seo-eeat
Skill81 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Audit and strengthen E-E-A-T and trust signals on a page — verify author identity/credentials (Person schema, byline, author page, sameAs), Organization about/contact/policies, visible experience/expertise markers, and transparency (sourcing, disclosures), and generate Person/Organization trust JSON-LD. Module M16. Feeds both the Search SEO and AI Visibility scores.
In this repository33 other files it gives its agents.
- auditSkill
- compareSkill
- fixSkill
- geoSkill
- scoreSkill
- seo-agent-readinessSkill
- seo-ai-crawlersSkill
- seo-ai-discoverySkill
- seo-core-web-vitalsSkill
- seo-crawlabilitySkill
- seo-crawl-renderSkill
- seo-ecommerceSkill
- seo-entity-linkingSkill
- seo-fix-applySkill
- seo-freshnessSkill
- seo-geo-answerblocksSkill
- seo-geo-factdensitySkill
- seo-headings-structureSkill
- seo-images-mediaSkill
- seo-indexabilitySkill
- seo-internal-linkingSkill
- seo-internationalSkill
- seo-localSkill
- seo-meta-onpageSkill
- seo-mobileSkill
- seo-orchestratorSkill
- seo-platform-detectSkill
- seo-renderingSkill
- seo-schema-jsonldSkill
- seo-scoreSkill
- seo-sitemapsSkill
- seo-social-cardsSkill
- seo-vertical-detectSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 29
When confirming an identity link or a live About/contact page requires a fetch that is unavailable, status is needs_api — never a false …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- Portions Copyright (c) 2026 Enrique Rocha (@soyenriquerocha) - see LICENSE for original authors · tododeia.com · id er-d03758e1 -->seo-eeat (M16)
Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trust are how both Google's quality systems and AI answer engines decide whether to rely on a page. Trust is foundational and now applies beyond YMYL. Schema details: references/schema-tier1.md.
Inputs
Work from the PageSnapshot named in your dispatch envelope: read parsed from <run_dir>/pages/<slug>.json (jsonld[], anchors[], text_sample); Grep pages/<slug>.html for verbatim evidence; site artifacts live in <run_dir>/site/{robots.json,sitemaps.json,discovery.json}. Deterministic findings already emitted by audit.mjs are listed in <run_dir>/findings.deterministic.json — do not re-emit those ids; add model-judged findings only. If invoked directly with a URL/path and no snapshot exists, first run node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/snapshot.mjs" <target> --out "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}/runs" and use the printed snapshot path.
Audits
Working from the PageSnapshot (parsed_rendered when render.used is not none, else parsed):
- Author identity & credentials: is there a visible byline? A
Personschema withname,jobTitle,knowsAbout, andsameAs[](LinkedIn/Wikidata)? Does the byline link to an author/bio page? Are credentials/experience stated, not just a name? - Organization trust: discoverable About and Contact pages; an
Organizationblock withname,url,logo,contactPoint,sameAs[]; visible editorial/privacy/returns policies appropriate to the vertical. - Experience & expertise markers: first-hand signals (original photos, "we tested", dates, methodology) and topical depth — not just generic prose.
- Transparency: sourcing/citations for claims, author disclosures (affiliate, sponsored, AI-assisted), last-reviewed dates. Defer the
sameAsidentity-graph detail to M6/seo-entity-linking.
Fixes
- AUTO (
fixable: auto): injectPerson(author) andOrganizationtrust JSON-LD built only from confirmed inputs — name, jobTitle, contactPoint, policy URLs the user supplies. The block is a diff forfix. - PROPOSED (
fixable: proposed): draft a byline link or asameAsset for per-item accept. - ADVISORY (
fixable: advisory): writing real author bios, About/contact pages, or editorial policies — the tool never authors these. Never fabricate names, credentials, dates, or identity links — ask the user or leave a clearly-markedTODOplaceholder.
Verification
- Offline:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/validate-jsonld.mjs" --snapshot <pages/<slug>.json>(or--url <u>) plusdom_assertfor visible byline/links/policy pages. - When confirming an identity link or a live About/contact page requires a fetch that is unavailable, status is
needs_api— never a falsepass.
Findings
Emit findings per schema/finding.schema.json; axis both. Severity policy: 5 is reserved for catastrophic, eligibility-killing facts at site/template scope; 4 major · 3 moderate · 2 minor · 1 cosmetic · 0 informational — and only an established severity-5 fail in an active category can cap a score (references/scoring-model.md). Examples:
M16.author.missing_person_schema— an editorial page with a byline but noPersonschema (fail, severity 3,fixable: auto, confidenceestablished— the markup requirement is documented; the ranking effect is not, and belongs inrationaleasdirectional).M16.author.no_bio_page— the byline does not link to an author/bio page (warn, severity 3,fixable: proposed, confidencedirectional).M16.org.no_contact_page— no discoverable About/Contact and nocontactPoint(warn, severity 3,fixable: advisory, confidencedirectional).M16.transparency.no_disclosure— affiliate, sponsored, or AI-assisted content with no visible disclosure (warn, severity 3,fixable: advisory, confidencedirectional). Each finding:evidence.observedquotes what is on the page;verification.reproduceis the runnable command above;expected_impactis banded + confidence-tagged (no naked %).
Honesty
- E-E-A-T is not a score Google exposes, and Google's own framing is "people-first content". Its guidance asks who, how, and why: is there a real author with real experience, was the content made for readers rather than for engines. Everything this module measures is a visible proxy for that judgment, so every finding here is
directional— adding aPersonblock or an author bio is not a ranking lever, and must never be presented as one. - Trust is the foundational element and now applies well beyond YMYL, but a page does not become trustworthy by acquiring markup. Report missing signals as "a reader (or an AI system) cannot tell who stands behind this", not as points lost.
- A fabricated author, an invented credential, or fake review markup is worse than nothing — it is a trust risk in Search and in AI answers alike. The tool only emits trust signals the user can substantiate, and leaves a clearly-marked
TODOwhere it cannot.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

