agentleFS
HainrixzHainrixz/claude-seo-ai/skills/seo-core-web-vitals/SKILL.md

seo-core-web-vitals

Skill81 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Audit Core Web Vitals & page performance — measure LCP, INP, and CLS against p75 field thresholds, diagnose render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and layout-shift sources, and produce prioritized, advisory-only remediation guidance. Module M15. Feeds the Search SEO score (heavily) and the AI Visibility score (minimally).

  • Reads credentials

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    When the required data tier is unavailable, status is needs_api — never a false pass.

    line 29

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- Portions Copyright (c) 2026 Enrique Rocha (@soyenriquerocha) - see LICENSE for original authors · tododeia.com · id er-d03758e1 -->

seo-core-web-vitals (M15)

Core Web Vitals are a confirmed Google ranking signal and a proxy for page quality. Thresholds, field-vs-lab honesty rules, and LCP decomposition: references/cwv-thresholds.md (follow it exactly).

Inputs

Work from the PageSnapshot named in your dispatch envelope: read parsed from <run_dir>/pages/<slug>.json (scripts[], stylesheets[], images[]) plus timing.ttfb_ms, body.bytes, and render — field data still needs the PSI tier; Grep pages/<slug>.html for verbatim evidence; site artifacts live in <run_dir>/site/{robots.json,sitemaps.json,discovery.json}. Deterministic findings already emitted by audit.mjs are listed in <run_dir>/findings.deterministic.json — do not re-emit those ids; add model-judged findings only. If invoked directly with a URL/path and no snapshot exists, first run node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/snapshot.mjs" <target> --out "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}/runs" and use the printed snapshot path.

Audits

Working from the PageSnapshot (parsed_rendered when render.used is not none, else parsed):

  1. Field CWV at p75 — LCP ≤ 2.5 s, INP ≤ 200 ms (INP replaced FID), CLS ≤ 0.1, all at the 75th percentile of real-user data. All three must pass for a "good" rating. Use the proactive-warning thresholds (LCP > 2.0 s, INP > 160 ms, CLS > 0.08) to warn before failing.
  2. Render-blocking resources — synchronous <script> in <head> (no defer/async/type=module), blocking <link rel="stylesheet">, and @import chains that delay first render (LCP/INP risk).
  3. Unoptimized images — missing width/height (or aspect-ratio), no loading="lazy" below the fold, no responsive srcset/sizes, legacy formats where AVIF/WebP would serve, and a non-preloaded LCP image.
  4. Layout-shift sources — images/iframes/ads/embeds without reserved dimensions, web-font swap without font-display/size-adjust, and content injected above existing content (CLS risk).
  5. LCP decomposition — attribute LCP to TTFB vs resource load delay vs load duration vs render delay (see references/cwv-thresholds.md) so each finding targets the dominant subpart.

Fixes (fixable: advisory)

Advisory only. Performance fixes touch build config, server, CDN, and runtime JavaScript — high breakage risk — so the tool diagnoses and prioritizes but never auto-edits performance code. For each failing metric, name the specific resource/element causing it and rank fixes by expected leverage (e.g. preload the LCP image, defer non-critical JS, reserve image dimensions). Give framework-specific direction where the stack is known. Never fabricate measured values — if field data is absent, ask the user to supply a PSI/CrUX key or leave a clearly-marked TODO placeholder rather than guessing a metric.

Verification

  • Field (Tier 1): node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/psi-client.mjs" --url <final_url> [--strategy mobile|desktop] [--timeout 60000] calls the PageSpeed Insights API (loadingExperience, method psi_api). It takes a URL only — there is no --snapshot mode, because field data is measured on the live origin, not on a saved DOM. The key comes from the environment (CLAUDE_PLUGIN_OPTION_PSI_API_KEY, else PSI_API_KEY); there is deliberately no --key flag. Without a key the script returns status: "needs_api" at exit 0 — branch on status, never on the exit code. When PSI sets origin_fallback, the numbers are origin-level and the finding must say so. CrUX History (crux_api) is not implemented by the bundled client (references/cwv-thresholds.md): never claim a p75 trend from this tool.
  • Tier 0 (no key): emit status: needs_api for every field-CWV finding, plus clearly-labeled lab heuristics (render-blocking count, missing image dimensions, bundle weight). Label lab signals "lab data — not what Google ranks on"; never present a heuristic as a measured field value.
  • When the required data tier is unavailable, status is needs_api — never a false pass.

Findings

Emit findings per schema/finding.schema.json. Severity policy: 5 is reserved for catastrophic, eligibility-killing facts at site/template scope; 4 major · 3 moderate · 2 minor · 1 cosmetic · 0 informational — and only an established severity-5 fail in an active category can cap a score (references/scoring-model.md). Field CWV never reaches 5: it is a tie-breaker, not an eligibility gate. Examples:

  • M15.lcp.exceeds_p75 — field LCP > 2.5 s at p75 (status fail, severity 4, fixable: advisory, axis search, confidence established). evidence.observed quotes the measured p75 value and the LCP element; verification.reproduce runs the psi-client command.
  • M15.cls.unsized_image — image with no width/height shifting layout (status warn, severity 4, fixable: advisory, axis search, confidence directional). evidence.observed quotes the <img> tag.
  • M15.field.needs_api — no PSI/CrUX key, field CWV unverifiable (status needs_api, severity 4, fixable: advisory, axis search, confidence established). Each finding: evidence.observed quotes the page/measurement; verification.reproduce is the runnable command; expected_impact is banded + confidence-tagged (no naked %).

Honesty

  • Lab ≠ field. A single local Lighthouse run is diagnostic only; Google ranks on field (CrUX) p75. Never let a lab number drive the Search score or masquerade as a field result.
  • CWV is a real but modest tie-breaker signal — it does not override relevance/content quality. Don't promise ranking jumps from a green score; report it as banded expected_impact, not a predicted percentage gain.
  • A "100" lab performance score is not a pass if field p75 fails; only field data settles a CWV finding.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.