post-merge
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Post-merge verification checklist. Triggers ONLY when: a PR has just been merged via gh pr merge. Do NOT trigger when: discussing merge strategy or planning future merges.
- Commits and pushes
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jerseycheese/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- ihyonoo/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- manastalukdar/ai-devstudiotheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- shinobiashi/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- jerseycheese/agent-skills★ 4same name
- manastalukdar/ai-devstudio★ 1same name
- ihyonoo/skills★ 0same name
- shinobiashi/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- claude.mdCLAUDE.md
- biz-thinkSkill
- biz-validateSkill
- brand-buildSkill
- community-engageSkill
- content-createSkill
- content-distributeSkill
- copy-craftSkill
- data-decideSkill
- finance-opsSkill
- growth-trackSkill
- infra-opsSkill
- issue-createSkill
- legal-guardSkill
- pre-codeSkill
- pre-commitSkill
- pre-prSkill
- product-evalSkill
- project-initSkill
- retroSkill
- roadmap-steerSkill
- sales-closeSkill
- search-evalSkill
- self-reviewSkill
- sopSkill
- staging-verifySkill
- support-opsSkill
- test-gateSkill
- ux-auditSkill
- work-breakdownSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈14
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
After every PR merge, execute ALL FIVE steps.
- Distinctive: line 13
After merging to main and deployment is live, run dual-track testing:
- Distinctive: line 17
Use Playwright MCP to test the deployed production site.
- Distinctive: line 35
After agent testing completes, invite the user to test:
- Distinctive: line 43
After both rounds of testing:
- Very specific: line 51
Update the issue body: replace - [ ] with - [x] for all completed criteria
- Distinctive: line 52
Use the GitHub API to update:
- Distinctive: line 56
If any acceptance criteria are NOT met, do not close the issue — go back and fix
- Distinctive: line 63
Only close after Steps 1 and 2 are complete
- Distinctive: line 66
After closing the issue, check if the milestone is now complete:
- Very specific: line 68
If a milestone exists, check for remaining open issues: gh issue list --milestone "MILESTONE_NAME" --state open
- Very specific: line 69
If 0 open issues remain → this milestone is complete.
- Very specific: line 76
Delete IMMEDIATELY after merge — do not defer: If the PR was squash-merged, git loses merge tracking.
- Distinctive: line 77
Verify deletion: git branch -a should no longer show the branch
- Very specific: line 88
If no prior tag exists, start at v0.1.0
- Very specific: line 98
Run gh release view vX.Y.Z to confirm it was created
- Distinctive: line 99
Verify the tag: git tag -l vX.Y.Z
- Distinctive: line 103
All five steps. Every merge.
- Distinctive: line 107
If release: "v[X.Y.Z] released.
- Distinctive: line 111
All issues done → "Run staging-verify, then release"
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Post-Merge Verification Checklist
After every PR merge, execute ALL FIVE steps. Every time. No exceptions. Skipping any step is a process failure, not a shortcut.
Step 1: Production Functional Testing (after deployment)
After merging to main and deployment is live, run dual-track testing:
Agent Testing (Playwright on production URL)
Use Playwright MCP to test the deployed production site. This is where functional testing happens — NOT in staging-verify.
- Walk the complete user journey: landing page → signup/login → main feature → key action → result
- Test every feature in the delta: for each issue merged, exercise the feature on production
- Test at multiple viewports: desktop (1280px) + mobile (375px)
- Click every button: "button exists" ≠ "button works." Test the FUNCTION, not the EXISTENCE
- Screenshot everything: take screenshots as evidence of each verification
- Check for regressions: navigate 3-5 core pages/flows beyond the delta
Report format:
## Production Test Report
| Feature | User Journey | Desktop | Mobile | Status |
|---------|-------------|---------|--------|--------|User Testing
After agent testing completes, invite the user to test:
- Tell the user: "Production is deployed at [URL]. Please test the new features and report any issues."
- User tests at their own pace — this is NOT a blocker for the current merge
- When user provides feedback: create issues immediately for each bug/improvement
- Do NOT argue "technically correct" — if the user says it doesn't work, it doesn't work
Consolidate Bugs
After both rounds of testing:
- Combine agent-found and user-found issues into a prioritized list
- Create GitHub issues for each bug using
issue-createskill - These issues enter the NEXT development cycle — they do not block the current release
Step 2: Check Acceptance Criteria Boxes
- Go to the linked GitHub issue
- Update the issue body: replace
- [ ]with- [x]for all completed criteria - Use the GitHub API to update:
gh api repos/OWNER/REPO/issues/NUMBER -X PATCH -f body="..." - If any acceptance criteria are NOT met, do not close the issue — go back and fix
Step 3: Close the Issue
- Run:
gh issue close NUMBER - Important:
Closes #Xin the PR body only auto-closes issues when merging to the default branch (main), notdev - Since we merge to
devfirst, you must close issues manually - Only close after Steps 1 and 2 are complete
Milestone Completion Check: After closing the issue, check if the milestone is now complete:
- Get the issue's milestone:
gh issue view NUMBER --json milestone --jq '.milestone.title' - If a milestone exists, check for remaining open issues:
gh issue list --milestone "MILESTONE_NAME" --state open - If 0 open issues remain → this milestone is complete. Immediately invoke
retro— do not wait for the user to ask. - This check is mandatory, not optional. Every closed issue could be the last one in a milestone.
Step 4: Delete the Branch
- Remote: use
--delete-branchflag when merging PR, orgit push origin --delete <branch-name> - Local:
git branch -d <branch-name> - Delete IMMEDIATELY after merge — do not defer. If the PR was squash-merged, git loses merge tracking. The longer you wait, the harder it is to delete with
-d(safe delete). Deleting right after merge avoids this entirely. - Verify deletion:
git branch -ashould no longer show the branch
Step 5: Create GitHub Release (main merges only)
This step applies ONLY when the merged PR was dev → main (a release merge). Skip for feature → dev merges.
Determine version bump by analyzing commits since the last release tag:
- Run:
git log $(git describe --tags --abbrev=0 2>/dev/null || echo HEAD~50)..HEAD --oneline - Contains
feat:orfeat(→ minor bump (new functionality) - Contains only
fix:orfix(→ patch bump (bug fixes only) - Contains
BREAKING CHANGEor!:→ major bump - If no prior tag exists, start at
v0.1.0
Create the release:
gh release create vX.Y.Z --title "vX.Y.Z" --generate-notes --latest--generate-notesauto-generates release notes from merged PR titles- Tags the current
mainHEAD
Verify the release:
- Run
gh release view vX.Y.Zto confirm it was created - Verify the tag:
git tag -l vX.Y.Z
Reminder
All five steps. Every merge. No shortcuts. If you skip branch cleanup today, you will have 50 stale branches next month. If you skip verification, you will ship broken features. The process exists because it works.
Next Steps
Report to user: "Issue #[N] merged. [N/total] complete. AC: [all checked / gaps]. Branch: [deleted]" If release: "v[X.Y.Z] released. Production test: [N bugs found]. Please test [URL]."
Suggested next steps (user decides):
- More issues remain → "Continue with next issue"
- All issues done → "Run staging-verify, then release"
- Release done → "Test the product, then run retro"
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

