asc-metrics
Skill2.2k starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
When the user wants to analyze their own app's actual performance data from App Store Connect — real downloads, revenue, IAP, subscriptions, trials, or country breakdowns synced via Appeeky Connect. Use when the user asks about "my downloads", "my revenue", "how is my app performing", "ASC data", "sales and trends", "my subscription numbers", "App Store Connect metrics", or wants to compare periods or top markets. For third-party app estimates, see app-analytics. For subscription analytics depth, see monetization-strategy.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Trending
Quiet since March.thin dataabout the whole repository
Most recently taken up by
- appeeky/aso-skillsword for word, first seen Feb 27, 2026
Who's talking about Eronred/aso-skills
The biggest 1 of 1 mention linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- appeeky/aso-skills★ 2.2k100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository41 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ab-test-store-listingSkill
- android-asoSkill
- app-analyticsSkill
- app-clipsSkill
- app-icon-optimizationSkill
- app-launchSkill
- apple-search-adsSkill
- app-marketing-contextSkill
- app-preview-videoSkill
- app-rejection-recoverySkill
- app-store-featuredSkill
- aso-auditSkill
- aso-routerSkill
- attribution-setupSkill
- category-positioningSkill
- competitor-analysisSkill
- competitor-trackingSkill
- crash-analyticsSkill
- creator-ugc-marketingSkill
- custom-product-pagesSkill
- in-app-eventsSkill
- keyword-researchSkill
- localizationSkill
- market-moversSkill
- market-pulseSkill
- metadata-optimizationSkill
- monetization-strategySkill
- onboarding-optimizationSkill
- paywall-optimizationSkill
- press-and-prSkill
- rating-prompt-strategySkill
- referral-programSkill
- retention-optimizationSkill
- review-managementSkill
- screenshot-optimizationSkill
- seasonal-asoSkill
- subscription-lifecycleSkill
- ua-campaignSkill
- web-to-app-funnelSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
If ASC is not connected, prompt the user to connect it at appeeky.com/settings and return.
- Very specific: line 22
Check for app-marketing-context.md — read it for app context
- Distinctive: line 23
Ask: What do you want to analyze?
- Distinctive: line 24
Ask: Which time period? (default: last 30 days)
- Distinctive: line 25
Ask: Specific app or all apps?
- Distinctive: line 129
When a significant change (>20%) is detected, flag it:
- Distinctive: line 141
Check if an update shipped on that date
- Very specific: line 142
Check keyword rankings (use keyword-research skill)
- Very specific: line 143
Check competitor activity (use competitor-analysis skill)
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ASC Metrics
You analyze the user's official App Store Connect data synced into Appeeky — exact downloads, revenue, IAP, subscriptions, and trials. This is first-party data, not estimates.
Prerequisites
- Appeeky account with ASC connected (Settings → Integrations → App Store Connect)
- Indie plan or higher (2 credits per request)
- Data syncs nightly; up to 90 days of history available
If ASC is not connected, prompt the user to connect it at appeeky.com/settings and return.
Initial Assessment
- Check for
app-marketing-context.md— read it for app context - Ask: What do you want to analyze? (downloads, revenue, subscriptions, country breakdown, trend comparison)
- Ask: Which time period? (default: last 30 days)
- Ask: Specific app or all apps?
Fetching Data
Step 1 — List available apps
GET /v1/connect/metrics/appsMatch the user's app to an app_apple_id if not already known.
Step 2 — Get overview (portfolio)
GET /v1/connect/metrics?from=YYYY-MM-DD&to=YYYY-MM-DDStep 3 — Get app detail (single app)
GET /v1/connect/metrics/apps/:appId?from=YYYY-MM-DD&to=YYYY-MM-DDResponse includes: daily[], countries[], totals.
See full API reference: appeeky-connect.md
Analysis Frameworks
Period-over-Period Comparison
Fetch two equal-length windows and compare:
| Metric | Prior Period | Current Period | Change |
| Downloads | [N] | [N] | [+/-X%] |
| Revenue | $[N] | $[N] | [+/-X%] |
| Subscriptions | [N] | [N] | [+/-X%] |
| Trials | [N] | [N] | [+/-X%] |
| Trial → Sub Rate | [X]% | [X]% | [+/-X pp] |
What to look for:
- Downloads rising but revenue flat → pricing or paywall issue
- Trials rising but conversions flat → paywall or onboarding issue
- Revenue rising but downloads flat → good monetization improvement
Daily Trend Analysis
From daily[], identify:
- Spikes — Did a feature, update, or press trigger them?
- Drops — Correlate with app updates, seasonality, or algorithm changes
- Trend direction — 7-day moving average vs prior 7 days
Country Breakdown
Sort countries[] by downloads and revenue:
- Top 5 by downloads — Are you investing in ASO for these markets?
- Top 5 by revenue — Higher ARPD (avg revenue per download) = prioritize ASO
- High downloads, low revenue — Markets with weak monetization
- Low downloads, high revenue — Under-tapped premium markets (localize)
Revenue Quality Check
Compute from the data:
| Metric | Formula | Benchmark |
| ARPD | Revenue / Downloads | > $0.05 good; > $0.20 excellent |
| Trial rate | Trials / Downloads | > 20% means strong paywall reach |
| Sub conversion | Subscriptions / Trials | > 25% is strong |
| Revenue per sub | Revenue / Subscriptions | Depends on pricing |
Output Format
Performance Snapshot
📊 [App Name] — [Period]
Downloads: [N] ([+/-X%] vs prior period)
Revenue: $[N] ([+/-X%])
Subscriptions: [N] ([+/-X%])
Trials: [N] ([+/-X%])
IAP Count: [N] ([+/-X%])
Trial→Sub: [X]%
Top Markets (downloads):
1. [Country] — [N] downloads, $[N]
2. [Country] — [N] downloads, $[N]
3. [Country] — [N] downloads, $[N]
Key Observations:
- [What the trend means]
- [Any anomaly and likely cause]
- [Opportunity identified]
Recommended Actions:
1. [Specific action based on data]
2. [Specific action based on data]Trend Alert
When a significant change (>20%) is detected, flag it:
⚠️ Downloads dropped [X]% this week
Possible causes: [list 2-3 hypotheses]
Next steps: [specific diagnostic actions]Common Questions
"Why did my downloads drop?"
- Pull daily trend — when did it start?
- Check if an update shipped on that date
- Check keyword rankings (use
keyword-researchskill) - Check competitor activity (use
competitor-analysisskill)
"Which countries should I localize for?"
Pull country breakdown → sort by downloads → flag high-download, non-English markets → use localization skill
"Is my monetization improving?"
Compare trial rate and trial→sub rate period over period → use monetization-strategy skill for paywall improvements
Related Skills
app-analytics— Full analytics stack setup and KPI frameworkmonetization-strategy— Improve subscription conversion and paywallretention-optimization— Reduce churn using the metrics as inputlocalization— Expand top-performing markets seen in country dataua-campaign— Validate whether paid installs show in downloads spike
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

