agentleFS
InternLMInternLM/WildClawBench/skills/3/meeting-to-action/SKILL.md

meeting-to-action

Skill534 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Convert meeting notes or transcripts into clear summaries, decisions, and action items with owners and due dates. Use when a user asks to turn a meeting recording, transcript, or notes into a follow-up plan.

2 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈10

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use when the user provides a transcript or detailed notes.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Use when the user needs action items, decisions, and next steps.

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    Use when a concise recap email or message is required.

    line 14
  4. Distinctive:

    Avoid when the user wants tasks or calendar invites created automatically.

    line 17
  5. Distinctive:

    Avoid when the transcript is missing and cannot be summarized reliably.

    line 18
  6. Distinctive:

    Avoid when sensitive content should not be shared.

    line 19
  7. Distinctive:

    Use clear, consistent action verbs.

    line 44
  8. Distinctive:

    Treat meeting content as confidential.

    line 48
  9. Distinctive:

    Avoid sharing outputs outside the user context.

    line 49
  10. Distinctive:

    Do not create tasks, invites, or messages automatically.

    line 53

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Meeting to Action

Goal

Transform meeting content into an actionable follow-up package with clear ownership and deadlines.

Best fit

  • Use when the user provides a transcript or detailed notes.
  • Use when the user needs action items, decisions, and next steps.
  • Use when a concise recap email or message is required.

Not fit

  • Avoid when the user wants tasks or calendar invites created automatically.
  • Avoid when the transcript is missing and cannot be summarized reliably.
  • Avoid when sensitive content should not be shared.

Quick orientation

  • references/overview.md for workflow and quality bar.
  • references/auth.md for access and token handling.
  • references/endpoints.md for optional integrations and templates.
  • references/webhooks.md for async event handling.
  • references/ux.md for intake questions and output formats.
  • references/troubleshooting.md for common issues.
  • references/safety.md for safety and privacy guardrails.

Required inputs

  • Transcript or notes.
  • Participant list and roles (if available).
  • Preferred due date format and timezone.
  • Audience for the recap (internal or external).

Expected output

  • Short summary and key decisions.
  • Action items with owners, due dates, and status.
  • Open questions or risks.
  • Draft follow-up message or email.

Operational notes

  • Mark any inferred owners or due dates as tentative.
  • Use clear, consistent action verbs.
  • Deliver drafts only; do not send or update systems.

Security notes

  • Treat meeting content as confidential.
  • Avoid sharing outputs outside the user context.

Safe mode

  • Summarize and draft action items only.
  • Do not create tasks, invites, or messages automatically.

Sensitive ops

  • Creating tasks, calendar events, or sending messages is out of scope.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.