agentleFS
JuanMarchettoJuanMarchetto/agent-skills/skills/c-to-rust-migration/SKILL.md

c-to-rust-migration

Skill5 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Complete C/C++ to Rust migration pipeline. Analyzes code difficulty, converts to idiomatic safe Rust, and validates the result. Covers memory management, pointer translation, error handling, unsafe minimization, and differential testing. Use when: migrate C to Rust, rewrite in Rust, C to Rust conversion, Rust migration, convert C code, C2Rust, unsafe Rust reduction.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Quality gate: If translation produces >5 unsafe blocks, re-attempt with lower temperature (0.5) focusing on the unsafe sections.

    line 73
  2. Distinctive:

    Quality floor: Never accept a version that scores lower than the current best.

    line 87

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

C to Rust Migration

Complete pipeline for migrating C/C++ codebases to safe, idiomatic Rust. Covers analysis, conversion, and validation in three phases.

Pipeline

C/C++ Source
    |
Phase 1: ANALYZE
    | Classify difficulty (easy/medium/hard)
    | Detect patterns (pointers, macros, goto, unions)
    | Plan conversion strategy
    |
Phase 2: CONVERT
    | Apply migration patterns
    | Memory management → ownership/borrowing
    | Error codes → Result<T, E>
    | Pointer arithmetic → slices/iterators
    | Quality gate: re-translate if >5 unsafe blocks
    |
Phase 3: VALIDATE
    | Compilation check (edition 2024)
    | Unsafe minimization (target: 0 for easy/medium)
    | Clippy with 0 warnings
    | Differential testing (same I/O as original C)
    | Idiomatic score calculation
    |
Safe, Idiomatic Rust

Phase 1: Analysis

Classify each function by migration difficulty:

DifficultyPatternsStrategy
EasyPure functions, simple arithmetic, no pointers, <30 linesDirect translation, should produce 0 unsafe
MediumPointer parameters, simple structs, bounded arrays, malloc with clear ownershipTranslate with ownership patterns, minimize unsafe
Hardvoid*, function pointers, unions, goto, complex lifetimes, macro-heavyMay need C2Rust as starting point, then iterative cleanup

Hard signals (any one → Hard): goto, setjmp/longjmp, variadic functions, inline assembly, complex #define macros with side effects.

See references/analysis-patterns.md for the complete pattern catalog.

Phase 2: Conversion Patterns

Core translations:

C PatternRust Pattern
malloc/freeVec, Box, or stack allocation
char* strings&str, String, CStr
int error codesResult<T, Error> with thiserror
NULL checksOption<T>
Array + length paramsSlices (&[T])
void*Generics or enum dispatch
Function pointersFn traits or enum dispatch
struct with init/freeimpl with new() + Drop
Global mutable stateOnceLock, Mutex, or dependency injection
goto cleanupDrop guards or ? operator

Quality gate: If translation produces >5 unsafe blocks, re-attempt with lower temperature (0.5) focusing on the unsafe sections.

See references/conversion-patterns.md for detailed examples from real migrations.

Phase 3: Validation

Checklist (in order):

  1. Compilation: cargo build with edition 2024, zero errors
  2. Clippy: cargo clippy with zero warnings
  3. Unsafe audit: Count unsafe blocks. Every one needs a // SAFETY: comment explaining why it's sound
  4. Differential testing: Same inputs → same outputs as original C code
  5. Idiomatic score: (1 - unsafe_blocks/total_functions) * 0.4 + clippy_clean * 0.3 + has_tests * 0.2 + has_docs * 0.1

Quality floor: Never accept a version that scores lower than the current best. If a fix attempt reduces the score, discard it.

See references/validation-checklist.md for the complete validation protocol.

Example Output

C-to-Rust Migration Report — http_parser.c

Analysis:
  Total functions: 23
  Easy: 8 | Medium: 11 | Hard: 4
  Hard patterns: 2 goto statements, 1 union, 1 function pointer dispatch

Conversion:
  Functions migrated: 23/23
  Unsafe blocks: 2 (both in FFI boundary — justified)
  Idiomatic patterns applied: Result<T,E>, Option<T>, iterators, Drop guards

Validation:
  ✅ Compiles (edition 2024)
  ✅ Clippy: 0 warnings
  ✅ Unsafe: 2 blocks, both with SAFETY comments
  ✅ Diff tests: 47/47 passing (100%)
  Idiomatic score: 0.91/1.0

Quality: EXCELLENT — ready for production use

Error Handling

  • C code doesn't compile: Need the original build system info (Makefile, CMakeLists.txt) to understand dependencies and flags
  • Too many unsafe blocks: Re-attempt conversion focusing on the unsafe sections. Consider if some are FFI boundaries (justified) vs unnecessary
  • Diff tests fail: Compare output byte-by-byte. Common causes: endianness, floating point precision, uninitialized memory in C
  • Circular dependencies: Rust doesn't allow circular module deps. Restructure with traits or merge modules

Origin

Patterns extracted from real-world C-to-Rust migrations of open-source libraries: cJSON, genann, http-parser, picohttpparser, olive.c.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.