agentleFS
NimblewayNimbleway/agent-skills/skills/nimble-databricks-data-products/SKILL.md

nimble-databricks-data-products

Skill61 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Builds Databricks data products from live web data, end to end: discovers the right Nimble web-data agents, scrapes into Delta tables, and produces an AI/BI dashboard and/or a deployed Databricks App — a table → dashboard → app workflow, for production data products or quick demos. Use whenever a request pairs live or scraped web data WITH a Databricks destination — e.g. "scrape Amazon/Walmart prices into a Delta table and build a dashboard", "load Zillow/Instagram/Maps/search results into Databricks and build a dashboard or app", "showcase Nimble + Databricks to a prospect". Prefer it over nimble-web-expert or competitor-intel when the data lands in Databricks. Do NOT use for one-off web fetches or CSV exports with no Databricks destination — use nimble-web-expert instead. Do NOT use for competitor or company research briefings — use competitor-intel or company-deep-dive instead. Do NOT use for generic Databricks work with no Nimble/web-data angle — use the official databricks-* skills instead.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Discover, don't assume: Read agent names via nimble_agent_list(), input params via nimble_agent_describe('<agent>'), and output fields by …

    line 45
  2. Distinctive:

    Probe before fanning out: Run one call per source first to learn its localization flag, field names, and value formats — sources differ …

    line 48
  3. Distinctive:

    Fail fast, then confirm: Run Phase 0 preflight first.

    line 52
  4. Distinctive:

    Leave artifacts in place: No teardown.

    line 55
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep the brief's intent (the "analysis goal") — it picks the Phase 4 template and the headline.

    line 84
  6. Very specific:

    Probe ONE call per source first (fail fast): Before fanning out, run a single nimble_agent_run per source and check: status, the real field …

    line 98
  7. Very specific:

    Create a control (queries) table <schema>.<table>_queries (source, agent, keyword, params_json, localization, enabled) and seed one row per …

    line 103
  8. Very specific:

    Create the unified results table (source column + normalized core + raw VARIANT).

    line 107
  9. Very specific:

    Run one INSERT that calls nimble_agent_run(q.agent, q.params_json, q.localization) via a correlated LATERAL join over the control table, …

    line 108
  10. Distinctive:

    Comparison depth (hybrid): always build the aggregate/category comparison.

    line 129

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Nimble on Databricks — data products builder

Turn a natural-language brief like pricing analysis on dog products from walmart and amazon into working Databricks data products: discover agents → ingest live web search data into Delta → build dashboard and/or app → deliver links. Equally at home for a quick demo or a real, reusable data product.

You are the orchestrator. Databricks mechanics are delegated to the official databricks-* skills (see references/databricks-skills.md); this skill owns the Nimble glue and the gaps (agent discovery, ingestion-from-agents, the AI/BI dashboard JSON, branding).

Golden rules

  • Discover, don't assume. Read agent names via nimble_agent_list(), input params via nimble_agent_describe('<agent>'), and output fields by probing one call (to_json(parsing[0])) — never hardcode from memory (Amazon search takes keyword, not query).
  • Probe before fanning out. Run one call per source first to learn its localization flag, field names, and value formats — sources differ (some return numeric prices, others currency strings).
  • One statement per Statements API call. Multiple ;-separated statements in one call are a parse error.
  • Each Bash call is a fresh shell. Env vars and cd don't persist — set them inline. See references/preflight.md.
  • Fail fast, then confirm. Run Phase 0 preflight first; recommend a warehouse + writable schema, then confirm before writing.
  • Always ask the deliverable. Table / +dashboard / +app is a per-run choice.
  • Branding is always on, neutral. "Powered by Nimble" + light theme + yellow accent. See references/branding.md.
  • Leave artifacts in place. No teardown.
  • Show your work and the headline. End with URLs and the one-sentence insight (e.g. the price gap).

Workflow

Track these as todos so nothing is skipped.

Phase 0 — Preflight (read-only, fail fast)

Lean on the databricks-core skill for the generic checks.

  1. databricks current-user me → confirm auth; capture the username (for the default schema).
  2. Find a RUNNING SQL warehouse: databricks warehouses list. Prefer one already RUNNING; if none, offer to start one.
  3. Integration gate — confirm these exist: nimble_integration.tools.{nimble_search, nimble_extract, nimble_agent_run, nimble_agent_list, nimble_agent_describe}. Quick check: databricks functions list nimble_integration tools. If missing → STOP and walk the user through references/install-nimble-integration.md (Nimble cookbook). Do not try to auto-install.
  4. Recommend + confirm the target: a warehouse and a writable catalog.schema (default users.<username>). Verify writability — some shared catalogs deny CREATE TABLE. Present the recommendation and let the user confirm or override before writing.

Details + exact commands: references/preflight.md.

Phase 1 — Interpret the brief + clarify (AskUserQuestion)

Parse the brief into: domain/entity · search terms · sources · analysis goal. Then ask (batch into one AskUserQuestion call):

  • Deliverable — always ask: table / table + dashboard / table + dashboard + app.
  • Sources — confirm the agents you matched (e.g. Amazon + Walmart SERP).
  • Volume — default ~8–10 search terms, ~100+ rows/source.

Keep the brief's intent (the "analysis goal") — it picks the Phase 4 template and the headline.

Phase 2 — Discover agents + map a unified schema

See references/nimble-agents.md.

  1. nimble_agent_list() via SQL, filter by the source/domain keywords.
  2. For each chosen agent: nimble_agent_describe('<name>') → read its input params (required ones, exact names, localization/pagination flags). Output fields come from the §2.5 probe, not here.
  3. Design one unified table with a source column + a normalized core (product_name, price, currency, rating, review_count, brand, url, …), keeping only fields the chosen agents actually emit. Multi-source comparison hinges on the shared columns.

Phase 3 — Ingest (control table + one set-based call)

See references/nimble-agents.md for the full SQL. Drive ingestion from a control table, not per-keyword files — it's reproducible and expandable (add a row, re-run). 0. Probe ONE call per source first (fail fast). Before fanning out, run a single nimble_agent_run per source and check: status, the real field names, the localization flag, and whether a price casts cleanly. This catches the Walmart-class surprises (localization, currency- string prices, product_price vs price) in ~40s instead of after a wasted full round. Highest- leverage step — see nimble-agents.md §2.5.

  1. Create a control (queries) table <schema>.<table>_queries (source, agent, keyword, params_json, localization, enabled) and seed one row per (source × term). params_json uses each agent's real param name (from input_properties); set localization per agent (e.g. amazon_serp true, walmart_serp false).
  2. Create the unified results table (source column + normalized core + raw VARIANT).
  3. Run one INSERT that calls nimble_agent_run(q.agent, q.params_json, q.localization) via a correlated LATERAL join over the control table, with a /*+ REPARTITION(N) */ hint (N ≈ enabled rows, kept modest — high parallelism can trip API rate limits) so the agent calls run in parallel. It's one long statement → run it async with bash scripts/ingest.sh <WH> ingest.sql.
  4. Reconcile against the control table (LEFT JOIN): a term that lands no items returns an empty result, and a correlated LATERAL drops empty rows — so reconcile to confirm every source is covered. If a source shows 0, re-check its localization flag (per-agent) and casts before building; see nimble-agents.md §6 for the diagnostic order.

Phase 4 — Build the deliverable(s)

Choose a template from the matched agents' vertical/entity_type:

VerticalDashboard/app shape
Ecommerce (SERP/PDP/CLP)KPIs; listings & avg price by source/keyword; sponsored share; price-vs-rating scatter; product table with Open links; multi-source → comparison bars + best-effort item-level price gap
Socialvolume/engagement by account/post; top-content table; like/follower distributions
Real Estateprice & price/sqft; listings by location; beds/baths breakdowns
Maps / Localavg rating; review counts; places table
LLM / AEOsource/answer presence; share-of-voice; citation table
fallbackKPIs + 2 categorical bars + the raw table (works off any output_schema)

Comparison depth (hybrid): always build the aggregate/category comparison; additionally try best-effort item-level matching across sources (normalize brand + key tokens). If confident matches exist, add a "same-product price gap" view; otherwise keep the aggregate comparison and note that item-level matching wasn't confident.

  • Dashboard → use scripts/build_dashboard.py (compact spec → valid serialized_dashboard, create + publish). It bakes in every Lakeview gotcha. Read references/dashboard-cookbook.md for the spec format and recipes.
  • App → follow references/app-cookbook.md (delegates scaffold/deploy to databricks-apps; adds the Nimble-specific SQL, branding, and the numeric-string / light-mode gotchas).
  • Branding → references/branding.md (always applied).

Phase 5 — Verify, deliver & share

  • Publish the dashboard / confirm the app is RUNNING; collect URLs.
  • Summarize what was built and the headline insight (the comparison takeaway).
  • Offer to share the dashboard/app link — if a Slack or Notion connector is available, offer to post it there (Slack = the link + headline; Notion = a short dated page). Mention once; don't nag.
  • Suggest next steps with sibling skills, e.g. competitor-intel / company-deep-dive for business signals on the brands surfaced, or nimble-web-expert for a one-off deeper pull.
  • Offer iterations (more charts, item-level matching, theming, a scheduled refresh job).

Reference map

  • references/databricks-skills.md — which official databricks-* skill to use per phase.
  • references/install-nimble-integration.md — setup when the integration gate fails.
  • references/preflight.md — auth, warehouse, writable-schema discovery (exact commands).
  • references/nimble-agents.md — discovery, schema mapping, ingestion SQL + gotchas.
  • references/dashboard-cookbook.md — Lakeview JSON recipes + every gotcha (authoritative).
  • references/app-cookbook.md — AppKit demo app glue + gotchas.
  • references/branding.md — "Powered by Nimble", logo, colors.
  • scripts/ingest.sh — async statement fan-out + poll.
  • scripts/build_dashboard.py — compact spec → create + publish a dashboard.
  • assets/nimble-logo.png — the Nimble mark for app branding.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.