validation-supervision
Skill2 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub
Load when a ship starts or already has an active no-mistakes validation run, including a mid-run requirement change or finding, and before deciding or answering any ask-user finding.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data
Most recently taken up by
- kunchenguid/firstmateword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- kunchenguid/firstmate★ 8.7k100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- afkSkill
- agent-skill-trigger-indexSkill
- ahoySkill
- ask-user-authoritySkill
- away-quiet-supervisionSkill
- bearingsSkill
- bootstrap-diagnosticsSkill
- captain-hold-lifecycleSkill
- control-firstmateSkill
- decision-hold-lifecycleSkill
- diagnostic-reasoningSkill
- firstmate-codexappSkill
- firstmate-coding-guidelinesSkill
- firstmate-orcaSkill
- fmx-respondSkill
- harness-adaptersSkill
- operational-home-layoutSkill
- process-event-sourcesSkill
- project-managementSkill
- quietSkill
- quota-array-dispatchSkill
- scout-completionSkill
- secondmate-provisioningSkill
- session-start-recoverySkill
- ship-landingSkill
- stowSkill
- stuck-crewmate-recoverySkill
- updatefirstmateSkill
- verify-firstmateSkill
- stowSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Only a current, explicit captain instruction that completely invalidates the work being validated keeps the task with the same worker …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Validation supervision
For a no-mistakes ship, trigger validation on the same worker after its implementation commit, using the harness invocation owned by harness-adapters.
The task worker that starts a no-mistakes run drives the pipeline and owns every no-mistakes axi run and no-mistakes axi respond call through the next gate or outcome.
Firstmate never invokes no-mistakes axi respond for a crew-owned run.
bin/fm-dod-lib.sh owns the worker-side --intent contract.
Once validation starts, prefer routing new requirements to follow-up work rather than expanding the current task, unless a new requirement completely invalidates the work being validated; however, the smallest downstream changes needed to keep already accepted product or engineering behavior correct, add behavioral tests where an executable contract exists, or keep documentation accurate remain within the current task even when they touch files not named at intake, and corrections required to satisfy already accepted intent are not new requirements.
Only a current, explicit captain instruction that completely invalidates the work being validated keeps the task with the same worker instead of routing it to follow-up work or handing it to a replacement.
That worker cancels the active run through no-mistakes axi's supported abort command and confirms through axi status that the run has stopped before changing any code.
The worker then follows branch_sync.next_action from structured axi status: use axi sync's supported guarded recovery only when its code is recover_custody, and otherwise proceed only when structured status confirms that branch ownership is already returned and no recovery is required.
Custody recovery settles branch ownership, not content: the worker must replace the obsolete work from the correct pre-invalidation base rather than building on top of the recovered-but-obsolete head, keeping the obsolete run's own pipeline-fix commits out of what gets validated and shipped.
Apart from that single supported abort, do not hand-edit, commit, restart, or start a second validation run while the obsolete run still owns the branch.
Once ownership is settled, validate exactly once against that final head so no obsolete or intermediate head is ever treated as authoritative.
An ask-user finding returns as needs-decision; firstmate loads ask-user-authority and either decides or escalates per that skill.
Send the same worker one exact decision naming the decision key, step, action, affected finding IDs, instructions where needed, and exact response command, passing --resolve-key so the worker's open decision record closes at answer time.
Require the matching resolved event, forbid --yes, and require the worker to process every synchronous return until completion or a genuinely new escalation.
Resume fleet supervision immediately after the decision lands.
Judge validation by the resolved state line from bin/fm-crew-state.sh, whose header owns outcome mappings and CI-monitor/daemon exceptions, never by shell liveness, the last status event, or a raw run record.
Workers parked at approval or fix-review must follow the active gate help.
A worker hand-editing, committing, aborting, or restarting during an active validation run duplicates pipeline ownership outside the supersession sequence above; steer it back to the gate response flow.
The worker reports the PR when CI first becomes green rather than waiting for merge monitoring to finish.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

