review-security
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Review code changes with Security Review subagent.
22 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- amirbena/code-review-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codechup/claude-code-labtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- yuri-xyz/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- unlockers-ai/unlockers-skills-librarytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- 0xdeafcafe/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- nesnilnehc/ai-cortextheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use origin and review-perf.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
0mlkrizzz655335vSkillorigin
origin CLI 管理。安装、登录、更新、修复 origin.cursor.com 的 CLI。"disabled-environments:
Also in 3 projects that use this
nielsmadanSkillreview-perf
Performance analysis for algorithmic complexity, memory leaks, N+1 queries, and render issues. Use when code feels slow, after adding loops/queries, or before scaling up.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions22 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- whyymj/page-agent-sdk★ 1100% same
- marslo/skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 1
- JameMy0001/antigravity-skills-hub★ 184% same
Wrote their own version · 19
- pydantic/monty★ 8.9ksame name
- OpenAEV-Platform/openaev★ 1.8ksame name
- gtrabanco/agentic-workflow★ 23same name
- Phelan164/codex-howto★ 15same name
- amirbena/code-review-skill★ 8same name
- borkweb/skills★ 8same name
- kauffj/agent-config★ 8same name
- mgiovani/cc-arsenal★ 8same name
- nesnilnehc/ai-cortex★ 8same name
- paultyng/skill-issue★ 8same name
9 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository25 other files it gives its agents.
- automateSkill
- autopilotSkill
- canvasSkill
- complex-problem-solvingSkill
- cost-estimateSkill
- create-hookSkill
- create-ruleSkill
- create-skillSkill
- create-subagentSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- large-figma-featureSkill
- loopSkill
- migrate-to-skillsSkill
- onboardSkill
- rename-chatSkill
- review-bugbotSkill
- reviewSkill
- sdkSkill
- shellSkill
- split-to-prsSkill
- statuslineSkill
- update-cli-configSkill
- update-cursor-settingsSkill
- xcost-estimateSkill
- youspeak-aws-powerSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 7
Use this skill when the user asks to run /review-security.
- Distinctive: line 22
Check whether the target branch is already the currently checked out local branch.
- Distinctive: line 23
If a different branch is currently checked out, try to switch to the target branch.
- Distinctive: line 24
If Git refuses to switch because local files would be overwritten, conflicts need resolution, or another checkout blocker occurs, explain …
- Distinctive: line 25
Only stash after the user confirms.
- Distinctive: line 28
Use this exact prompt shape:
- Very specific: line 37
Default to branch changes, which reviews branch changes against the merge-base with the default/base branch, including committed, staged, …
- Distinctive: line 39
If the review subagent fails before producing findings, inspect the failure text.
- Very specific: line 41
If the failure is caused by calling the subagent incorrectly, such as a missing Full Repository Path, missing Diff, wrong prompt shape, or …
- Distinctive: line 43
If the same failure persists after the retry, stop.
- Distinctive: line 45
After the subagent finishes, summarize the result:
- Distinctive: line 47
If it reports that no diff was found or the diff is empty, tell the user in one sentence that there was no diff to review.
- Distinctive: line 48
If it found no issues, give a one-line status such as "Security review found 2 findings / Security review found no issues".
- Very specific: line 49
If it found issues, print a compact markdown table with one row per finding, sorted by severity (highest first), using exactly these …
- Distinctive: line 51
Do not fix findings or rerun review unless the user explicitly asks for that next step.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Review Security
Use this skill when the user asks to run /review-security.
Launch exactly one security-review subagent with:
run_in_background: falseunless explicitly asked to run in backgrounddescription: "Security Review"subagent_type: "security-review"
The review subagent computes the local diff from the repository path, so do not compute the diff yourself before launching it. The repository path should be the active workspace or repository root for the code the user wants reviewed.
By default, the review subagent infers the repository's actual base branch, such as main, when computing branch changes. In most cases, do not provide Base Branch. Only provide it if you know the current branch or PR should be compared against a specific branch other than the repository's default base branch, such as when you created the current branch from another branch.
Special case: if the user explicitly asks to review a specific PR or branch, make sure that target is checked out before launching the subagent:
- Examples include
github.com/... /review,review {link}, orreview {branch-name}. - Resolve the provided PR link, PR number, or branch name to the PR head branch or named branch.
- Check whether the target branch is already the currently checked out local branch. If it is, continue.
- If a different branch is currently checked out, try to switch to the target branch.
- If Git refuses to switch because local files would be overwritten, conflicts need resolution, or another checkout blocker occurs, explain the blocker and ask whether the user wants to stash local changes before retrying.
- Only stash after the user confirms. If the stash succeeds, retry switching to the target branch.
- Launch the review subagent only after the target branch is checked out locally.
Use this exact prompt shape:
Full Repository Path: <absolute repository path>
Diff: <one of: "branch changes", "uncommitted changes">
Base Branch: <only include this line when reviewing branch changes against a known specific base branch>
Custom Instructions: <only include this line when the user gave specific review instructions>Default to branch changes, which reviews branch changes against the merge-base with the default/base branch, including committed, staged, and unstaged changes. If the user asks to review only uncommitted, local working tree, dirty, or not-yet-committed changes, use uncommitted changes.
If the review subagent fails before producing findings, inspect the failure text.
- If the failure is caused by calling the subagent incorrectly, such as a missing
Full Repository Path, missingDiff, wrong prompt shape, or wrong subagent type, correct the invocation and retry it once immediately. - For any other subagent failure, retry once with the same prompt shape.
- If the same failure persists after the retry, stop. Briefly tell the user that the review subagent could not complete and include the short error or blocker. Do not keep retrying.
After the subagent finishes, summarize the result:
- If it reports that no diff was found or the diff is empty, tell the user in one sentence that there was no diff to review.
- If it found no issues, give a one-line status such as "Security review found 2 findings / Security review found no issues".
- If it found issues, print a compact markdown table with one row per finding, sorted by severity (highest first), using exactly these columns: Severity, Location (file:line), Finding. Put the file and line in the location column as
file:line.
Do not fix findings or rerun review unless the user explicitly asks for that next step.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

