agentleFS
MakiDevelopMakiDevelop/claude-skills/skills/case-study/SKILL.md

case-study

Skill3 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

專案案例包裝。把真實專案包裝成面試/LinkedIn 用的結構化案例(問題→方案→架構→Tech Stack→成果→展示重點)。當用戶說「包裝案例」「寫 case study」「面試用的案例」時使用。

17 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use audit.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • OpenAISkill

    audit

    Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Files
SKILL.md

專案案例包裝

目標

把一個真實專案包裝成結構化的案例包,可直接用於面試、LinkedIn、或作品集。

與其他 Skill 的差異

  • demo-storytelling:PoC → 演示腳本(給觀眾看的故事)
  • case-study:完整專案 → 結構化案例(給面試官/讀者的事實)
  • product-positioning:產品 → 市場定位(給客戶的訊息)

輸入

從 $ARGUMENTS 或對話中取得:

欄位必填說明
專案名稱是名稱或 repo 路徑
目標用途否預設:面試 + LinkedIn 雙用
受眾否預設:技術主管 / HR / 資深工程師

若缺專案名稱,問用戶。

資訊收集流程

Step 1: 自動偵測專案資訊

若提供 repo 路徑:

  1. 讀 README.md / CLAUDE.md
  2. git log --oneline -20 看開發歷史
  3. git log --oneline --since="6 months ago" | wc -l 算活躍度
  4. Glob 看主要檔案結構

若只提供名稱:

  1. 問用戶補充背景資訊

Step 2: 量化指標挖掘

主動嘗試取得以下數字(能自動抓就抓,不能就標 _(待填)_):

  • 程式碼統計:cloc 或 find . -name "*.py" | wc -l
  • 測試數:grep -r "def test_" | wc -l
  • 部署環境數
  • 服務使用者數(問用戶)
  • 效能改善數字(問用戶)
  • 節省時間/成本(問用戶)

Step 3: 問用戶補充

自動收集完後,列出缺少的關鍵數字,一次問完:

以下數字我無法自動取得,請補充(沒有的寫「無」):
1. 服務使用者數:
2. 每日/月處理量:
3. 節省的時間或成本:
4. 其他你想強調的成果:

輸出格式

# 案例:{專案名} — {一句話定位}

> 面試 / LinkedIn 用案例包

## 問題

{2-3 個 bullet,描述要解決什麼問題}

## 解決方案

{方案概述 + 3-4 個關鍵設計決策}

## 技術架構

{ASCII 或文字描述的架構圖}

## Technology Stack

| 層級 | 技術 |
|------|------|
| ... | ... |

## 成果

{帶數字的成果列表}

## 展示重點(面試時強調)

1. **{能力標籤}**:{一句話說明}
2. ...
3. ...
4. ...

Quality Gates

  • 問題描述是業務痛點,不是技術描述
  • 架構圖清晰可懂(非工程師也能看懂大致結構)
  • Tech Stack 表完整(每一層都有)
  • 成果數字有來源;缺少時標待補或使用可核實的定性結果,不為湊數字而編造
  • 展示重點對應市場需求(Product 思維 / Engineering / AI 實戰)
  • 沒有公司機密或敏感資訊

Heuristics

  • 問題描述用「用戶/團隊遇到什麼困難」,不用「我想做一個...」
  • 相對改善須附基準、測量條件與前後絕對值;沒有測量時不宣稱倍數或百分比
  • 展示重點最多 4 個,太多 = 沒重點
  • 如果專案太小不值得包裝 → 告訴用戶,建議合併到其他案例

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.