monitor-experiment
Skill2 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Monitor running experiments, check progress, collect results. Use when user says "check results", "is it done", "monitor", or wants experiment output.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 4 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
4
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 44
If hardcopy fails, check for log files or tee output.
- Common: line 51
If JSON results exist, fetch and parse them:
- Very specific: line 121
After results are collected, check ~/.claude/feishu.json:
- Very specific: line 123
If config absent or mode "off": skip entirely (no-op)
- Common: line 126
Always show raw numbers before interpretation
- Common: line 129
If results look wrong, check training logs for errors before concluding
- Very specific: line 130
Vast.ai cost awareness: When monitoring vast.ai instances, report the running cost (hours * $/hr from vast-instances.json).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Monitor Experiment Results
Monitor: $ARGUMENTS
Workflow
Step 1: Check What's Running
SSH server:
ssh <server> "screen -ls"Vast.ai instance (read ssh_host, ssh_port from vast-instances.json):
ssh -p <PORT> root@<HOST> "screen -ls"Also check vast.ai instance status:
vastai show instancesModal (when gpu: modal in CLAUDE.md):
modal app list # List running/recent apps
modal app logs <app> # Stream logs from a running appModal apps auto-terminate when done — if it's not in the list, it already finished. Check results via modal volume ls <volume> or local output.
Step 2: Collect Output from Each Screen
For each screen session, capture the last N lines:
ssh <server> "screen -S <name> -X hardcopy /tmp/screen_<name>.txt && tail -50 /tmp/screen_<name>.txt"If hardcopy fails, check for log files or tee output.
Step 3: Check for JSON Result Files
ssh <server> "ls -lt <results_dir>/*.json 2>/dev/null | head -20"If JSON results exist, fetch and parse them:
ssh <server> "cat <results_dir>/<latest>.json"Step 3.5: Pull W&B Metrics (when wandb: true in CLAUDE.md)
Skip this step entirely if wandb is not set or is false in CLAUDE.md.
Pull training curves and metrics from Weights & Biases via Python API:
# List recent runs in the project
ssh <server> "python3 -c \"
import wandb
api = wandb.Api()
runs = api.runs('<entity>/<project>', per_page=10)
for r in runs:
print(f'{r.id} {r.state} {r.name} {r.summary.get(\"eval/loss\", \"N/A\")}')
\""
# Pull specific metrics from a run (last 50 steps)
ssh <server> "python3 -c \"
import wandb, json
api = wandb.Api()
run = api.run('<entity>/<project>/<run_id>')
history = list(run.scan_history(keys=['train/loss', 'eval/loss', 'eval/ppl', 'train/lr'], page_size=50))
print(json.dumps(history[-10:], indent=2))
\""
# Pull run summary (final metrics)
ssh <server> "python3 -c \"
import wandb, json
api = wandb.Api()
run = api.run('<entity>/<project>/<run_id>')
print(json.dumps(dict(run.summary), indent=2, default=str))
\""What to extract:
- Training loss curve — is it converging? diverging? plateauing?
- Eval metrics — loss, PPL, accuracy at latest checkpoint
- Learning rate — is the schedule behaving as expected?
- GPU memory — any OOM risk?
- Run status — running / finished / crashed?
W&B dashboard link (include in summary for user):
https://wandb.ai/<entity>/<project>/runs/<run_id>This gives the auto-review-loop richer signal than just screen output — training dynamics, loss curves, and metric trends over time.
Step 4: Summarize Results
Present results in a comparison table:
| Experiment | Metric | Delta vs Baseline | Status |
|-----------|--------|-------------------|--------|
| Baseline | X.XX | — | done |
| Method A | X.XX | +Y.Y | done |Step 5: Interpret
- Compare against known baselines
- Flag unexpected results (negative delta, NaN, divergence)
- Suggest next steps based on findings
Step 6: Feishu Notification (if configured)
After results are collected, check ~/.claude/feishu.json:
- Send
experiment_donenotification: results summary table, delta vs baseline - If config absent or mode
"off": skip entirely (no-op)
Key Rules
- Always show raw numbers before interpretation
- Compare against the correct baseline (same config)
- Note if experiments are still running (check progress bars, iteration counts)
- If results look wrong, check training logs for errors before concluding
- Vast.ai cost awareness: When monitoring vast.ai instances, report the running cost (hours * $/hr from
vast-instances.json). If all experiments on an instance are done, remind the user to run/vast-gpu destroy <instance_id>to stop billing - Modal cost awareness: Modal auto-scales to zero — no idle billing. When reporting results from Modal runs, note the actual execution time and estimated cost (time * $/hr from the GPU tier used). No cleanup action needed
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 5
- wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep★ 18k87% same
- zjunlp/Mechanist★ 7558% same
- EarthOnlinePlayer5732/my-skills★ 1787% same
- Yusong-Enceladus/claude-skills★ 896% same
- talhaMah56/claude_skills★ 087% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- allenai/open-instruct★ 3.9ksame name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository84 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/rules/common/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/rules/zh/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- ablation-plannerSkill
- alphaxivSkill
- analyze-resultsSkill
- arxivSkill
- auto-paper-improvement-loopSkill
- auto-review-loop-llmSkill
- auto-review-loop-minimaxSkill
- auto-review-loopSkill
- citation-auditSkill
- claims-draftingSkill
- comm-lit-review-claude-singleSkill
- deepxivSkill
- dse-loopSkill
- embodiment-descriptionSkill
- exa-searchSkill
- experiment-auditSkill
- experiment-bridgeSkill
- experiment-planSkill
- experiment-queueSkill
- feishu-notifySkill
- figure-descriptionSkill
- figure-specSkill
- formula-derivationSkill
- gemini-searchSkill
- grant-proposalSkill
- idea-creatorSkill
- idea-discovery-robotSkill
- idea-discoverySkill
- invention-structuringSkill
- jurisdiction-formatSkill
- kill-argumentSkill
- mermaid-diagramSkill
- meta-optimizeSkill
- novelty-checkSkill
- openalexSkill
- overleaf-syncSkill
- paper-claim-auditSkill
- paper-compileSkill
- paper-figureSkill
- paper-illustration-image2Skill
- paper-illustrationSkill
- paper-planSkill
- paper-posterSkill
- paper-slidesSkill
- paper-talkSkill
- paper-writeSkill
- paper-writingSkill
- patent-novelty-checkSkill
- patent-pipelineSkill
- patent-reviewSkill
- pixel-artSkill
- prior-art-searchSkill
- proof-checkerSkill
- proof-writerSkill
- qzcliSkill
- rebuttalSkill
- research-litSkill
- research-pipelineSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

