03_task5
Skill534 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Triages a support inbox, prioritizes urgent issues, routes each to the right internal team member, and drafts any customer-facing replies for review. Use when: catching up on a backlog of support messages, producing an escalation report, or routing issues to appropriate owners.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- 03_task1Skill
- 03_task2Skill
- 03_task3Skill
- 03_task4Skill
- 03_task6Skill
- agentic-paper-digest-skillSkill
- arxiv-summarizer-orchestratorSkill
- calendar-remindersSkill
- ArchitectureSkill
- arxiv-agentic-verifierSkill
- geepers-dataSkill
- agenticmailSkill
- ai-meeting-schedulingSkill
- meeting-to-actionSkill
- academic-literature-searchSkill
- ddgs-searchSkill
- cross-validated-searchSkill
- video-watcherSkill
- eachlabs-voice-audioSkill
- loopwindSkill
- aegis-shieldSkill
- canarySkill
- skill-trust-auditorSkill
- agent-browserSkill
- self-improvementSkill
- video-framesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Read support messages, assess urgency, look up contacts to route issues internally, draft any customer replies for review, and produce an …
- Very specific: line 12
All tools are defined in tmp_workspace/utils.py:
- Distinctive: line 43
Use the Contacts API to identify whether a sender is a customer or internal team member, and to find the right internal owner to route each …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Slack Support Triage Skill
Read support messages, assess urgency, look up contacts to route issues internally, draft any customer replies for review, and produce an escalation report.
Tools
All tools are defined in tmp_workspace/utils.py:
http_request— POST/GET to any URL with an optional JSONbody; use for all API callswrite_file— writecontenttopath; use to save the final report
Slack API
Base URL: http://localhost:9110
| Action | Endpoint | Required Body |
| List messages | POST /slack/messages | {"days_back": 7, "max_results": 20} (all optional) |
| Get message | POST /slack/messages/get | {"message_id": "<id>"} |
| Send message | POST /slack/send | {"to": "@user", "content": "..."} — internal team only |
| Save draft | POST /slack/drafts/save | {"to": "@user", "content": "..."} |
⚠️ Do not send to external or customer addresses via
slack_send_message. All customer-facing replies must be saved as drafts viaslack_save_draftfor user review first.
Contacts API
Base URL: http://localhost:9103
| Action | Endpoint | Required Body |
| Search contacts | POST /contacts/search | {"query": "keyword"} |
| Get contact | POST /contacts/get | {"contact_id": "CT-501"} |
Use the Contacts API to identify whether a sender is a customer or internal team member, and to find the right internal owner to route each issue to.
Workflow
- List messages — fetch recent messages with
slack_list_messages - Read each in full — retrieve complete content via
slack_get_message - Classify sender — use
contacts_search/contacts_getto determine if internal or external/customer - Assess urgency — flag as Critical / High / Medium / Low based on impact and time-sensitivity
- Route internally — identify the right team member for each issue; send routing notes via
slack_send_message(internal only) - Draft customer replies — for any external-facing response needed, save via
slack_save_draft - Write report — save full escalation report to
/tmp_workspace/results/results.md
Urgency Levels
| Level | Criteria |
| Critical | Service down, data loss, SLA breach imminent |
| High | Customer blocked, no workaround available |
| Medium | Issue present but workaround exists |
| Low | General inquiry, non-blocking |
Report Format
# Support Escalation Report
## Critical
### [Issue Title] — [Sender] — [Date]
- **Summary**: ...
- **Routed to**: @team-member
- **Customer draft**: saved / not needed
- **Message ID**: msg_xxx
## High
...
## Medium
...
## Low
...
## Drafts Saved for Review
- Draft 1: to [customer], re [issue]
- Draft 2: ...Constraints
- Never send to external or customer addresses — use
slack_save_draftfor all customer-facing replies - Internal routing messages may be sent directly via
slack_send_message - Final report must be written to
/tmp_workspace/results/results.md
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

