wizard
Skill73 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Generate an interactive bash wizard that walks a human through steps only they can perform. Use when provisioning infrastructure, setting up credentials or CI secrets, walking an unfamiliar third-party dashboard, or running a one-off migration or cutover. Don't invoke this for steps the agent can perform itself, nor when the procedure has fewer than 4 human steps and no values to persist — list those steps in chat instead.
- Reads credentials
170 other projects use a version of this, 144 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- SantiagoVqz/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudeedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- The-Vibe-Company/quivredited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- 5thlayer/skillworksedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dfirmin/compassedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, writing-beats and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 42 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 56 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 49 projects that use this
ryotaroh180105Skillclaude-handoff
Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.
Also in 41 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-shape
Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.
Also in 54 projects that use this
simo97Skillmigrate-to-shoehorn
Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace `as` in tests, or needs partial test data.
Also in 47 projects that use this
- +1 more from Lesani
Other versions170 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 144
- mattpocock/skills★ 309k99% same
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40k99% same
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40k99% same
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3k99% same
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9k99% same
- bestofjs/bestofjs★ 3.1k99% same
- CelestoAI/SmolVM★ 1.2k99% same
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 66799% same
- nodetool-ai/nodetool★ 61583% same
- aws/graph-explorer★ 49099% same
134 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 26
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- devcxl/mattpocock-skills-zh★ 522same name
- vlad-ko/claude-wizard★ 71same name
- WenWuZhiDao/mattpocock-skills-zh★ 27same name
- Nenyax-AI/Nenyax★ 9same name
- ek33450505/claude-agent-team★ 8same name
- imMamdouhaboammar/matts-skills-into-chatgpt★ 8same name
- Boom-Vitt/skills-thai★ 5same name
- KroxiDev/engineering-skills★ 4same name
- malinskibeniamin/skills★ 4same name
16 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- folder-level/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- absorb-packSkill
- agent-authoringSkill
- agent-dispatchSkill
- align-intentSkill
- auto-choiceSkill
- brainstormSkill
- cavemanSkill
- check-my-stackSkill
- debuggingSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- e2e-contractSkill
- e2e-explore-then-batchSkill
- e2e-routeSkill
- figma-context-budgetSkill
- find-skillsSkill
- gate-authoringSkill
- github-repo-researchSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoff-implSkill
- implementSkill
- model-onboardSkill
- mutation-testingSkill
- prototypeSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- research-before-answerSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- review-implementSkill
- review-methodSkill
- review-zhSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- strategic-compactSkill
- tddSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- workflow-hardeningSkill
- write-pr-descriptionSkill
- zoom-outSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 1 is common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
1
Common
Most of the 154 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 34
Done when: every stage traces to concrete instructions a stranger could follow.
- Very specific: line 46
Don't run it end-to-end yourself — it opens browsers and blocks on human input.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 154 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Wizard
A wizard is a bash script that walks a human, step by step, through a manual procedure that's tedious to do by hand and tedious to re-explain to an AI every time. It opens each URL, says exactly what to click and copy, captures the values, writes them where they belong (.env, GitHub secrets), confirms at every stage, and shows how many stages are left. It might configure third-party services, run a one-off migration, or move the project from one state to another.
The delightful UX is already solved by template.sh — stage-by-stage progress, confirmation gates, cross-platform URL opening (including WSL), hidden secret entry, idempotent .env upserts, gh secret/gh variable writes, and a closing summary. Your job is only to scope the procedure and author its stages. The library above the STAGES marker is identical in every wizard; that consistency is the point — never hand-edit it.
A wizard is ephemeral by default — built for one run, saved to a scratch or scripts/ path, deleted when the job's done. Commit it only when the user wants a repeatable setup path that should live in the repo.
Process
1. Scope the procedure
Work out every manual step the human must take and every value that gets captured along the way. Read the repo first — don't ask cold:
- For setup:
.env,.env.example,.env.*,README,docker-compose*, framework config, and.github/workflows/*(everysecrets.*/vars.*reference is a value the wizard must produce). - For a migration or transition: the current state, the target state, and the irreversible actions between them.
Then show the user the ordered list of stages and the values each produces, and confirm — they may add, drop, or reorder.
Done when: every stage is named in order, and for each captured value you know (a) where the human gets it, (b) where it's written (.env, a GitHub secret, both, or nowhere — some stages are pure actions), and (c) whether it's secret (hidden entry) or public.
2. Map each stage's journey
For each stage, write the precise path a human follows: which URL to open, what to do there, where a value is shown, which variable it fills — e.g. "Dashboard → Developers → API keys → Reveal test key → copy". Where you don't actually know the current UI or the exact command, say so and ask the user or check the docs — never invent steps that may not exist.
Done when: every stage traces to concrete instructions a stranger could follow.
3. Author the wizard
Copy template.sh to the target path. Replace the example stage with one stage per step, in dependency order. Use the library helpers — stage, say/step, open_url, ask/ask_secret, write_env, set_secret/set_var, pause/confirm — and set TOTAL_STAGES to the number of stages you wrote.
Hold the bar the template sets: open the URL before asking for its value, use ask_secret for anything secret, write_env every persisted value, set_secret only the values CI actually needs, and confirm before any irreversible action. Each stage clears the screen so only the current step is visible — keep a stage to one focused task so nothing the human needs scrolls away. Don't touch the library above the marker.
4. Verify and hand off
bash -n <script>; runshellcheckif available.chmod +x <script>.- Don't run it end-to-end yourself — it opens browsers and blocks on human input. Trace it statically instead: every value from step 1 is captured and lands where step 1 said, and every
set_secretname exactly matches asecrets.*reference in CI. - Tell the user how to run it. If it's a repeatable setup path, commit it and link it from the README so the next person runs the script instead of asking an AI.
踩過的坑
- 2026-08-11 graft 上游
wizard-no-minutes(移除TOTAL_MINUTES/time-remaining 整套),四塊本地補丁零衝突。目前 pin 只看 frontmatterupstream-pinned,本節不記 hash。 - 2026-08-06 fork 自 mattpocock/skills v1.2.2(
8b36d4f)。本地 template.sh 對上游打了四個補丁(B 組實測抓洞、8/8 test pass):H1 無 TTY 直接 exit 64(防無人輸入時假成功寫空值);H2 write_env 含空格/#/引號的值加雙引號轉義、拒絕換行、_existing 反解引號保 round-trip;H3 首次寫.env前驗 gitignore、未忽略要 confirm 否則 exit 65;H4 set_secret/set_var 一律顯式--repo(WIZARD_GH_REPO可覆寫)+逐筆 confirm 帶 repo 與帳號名(雙帳號環境防推錯)。上游 template.sh 有更新時不可直接覆蓋、要 graft 保這四塊。 - 規模門檻(description 也有):少於 4 個人工步驟、或沒有值要落地 → 不生成,走 dispatch-and-verify 的文字清單出口。
- 註解界線:
STAGES標記線以上是 vendor 函式庫(上游明令 never hand-edit、註解原樣保留=「不寫註解」規則的 vendor 例外);線以下由 Claude 生成的 stages 照使用者規則不寫註解、不要照抄範例段的註解風格。 - 不加 Self-Verify 段:產出驗證已內建在流程 step 4(bash -n+靜態追蹤),再疊 subagent 對表是重複。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

