agentleFS
Docat0209Docat0209/SoloForge/skills/biz-validate/SKILL.md

biz-validate

Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Runs iterative hypothesis validation loop. Triggers ONLY when: biz-think acid test fails, user explicitly asks to validate a business assumption, or user says to pivot. Do NOT trigger when: discussing business strategy casually or during product development.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run this skill when:

    line 19
  2. Distinctive:

    Always prefer skin-in-the-game data (money, time invested) over opinions (surveys, "I would use this")

    line 107
  3. Distinctive:

    If an experiment takes more than 1 week, it's too expensive.

    line 109
  4. Distinctive:

    Search the web for existing data before running your own experiment (someone may have already validated this)

    line 110
  5. Very specific:

    Kill criteria: if 3+ pivots on the same core idea all fail, kill it entirely.

    line 132
  6. Very specific:

    After each cycle, update these in auto memory (memory/validation_log.md):

    line 138
  7. Distinctive:

    No behavioral evidence of willingness to pay after 3 experiment cycles

    line 156
  8. Distinctive:

    You are almost certainly at Stage 1: Do not skip to Stage 2 thinking.

    line 173
  9. Distinctive:

    All validated → "Run brand-build, then work-breakdown"

    line 179

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

biz-validate: Business Hypothesis Validation Loop

A cyclical SOP based on Running Lean (Ash Maurya), Pretotyping (Alberto Savoia), and Hypothesis-Driven Entrepreneurship (HBS). This skill LOOPS — it does not run once and stop.

Framework sources:

  • Running Lean 3rd Ed (Ash Maurya) — macro stages: Problem/Solution Fit → Product/Market Fit → Scale
  • Pretotyping (Alberto Savoia, Google) — behavioral proof before building
  • Reflect-Inquire-Learn (Eisenmann/Ries, HBS) — single experiment cycle

Entry Conditions

Run this skill when:

  • biz-think acid test fails (cannot complete the one-sentence answer)
  • An assumption in the business model needs validation
  • Pivoting after a failed experiment
  • User says "validate this" or "test this idea"

The Loop: Reflect → Hypothesize → Experiment → Learn → Update

     ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
     │                                     │
     ▼                                     │
  REFLECT                                  │
  What is the riskiest assumption?         │
     │                                     │
     ▼                                     │
  HYPOTHESIZE                              │
  "At least X% of [target] will            │
   [action] if [condition]"                │
     │                                     │
     ▼                                     │
  EXPERIMENT                               │
  Run the cheapest possible test            │
  (hours, not weeks)                       │
     │                                     │
     ▼                                     │
  LEARN                                    │
  Did we hit the threshold?                │
     │                                     │
     ├── NO → Pivot or kill ──────────────►│
     │         Update canvas, re-enter     │
     │                                     │
     ├── YES → Next assumption ───────────►│
     │                                     │
     └── ALL VALIDATED → EXIT ─────────────┘

Max iterations: 5 per assumption. If an assumption cannot be validated in 5 cycles, kill the idea or pivot the fundamental approach.


Step 1: REFLECT — Identify the Riskiest Assumption

List all assumptions the business model depends on. Rank by:

  • Impact if wrong: would this kill the business? (High/Medium/Low)
  • Uncertainty: how confident are we? (Guess/Belief/Tested)

Pick the assumption that is High-impact AND Guess/Belief. This is what you test first.

Common assumption categories:

  • Problem assumption: "This problem exists and is painful enough to pay to solve"
  • Solution assumption: "Our solution actually solves this problem"
  • Pricing assumption: "They will pay $X for this"
  • Channel assumption: "We can reach them through [channel]"
  • Retention assumption: "They will keep using this after the first time"

Step 2: HYPOTHESIZE — Write a Testable XYZ Hypothesis

Format (Savoia's Pretotyping):

"At least X% of [target audience] will [desired action] if [condition/offering]"

Rules:

  • X must be a specific number, not "some" or "many"
  • Target audience must be concrete, not "developers" but "DevOps engineers who use Terraform"
  • Desired action must be behavioral (click, sign up, pay), not attitudinal (say they like it)
  • Set the threshold BEFORE running the experiment, not after

Also set fail conditions: what result would KILL this hypothesis? Write it down. If you can't define failure, you can't learn.


Step 3: EXPERIMENT — Run the Cheapest Possible Test

Experiment types (ordered by cost, cheapest first):

TypeWhatTimeCostEvidence Strength
Fake DoorLanding page with signup/buy button, no product behind it2 hours$0Medium (interest, not commitment)
ConciergeManually deliver the service to 3-5 people1-3 days$0High (real usage data)
Wizard of OzUsers think it's automated, but you do it manually behind the scenes3-5 days$0High (real behavior)
Pre-sellTake actual payments before the product exists1 day$0Highest (money moved)
Smoke TestAds/posts pointing to a signup page, measure conversion1 day$0-50Medium (intent, not usage)

Rules:

  • Always prefer skin-in-the-game data (money, time invested) over opinions (surveys, "I would use this")
  • "Would you use this?" is worthless. "Here's the payment page, buy now" is data.
  • If an experiment takes more than 1 week, it's too expensive. Simplify.
  • Search the web for existing data before running your own experiment (someone may have already validated this)

Step 4: LEARN — Evaluate Against Threshold

Compare results to your XYZ hypothesis threshold:

ResultAction
Exceeded thresholdAssumption validated. Move to next riskiest assumption.
Close to threshold (within 20%)Iterate: adjust offering, pricing, or messaging. Re-run experiment.
Far below thresholdAssumption invalidated. Decide: pivot or kill.

Pivot options (Steve Blank):

  • Zoom-in pivot: one feature of the product becomes the whole product
  • Zoom-out pivot: the whole product becomes one feature of a larger product
  • Customer segment pivot: same product, different audience
  • Customer need pivot: same audience, different problem
  • Channel pivot: same product, different distribution channel
  • Revenue model pivot: same product, different pricing/monetization

Kill criteria: if 3+ pivots on the same core idea all fail, kill it entirely. Start fresh with a new idea through biz-think.


Step 5: UPDATE — Revise the Lean Canvas

After each cycle, update these in auto memory (memory/validation_log.md):

  • Experiment: hypothesis, method, result, date, learning
  • AssumptionStatus: which assumptions are now Validated/Invalidated/Untested
  • LeanCanvas: updated customer segment, problem, solution, channels, revenue based on learnings
  • PivotHistory: if pivoted, record what changed and why

Exit Conditions

Exit to development (invoke pre-code):

  • Problem assumption validated (people have this pain and will pay)
  • Solution assumption validated (your approach solves it)
  • At least 1 person has paid or committed to pay (pre-sale, LOI, deposit)
  • biz-think acid test can now be completed in one sentence

Exit by killing:

  • 3+ pivots failed on the same core idea
  • No behavioral evidence of willingness to pay after 3 experiment cycles
  • Store the kill decision and learnings in auto memory (memory/validation_log.md)

Do NOT exit because you're tired of iterating. Exit only when evidence supports the decision.


Macro Stages (Running Lean Traction Roadmap)

Track which stage you're in:

StageGoalHow You Know You're Done
1. Problem/Solution FitValidate the problem is real and your solution concept resonates5+ people describe the problem unprompted; solution demo gets "when can I use this?"
2. Product/Market FitValidate people will pay and keep using itRepeatable acquisition, activation rate >40%, monthly churn <5%
3. ScaleGrow the validated modelNot your concern until stages 1-2 are done

You are almost certainly at Stage 1. Do not skip to Stage 2 thinking.

Next Steps

Report to user: "Validation [PASS/FAIL]. Assumption: [which one]. Evidence: [what we found]"

Suggested next steps (user decides):

  • All validated → "Run brand-build, then work-breakdown"
  • Kill criteria met → "Start fresh with biz-think"
  • Need experiment → "Run copy-craft for landing page"

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.