 3 (aim for 10–20 unique profiles across all platforms), extract full profile details. Run all extractions simultaneously:

nimble extract --url "[profile-url]" --format markdown

From each extracted profile, pull:

  • Full name
  • Current role & company
  • Location
  • Skills / tech stack
  • Experience summary (years, notable employers)
  • Education
  • Availability signals (open to work, recent job change, posting activity)
  • Contact signals (email, personal site, GitHub handle)

For extraction failures, follow the fallback pattern in references/nimble-playbook.md. If a profile is behind a login wall and extraction fails, keep the search-snippet summary instead — do not skip the candidate.

Extraction budget: extract up to 15 profiles. If more than 15 candidates were found in Step 3, prioritize by relevance score (seniority match + skill overlap + location match) before extracting.

Step 5: Score & Rank Candidates

Score each candidate (1–10) using these weighted signals:

SignalWeight
Role / title match30%
Skill overlap with requirements30%
Location match20%
Seniority match10%
Availability signals10%

Group candidates into tiers:

  • Tier 1 (Strong match, 7–10): All required signals present
  • Tier 2 (Partial match, 4–6): Most signals present, 1–2 gaps
  • Tier 3 (Stretch, 1–3): Worth reviewing if Tier 1/2 list is thin

Step 6: Output

Before presenting results, check ~/.nimble/memory/talent-sourcing/[role-slug].md — if a candidate was surfaced in a prior run, mark them (previously surfaced) rather than re-presenting them as new.

Present a structured candidate report:

## Candidate Report: [Role] in [Location]
Searched: LinkedIn, Indeed, GitHub, Wellfound
Found: [N] candidates | Tier 1: [N] | Tier 2: [N] | Tier 3: [N]

**TL;DR:** [2-3 sentence summary of the strongest candidates and any notable patterns]

---

### Tier 1 — Strong Match

#### 1. [Name] — [Score]/10
- **Current role:** [Title] at [Company]
- **Location:** [Location]
- **Skills:** [Skill1], [Skill2], [Skill3]
- **Experience:** [X years, notable employers]
- **Availability:** [signal] — [event date or "date unknown"] — [source URL]
- **Profile:** [URL]
- **Contact signals:** [email / personal site / GitHub]

...

---

### What This Means
[1-2 sentences on hiring outlook: supply/demand signal, speed recommendation, any
standout sourcing channel]

Omit fields where data is unavailable. Do not fabricate details — use "unknown" for missing fields. Add a one-sentence "Why this candidate" note for each Tier 1 result.

Step 7: Save to Memory

Make all Write calls simultaneously:

  • Report → ~/.nimble/memory/reports/talent-sourcing-{YYYY-MM-DD}.md (full candidate report with all tiers)
  • Per-role → ~/.nimble/memory/talent-sourcing/[role-slug].md (candidate list; write or update)
  • Profile → update last_runs.talent-sourcing in ~/.nimble/business-profile.json using the python3 snippet in references/profile-and-onboarding.md. Skip if the file does not exist.

Update ~/.nimble/memory/talent-sourcing/index.md with a row for this search. Follow the wiki update pattern from references/memory-and-distribution.md.

Step 8: Share & Distribute

Always offer distribution — do not skip this step. Follow references/memory-and-distribution.md for connector detection, sharing flow, and source links enforcement.

Step 9: Follow-ups

Offer next steps using AskUserQuestion:

What's next?

  • Go deeper on a candidate — extract full profile + find contact info
  • Expand search — broaden location, relax seniority, try more platforms
  • Narrow search — add a required skill or tighten location
  • Export list — save as CSV or formatted doc
  • Done

Sibling skill suggestions:

  • Run company-deep-dive on a candidate's current employer for deal context
  • Run meeting-prep before reaching out to a Tier 1 candidate

Error Handling

See references/nimble-playbook.md for the standard error table. Skill-specific handling:

  • Profile behind login wall: Keep search-snippet summary; note "full profile unavailable — LinkedIn/Indeed login required" in the candidate entry.
  • < 5 total candidates found: Notify the user, suggest broadening location to remote or relaxing seniority, then ask whether to re-run with adjusted params.
  • Search 500 on a platform: Retry once with a simplified query; if still failing, skip that platform and note it in the report header.
  • GitHub agent skipped for non-technical role: Note "GitHub not searched for this role type" in the report header.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.