score
Skill81 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Recompute and display the two scores (Search SEO + AI Visibility) from a persisted audit run, without re-crawling. Use to re-show or refresh the scores after an audit, to score a specific run directory or host, or to score a saved findings JSON file.
15 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- akachandan1/video-studiotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Hainrixz/claude-dbtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- maroffo/claude-forgetheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- askoulwassim/perfect-placementtheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- gagoar/icebergtheir own version, first seen Oct 10, 2026
- quantumaikr/quant.cpptheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions15 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 15
- quantumaikr/quant.cpp★ 403same name
- Hainrixz/claude-db★ 22same name
- maroffo/claude-forge★ 17same name
- gagoar/iceberg★ 10same name
- askoulwassim/perfect-placement★ 3same name
- stonegiantstudio/skills★ 3same name
- akachandan1/video-studio★ 2same name
- dcolclazier/skills★ 1same name
- santiment/skills★ 1same name
- automatewithuday/GTM-Public-Traded-AI-Accounts★ 0same name
5 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository33 other files it gives its agents.
- auditSkill
- compareSkill
- fixSkill
- geoSkill
- seo-agent-readinessSkill
- seo-ai-crawlersSkill
- seo-ai-discoverySkill
- seo-core-web-vitalsSkill
- seo-crawlabilitySkill
- seo-crawl-renderSkill
- seo-ecommerceSkill
- seo-eeatSkill
- seo-entity-linkingSkill
- seo-fix-applySkill
- seo-freshnessSkill
- seo-geo-answerblocksSkill
- seo-geo-factdensitySkill
- seo-headings-structureSkill
- seo-images-mediaSkill
- seo-indexabilitySkill
- seo-internal-linkingSkill
- seo-internationalSkill
- seo-localSkill
- seo-meta-onpageSkill
- seo-mobileSkill
- seo-orchestratorSkill
- seo-platform-detectSkill
- seo-renderingSkill
- seo-schema-jsonldSkill
- seo-scoreSkill
- seo-sitemapsSkill
- seo-social-cardsSkill
- seo-vertical-detectSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
No argument (default): read <root>/index.json, take the host whose latest run id sorts highest (run ids are UTC YYYY-MM-DDTHH-mm-ssZ, so …
- Very specific: line 19
If no index.json/latest.json exists, or the run has no findings.json, tell the user to run /claude-seo-ai:audit <url> first — never score …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- Portions Copyright (c) 2026 Enrique Rocha (@soyenriquerocha) - see LICENSE for original authors · tododeia.com · id er-d03758e1 -->/claude-seo-ai:score
Recompute and show the two 0–100 scores by running the seo-score skill, which uses scripts/score.mjs for a reproducible number.
Runs live under <root>/<host>/<run-id>/, where <root> is --out › $CLAUDE_SEO_AI_HOME › ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}/runs › ~/.claude-seo-ai/runs, and <host> is the lower-cased host with : → _ (local targets become local/<basename>-<hash>). score.mjs --run takes a directory or a findings file — it does not understand the word latest, so resolve the pointer yourself with Read before you call it: <root>/<host>/latest.json is { run, path, updated_at } and path is the absolute run directory; <root>/index.json lists every host with its latest run id.
- No argument (default): read
<root>/index.json, take the host whoselatestrun id sorts highest (run ids are UTCYYYY-MM-DDTHH-mm-ssZ, so string order is chronological), read that host'slatest.json, thennode "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/score.mjs" --run <path from latest.json>. latest:<host>→ read<root>/<host>/latest.jsonand pass itspathto--run.- A run directory →
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/score.mjs" --run <run-dir>(it reads<run-dir>/findings.json). - A findings JSON path →
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/score.mjs" --findings <path>(add--vertical a,b,--multilingualand--environment production|preview|staging|localwhen the file carries no run context;--manifest <crawl.json>adds the site rollup,--strictexits 2 if any finding fails schema validation,--validate-onlyreports the per-finding schema verdict without scoring). - If no
index.json/latest.jsonexists, or the run has nofindings.json, tell the user to run/claude-seo-ai:audit <url>first — never score from memory.
Show both scores with bands, the per-category breakdown, any severity-gating cap (cap_reasons), the unscored state when no category is active, and the needs_api / manual_review / dropped counts. Two scores, never blended. When an axis comes back provisional: true (state: "partial"), say the band and its coverage % in the same sentence — a band built on a third of the model is not the same claim as a measured one, and the per-axis warnings[] name what was not measured. With a rollup, read pages_scored against pages_count: a page listed in unscored_pages[] did not answer 2xx, so it was never scored — name those pages and their status instead of letting the site score stand for a sample that was not measured.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

