seo-core-web-vitals
Skill81 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Audit Core Web Vitals & page performance — measure LCP, INP, and CLS against p75 field thresholds, diagnose render-blocking resources, unoptimized images, and layout-shift sources, and produce prioritized, advisory-only remediation guidance. Module M15. Feeds the Search SEO score (heavily) and the AI Visibility score (minimally).
- Reads credentials
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- charanjit-singh/lovable-skillstheir own version, first seen May 22, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- charanjit-singh/lovable-skills★ 10same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository33 other files it gives its agents.
- auditSkill
- compareSkill
- fixSkill
- geoSkill
- scoreSkill
- seo-agent-readinessSkill
- seo-ai-crawlersSkill
- seo-ai-discoverySkill
- seo-crawlabilitySkill
- seo-crawl-renderSkill
- seo-ecommerceSkill
- seo-eeatSkill
- seo-entity-linkingSkill
- seo-fix-applySkill
- seo-freshnessSkill
- seo-geo-answerblocksSkill
- seo-geo-factdensitySkill
- seo-headings-structureSkill
- seo-images-mediaSkill
- seo-indexabilitySkill
- seo-internal-linkingSkill
- seo-internationalSkill
- seo-localSkill
- seo-meta-onpageSkill
- seo-mobileSkill
- seo-orchestratorSkill
- seo-platform-detectSkill
- seo-renderingSkill
- seo-schema-jsonldSkill
- seo-scoreSkill
- seo-sitemapsSkill
- seo-social-cardsSkill
- seo-vertical-detectSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 29
When the required data tier is unavailable, status is needs_api — never a false pass.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- Portions Copyright (c) 2026 Enrique Rocha (@soyenriquerocha) - see LICENSE for original authors · tododeia.com · id er-d03758e1 -->seo-core-web-vitals (M15)
Core Web Vitals are a confirmed Google ranking signal and a proxy for page quality. Thresholds, field-vs-lab honesty rules, and LCP decomposition: references/cwv-thresholds.md (follow it exactly).
Inputs
Work from the PageSnapshot named in your dispatch envelope: read parsed from <run_dir>/pages/<slug>.json (scripts[], stylesheets[], images[]) plus timing.ttfb_ms, body.bytes, and render — field data still needs the PSI tier; Grep pages/<slug>.html for verbatim evidence; site artifacts live in <run_dir>/site/{robots.json,sitemaps.json,discovery.json}. Deterministic findings already emitted by audit.mjs are listed in <run_dir>/findings.deterministic.json — do not re-emit those ids; add model-judged findings only. If invoked directly with a URL/path and no snapshot exists, first run node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/snapshot.mjs" <target> --out "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_DATA}/runs" and use the printed snapshot path.
Audits
Working from the PageSnapshot (parsed_rendered when render.used is not none, else parsed):
- Field CWV at p75 — LCP ≤ 2.5 s, INP ≤ 200 ms (INP replaced FID), CLS ≤ 0.1, all at the 75th percentile of real-user data. All three must pass for a "good" rating. Use the proactive-warning thresholds (LCP > 2.0 s, INP > 160 ms, CLS > 0.08) to
warnbefore failing. - Render-blocking resources — synchronous
<script>in<head>(nodefer/async/type=module), blocking<link rel="stylesheet">, and@importchains that delay first render (LCP/INP risk). - Unoptimized images — missing
width/height(oraspect-ratio), noloading="lazy"below the fold, no responsivesrcset/sizes, legacy formats where AVIF/WebP would serve, and a non-preloaded LCP image. - Layout-shift sources — images/iframes/ads/embeds without reserved dimensions, web-font swap without
font-display/size-adjust, and content injected above existing content (CLS risk). - LCP decomposition — attribute LCP to TTFB vs resource load delay vs load duration vs render delay (see
references/cwv-thresholds.md) so each finding targets the dominant subpart.
Fixes (fixable: advisory)
Advisory only. Performance fixes touch build config, server, CDN, and runtime JavaScript — high breakage risk — so the tool diagnoses and prioritizes but never auto-edits performance code. For each failing metric, name the specific resource/element causing it and rank fixes by expected leverage (e.g. preload the LCP image, defer non-critical JS, reserve image dimensions). Give framework-specific direction where the stack is known. Never fabricate measured values — if field data is absent, ask the user to supply a PSI/CrUX key or leave a clearly-marked TODO placeholder rather than guessing a metric.
Verification
- Field (Tier 1):
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/psi-client.mjs" --url <final_url> [--strategy mobile|desktop] [--timeout 60000]calls the PageSpeed Insights API (loadingExperience, methodpsi_api). It takes a URL only — there is no--snapshotmode, because field data is measured on the live origin, not on a saved DOM. The key comes from the environment (CLAUDE_PLUGIN_OPTION_PSI_API_KEY, elsePSI_API_KEY); there is deliberately no--keyflag. Without a key the script returnsstatus: "needs_api"at exit 0 — branch onstatus, never on the exit code. When PSI setsorigin_fallback, the numbers are origin-level and the finding must say so. CrUX History (crux_api) is not implemented by the bundled client (references/cwv-thresholds.md): never claim a p75 trend from this tool. - Tier 0 (no key): emit
status: needs_apifor every field-CWV finding, plus clearly-labeled lab heuristics (render-blocking count, missing image dimensions, bundle weight). Label lab signals "lab data — not what Google ranks on"; never present a heuristic as a measured field value. - When the required data tier is unavailable, status is
needs_api— never a falsepass.
Findings
Emit findings per schema/finding.schema.json. Severity policy: 5 is reserved for catastrophic, eligibility-killing facts at site/template scope; 4 major · 3 moderate · 2 minor · 1 cosmetic · 0 informational — and only an established severity-5 fail in an active category can cap a score (references/scoring-model.md). Field CWV never reaches 5: it is a tie-breaker, not an eligibility gate. Examples:
M15.lcp.exceeds_p75— field LCP > 2.5 s at p75 (statusfail, severity 4,fixable: advisory, axissearch, confidenceestablished).evidence.observedquotes the measured p75 value and the LCP element;verification.reproduceruns the psi-client command.M15.cls.unsized_image— image with nowidth/heightshifting layout (statuswarn, severity 4,fixable: advisory, axissearch, confidencedirectional).evidence.observedquotes the<img>tag.M15.field.needs_api— no PSI/CrUX key, field CWV unverifiable (statusneeds_api, severity 4,fixable: advisory, axissearch, confidenceestablished). Each finding:evidence.observedquotes the page/measurement;verification.reproduceis the runnable command;expected_impactis banded + confidence-tagged (no naked %).
Honesty
- Lab ≠ field. A single local Lighthouse run is diagnostic only; Google ranks on field (CrUX) p75. Never let a lab number drive the Search score or masquerade as a field result.
- CWV is a real but modest tie-breaker signal — it does not override relevance/content quality. Don't promise ranking jumps from a green score; report it as banded
expected_impact, not a predicted percentage gain. - A "100" lab performance score is not a pass if field p75 fails; only field data settles a CWV finding.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

