migration-validator
Skill5 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Safety verification checklist for C-to-Rust migrations. Validates compilation, unsafe block minimization, memory safety, API compatibility, and idiomatic Rust patterns. Use when: validate migration, check Rust safety, verify converted code, migration QA.
In this repository29 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/architect/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- skills/council/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-browserSkill
- app-store-screenshotsSkill
- architectSkill
- architecture-reviewerSkill
- c-cpp-analyzerSkill
- councilSkill
- c-to-rust-migrationSkill
- demo-pipelineSkill
- e2e-pipelineSkill
- founder-modeSkill
- full-evalSkill
- hackathon-jurySkill
- idea-labSkill
- ios-glass-ui-designerSkill
- learn-by-mistakeSkill
- maestro-mobile-testingSkill
- mobile-design-systemSkill
- noricum-devSkill
- oss-readinessSkill
- pdf-presentationSkill
- playwright-recordingSkill
- post-run-analysisSkill
- rust-migrationSkill
- ui-ux-polishSkill
- vc-evaluatorSkill
- webreelSkill
- youtube-devrelSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 51
If repair adds unsafe → reject that iteration, try again
- Distinctive: line 55
Keep the version with highest score throughout repair loop
- Distinctive: line 56
If nothing passes validation, use best version as fallback (not raw c2rust)
- Distinctive: line 57
Prefer: compiling version > high-score non-compiling > c2rust fallback
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Migration Validation Checklist
Compilation Check
- Rust code compiles with
rustc --edition 2024 - No errors, only warnings acceptable if minor
- Clippy passes with 0 warnings (
cargo clippy)
Safety Check
- Count
unsafeblocks (target: 0 for easy/medium, minimize for hard) - Every
unsafeblock has a// SAFETY:comment - No raw pointer dereferences without bounds checking
- No transmute unless absolutely necessary
- No
unwrap()on user-controlled data
Semantic Equivalence
- Same function signature (equivalent types)
- Same behavior for all valid inputs
- Same error conditions / edge cases
- Overflow behavior matches (wrapping vs. checked)
- Printf format matches exactly (especially
%g→ custom format_g()) - Bool/int distinction preserved (C
int0/1 ≠ Rustbool)
Differential Testing
- Compile C with
cc -std=gnu11 -lm - Compile Rust with
rustc --edition 2024 - Run both with identical test inputs
- Compare outputs byte-by-byte (not just "looks similar")
- Test edge cases: empty input, max values, null/None, negative numbers
- Float tolerance: exact match preferred, tolerance only for known precision differences
Idiomatic Score
Enhanced formula with positive AND negative signals:
- Base: 100
- Negative:
- (unsafe_blocks * 10) - (clippy_warnings * 2) - (unwrap_count * 3) - (as_casts * 1) - Positive:
+ min(10, result_count * 2) + min(5, option_count) + min(5, iter_usage) - Ranges: 90-100 Excellent, 70-89 Good, 60-69 Acceptable, <60 Needs repair
Quality Floor (P0)
- Track baseline unsafe count from initial translation
- NEVER allow repair to increase unsafe above baseline
- If repair adds unsafe → reject that iteration, try again
- This prevents the "oscillation" problem where repair trades quality for compilation
Best-Version Tracking (P1)
- Keep the version with highest score throughout repair loop
- If nothing passes validation, use best version as fallback (not raw c2rust)
- Prefer: compiling version > high-score non-compiling > c2rust fallback
Repair Loop Rules
- Effective iterations scale with file size:
- <1000 LOC: full configured max (default 5)
- 1000-2000 LOC: min(configured, 3)
2000 LOC: min(configured, 2)
- Chunked translations: max(configured, 8) — chunks are small, repair is affordable
- Stall detection: 2 unchanged error counts → re-translate at temp 0.7
- Temperature ramp: base 0.2 + 0.1 per iteration (capped at 1.0)
- Quality gate: if initial translation has >5 unsafe → re-translate at temp 0.5
- P5: Idiomatic hints — when compiles + diff passes but score < threshold, repair agent gets refactoring hints instead of empty feedback (prevents wasted iterations)
Validated Production Migrations
These fixtures are regression-tested and represent known-good migrations:
| File | LOC C→Rust | Score | Unsafe | Notes |
| add, power, gcd, etc. | <50 | 100 | 0 | Simple arithmetic |
| hash_table.c | 204→~200 | 81 | 0 | malloc/free → Box/Vec |
| cjson_combined.c | 520→319 | 100 | 0 | JSON parser, recursive data |
| expr_eval.c | 1686→1446 | 100 | 0 | 74 functions, recursive descent |
| cjson_full_combined.c | 1696→1439 | 100* | 0 | Full cJSON library (49/78 fns) |
| picohttpparser.c | 1102→1551 | 100 | 0 | HTTP parser, state machine |
| genann_combined.c | 642→622 | 100 | 0 | Neural network, fn ptrs→enum, autonomous pipeline |
| olive_combined.c | 1443→1176 | 100 | 0 | 2D graphics, pixel buffers, checksum diff test |
| http_parser_combined.c | 3680→1492 | N/A | 0 | HTTP parser, goto state machine→line parsing, manual completion |
| miniz_core_standalone.c | 4429 | N/A | N/A | FallbackUnsafe (ceiling case) |
Powered by Noricum — autonomous C/C++ to Rust migration agent
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

