agentleFS
EarthOnlinePlayer5732EarthOnlinePlayer5732/my-skills/skills/upstream/monitor-experiment/SKILL.md

monitor-experiment

Skill17 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Monitor running experiments, check progress, collect results. Use when user says "check results", "is it done", "monitor", or wants experiment output.

6 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use experiment-audit, invention-structuring and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • PostHogSkill

    experiment-audit

    Audit a PostHog A/B experiment for a customer — verify config, exposure, attribution, and metrics. Trigger phrases include \"audit [customer]'s experiment\", \"audit the [name] experiment\", \"check experiment setup for [customer]\", \"validate this A/B test\", or any request to review whether an experiment is correctly wired up. Assumes you already have MCP access to the customer's project (typically via the impersonation flow set up by the `impersonate-audit` wrapper that ships with this plugin).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • raja21068Skill

    invention-structuring

    Structure a raw invention idea into a formal invention disclosure. Use when user says \"构建发明\", \"structure invention\", \"发明构建\", \"invention disclosure\", or wants to formalize a rough idea into a patent-ready structure.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • raja21068Skill

    jurisdiction-format

    Compile patent application into jurisdiction-specific filing format. Use when user says \"格式转换\", \"jurisdiction format\", \"国家格式\", \"compile patent\", or wants formatted patent documents for CN/US/EP filing.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +9 more from raja21068

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 4 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 4

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    If hardcopy fails, check for log files or tee output.

    line 53
  2. Common:

    If JSON results exist, fetch and parse them:

    line 60
  3. Very specific:

    After results are collected, check ~/.claude/feishu.json:

    line 130
  4. Very specific:

    If config absent or mode "off": skip entirely (no-op)

    line 132
  5. Common:

    Always show raw numbers before interpretation

    line 135
  6. Common:

    If results look wrong, check training logs for errors before concluding

    line 138
  7. Very specific:

    Vast.ai cost awareness: When monitoring vast.ai instances, report the running cost (hours * $/hr from vast-instances.json).

    line 139

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Monitor Experiment Results

⏱ External cadence is appropriate here. This skill waits on an external fact (job completion / progress), so it is a natural /loop / CronCreate surface: the wake reads status and self-judges only machine-checkable completion (exit code, file exists, epoch logged) — never quality. This is the additive external-wait shape in shared-references/external-cadence.md. If a scheduled wait here ends in a verdict step (e.g. then audit results), run that verdict once after the wait clears — not re-entered per tick.

Monitor: $ARGUMENTS

Workflow

Step 1: Check What's Running

SSH server:

ssh <server> "screen -ls"

Vast.ai instance (read ssh_host, ssh_port from vast-instances.json):

ssh -p <PORT> root@<HOST> "screen -ls"

Also check vast.ai instance status:

vastai show instances

Modal (when gpu: modal in CLAUDE.md):

modal app list         # List running/recent apps
modal app logs <app>   # Stream logs from a running app

Modal apps auto-terminate when done — if it's not in the list, it already finished. Check results via modal volume ls <volume> or local output.

Step 2: Collect Output from Each Screen

For each screen session, capture the last N lines:

ssh <server> "screen -S <name> -X hardcopy /tmp/screen_<name>.txt && tail -50 /tmp/screen_<name>.txt"

If hardcopy fails, check for log files or tee output.

Step 3: Check for JSON Result Files

ssh <server> "ls -lt <results_dir>/*.json 2>/dev/null | head -20"

If JSON results exist, fetch and parse them:

ssh <server> "cat <results_dir>/<latest>.json"

Step 3.5: Pull W&B Metrics (when wandb: true in CLAUDE.md)

Skip this step entirely if wandb is not set or is false in CLAUDE.md.

Pull training curves and metrics from Weights & Biases via Python API:

# List recent runs in the project
ssh <server> "python3 -c \"
import wandb
api = wandb.Api()
runs = api.runs('<entity>/<project>', per_page=10)
for r in runs:
    print(f'{r.id}  {r.state}  {r.name}  {r.summary.get(\"eval/loss\", \"N/A\")}')
\""

# Pull specific metrics from a run (last 50 steps)
ssh <server> "python3 -c \"
import wandb, json
api = wandb.Api()
run = api.run('<entity>/<project>/<run_id>')
history = list(run.scan_history(keys=['train/loss', 'eval/loss', 'eval/ppl', 'train/lr'], page_size=50))
print(json.dumps(history[-10:], indent=2))
\""

# Pull run summary (final metrics)
ssh <server> "python3 -c \"
import wandb, json
api = wandb.Api()
run = api.run('<entity>/<project>/<run_id>')
print(json.dumps(dict(run.summary), indent=2, default=str))
\""

What to extract:

  • Training loss curve — is it converging? diverging? plateauing?
  • Eval metrics — loss, PPL, accuracy at latest checkpoint
  • Learning rate — is the schedule behaving as expected?
  • GPU memory — any OOM risk?
  • Run status — running / finished / crashed?

W&B dashboard link (include in summary for user):

https://wandb.ai/<entity>/<project>/runs/<run_id>

This gives the auto-review-loop richer signal than just screen output — training dynamics, loss curves, and metric trends over time.

Step 4: Summarize Results

Present results in a comparison table:

| Experiment | Metric | Delta vs Baseline | Status |
|-----------|--------|-------------------|--------|
| Baseline  | X.XX   | —                 | done   |
| Method A  | X.XX   | +Y.Y              | done   |

Step 5: Interpret

  • Compare against known baselines
  • Flag unexpected results (negative delta, NaN, divergence)
  • Suggest next steps based on findings

Step 6: Feishu Notification (if configured)

After results are collected, check ~/.claude/feishu.json:

  • Send experiment_done notification: results summary table, delta vs baseline
  • If config absent or mode "off": skip entirely (no-op)

Key Rules

  • Always show raw numbers before interpretation
  • Compare against the correct baseline (same config)
  • Note if experiments are still running (check progress bars, iteration counts)
  • If results look wrong, check training logs for errors before concluding
  • Vast.ai cost awareness: When monitoring vast.ai instances, report the running cost (hours * $/hr from vast-instances.json). If all experiments on an instance are done, remind the user to run /vast-gpu destroy <instance_id> to stop billing
  • Modal cost awareness: Modal auto-scales to zero — no idle billing. When reporting results from Modal runs, note the actual execution time and estimated cost (time * $/hr from the GPU tier used). No cleanup action needed

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.