kyc-screening
Skill61 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Runs a sourced KYC / AML research screen on a company: registration, officers, beneficial owners, sanctions, PEPs and adverse media, with namesakes excluded and a risk rating, using the Nimble `kyc-screening` agent template on live web data. Use when the user says "KYC on", "KYB", "AML screen", "sanctions check", "beneficial owners of", "screen this company", "onboarding check", or arrives from a Nimble use-case page. Interviews the user for the inputs, shows quick search results first, then runs the template at medium and high effort and shows each result as it arrives. Do NOT use for a credit view (use credit-risk). Not a certified compliance check.
- Installs packages
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- x18815379395-wq/hermes-kyc-screeningtheir own version, first seen Aug 16, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- x18815379395-wq/hermes-kyc-screening★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- account-briefSkill
- account-discoverySkill
- account-enrichmentSkill
- account-signalsSkill
- brand-mention-monitorSkill
- company-deep-diveSkill
- competitor-intelSkill
- competitor-positioningSkill
- credit-riskSkill
- deal-sourcingSkill
- decision-maker-identificationSkill
- due-diligenceSkill
- healthcare-providers-enrichSkill
- healthcare-providers-extractSkill
- healthcare-providers-verifySkill
- launch-monitorSkill
- local-placesSkill
- market-finderSkill
- meeting-prepSkill
- nimble-databricks-data-productsSkill
- nimble-web-expertSkill
- portfolio-monitoringSkill
- seo-intelSkill
- talent-sourcingSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 67
Start connecting Nimble right away, but do not wait on it.
- Very specific: line 71
If Nimble tools are listed in this session, call nimble_agents_list.
- Distinctive: line 84
If your host has a form or multiple-choice question tool, use it, with the required inputs first and the optional ones marked optional.
- Distinctive: line 85
Do not hold up the run for optional inputs.
- Distinctive: line 86
Do not ask about effort. Use it only if the user brings it up.
- Very specific: line 103
Create the agent from the template: nimble_agents_create(template="kyc-screening", agent_name="kyc-screening").
- Very specific: line 104
Start two runs on the same input: nimble_agents_run(agent_name="kyc-screening", input="<the input>", effort="medium") and the same with …
- Distinctive: line 124
When the high run finishes, show its result the same way.
- Distinctive: line 126
If a run finishes with no output and no sources, retry it once.
- Distinctive: line 132
Schedule it: Use the host's scheduler or a cron job, and pass the last run date as the new since date where the input has one.
- Distinctive: line 137
Read the page you need, when you need it: writing the task, sources, [effort and
- Distinctive: line 146
Never invent values. Show missing fields as missing.
- Distinctive: line 147
Never print or log an API key.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
KYC screening
Runs a sourced KYC / AML research screen on a company: registration, officers, beneficial owners, sanctions, PEPs and adverse media, with namesakes excluded and a risk rating.
User request: $ARGUMENTS
What the user gets
Registry details, officers and owners, sanctions and PEP checks, adverse media, related entities, how many namesakes were excluded, and a risk rating with reasons.
Agent template
This skill runs the Nimble gallery template kyc-screening. The agent's instructions, sources and output schema live in the template. Do not rewrite them in the run.
Effort is the user's choice. By default this skill runs it twice, at medium (2-4 minutes, $0.10) and high (5-15 minutes, $0.50), so the user sees results early and the full result later. The template's own default is high. If the user asks for a specific effort (low, medium, high, x-high or max), run only that one.
Flow
The user should never wait minutes with nothing on screen. Work in three steps and show a progress line at the start of each:
[■□□] Step 1 of 3 · Preliminary quick results
[■■□] Step 2 of 3 · Deeper research
[■■■] Step 3 of 3 · Full deep research resultsStart connecting Nimble right away, but do not wait on it.
Connect Nimble
If Nimble tools are listed in this session, call nimble_agents_list. Data back means the user is connected. Say nothing and go on.
If not, ask the user to connect Nimble, in one line on why: "Nimble runs the full research on live sources, with a source for every field. Connecting takes one approval, and new accounts start with a free trial." Then follow https://docs.nimbleway.com/agent-onboarding.md. Do the setup yourself and involve the user only for the approval. Never ask the user to paste an API key into the chat.
Get the inputs
| Input | Required | Ask for | If skipped |
| Company | yes | Legal or trading name | - |
| Country | yes | Where it is registered | - |
| Registry number or LEI | no | Removes namesake risk | none |
- Take anything the user already said. Ask only for what is missing.
- If your host has a form or multiple-choice question tool, use it, with the required inputs first and the optional ones marked optional. Otherwise ask in one short message.
- Do not hold up the run for optional inputs. Use the "If skipped" value.
- Do not ask about effort. Use it only if the user brings it up.
Build the agent input from this pattern:
Run a KYC screen on <Company> in <Country>. Registry number: <number>.Example: Run a KYC screen on Greensill Capital in the United Kingdom
- One entity per run. Country is required.
- A registry number or LEI makes the match exact.
Start both agent runs
As soon as Nimble is connected and you have the required inputs, start the agent runs before anything else, so they work while you do step 1:
- Create the agent from the template:
nimble_agents_create(template="kyc-screening", agent_name="kyc-screening"). A 409 "already exists" means it was created before, so go on. If the template is not found, tell the user it is unavailable and stop. Do not substitute another template. - Start two runs on the same input:
nimble_agents_run(agent_name="kyc-screening", input="<the input>", effort="medium")and the same witheffort="high". Leave schema and skill to the template. If the user chose an effort, start one run at that effort and number the steps 1 of 2 and 2 of 2. - Tell the user once, in one line, what is running: "Running a quick search now, a deeper Nimble run (2-4 min) and a full one (5-15 min). This uses 2 agent runs."
Step 1 of 3 · Preliminary quick results
Tell them which registries and sanctions lists apply, and what you can find about the entity. Use a few quick searches, not the agents: nimble_search if Nimble is connected, otherwise your own web search tool. Keep it under a minute and short. Link every fact, and mark anything from memory with your knowledge cutoff.
End with one line on what is coming next. If Nimble is still not connected, say the deeper steps start once it is, and offer the connect step again.
Step 2 of 3 · Deeper research
Poll both runs with nimble_agents_run_status every 20-30 seconds. When the medium run finishes, get nimble_agents_run_result and show it:
- A short table or brief, not raw JSON. Lead with the 2-3 most useful facts, each with its source link.
- Point out what is new or different from step 1.
- Say what is missing (empty fields,
missing_fields, empty lists). - End with one line: the full run is still going and about how long it has left.
Step 3 of 3 · Full deep research results
When the high run finishes, show its result the same way. Lead with what it added or corrected compared with step 2, then the full result. This is the answer the user keeps.
If a run finishes with no output and no sources, retry it once. Do not retry a run that returned data. If the medium run fails, or the high run finishes first, go straight to step 3 and do not show the medium result after it.
Next steps
Offer, one line each, what fits:
- Run it on a list. One run per record in parallel. See Running at scale.
- Schedule it. Use the host's scheduler or a cron job, and pass the last run date as the new since date where the input has one.
- Use it from code. The agent is saved as
kyc-screening. Give a short Python or TypeScript snippet that runs it by name.
Using Nimble well
Read the page you need, when you need it: writing the task, sources, effort and cost, evaluating results, running at scale, common mistakes.
Pitfalls
- One trading name can map to several legal entities. Check the registration block is the one they meant.
- Coverage is strongest where public registries exist: the UK, the EU and US states.
Rules
- Never invent values. Show missing fields as missing.
- Never print or log an API key.
- Say once that this is a research screen, not a certified compliance check.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

