job-match-analyzer
Skill0 starsChanged 19 days agoMITView on GitHub
Honestly assess how well a CV matches a job advert before applying. Gives a fit score and verdict (apply, stretch or skip), each requirement as met, partial or missing with evidence, gaps with advice, red flags in the advert, and a calculated ATS keyword score. Use when the user asks "should I apply?", "am I a good fit?" or wants a CV-versus-job comparison without a rewrite.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- ats-scoreSkill
- cover-letter-writerSkill
- cv-tailorSkill
- finance-transformation-cvSkill
- interview-prep-coachSkill
- regional-cv-formatsSkill
- resume-genieSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Read the advert in layers: must-haves, nice-to-haves, the real job (the duties) and signals.
- Very specific: line 36
If the user wants the tailored CV next, hand over to the cv-tailor or resume-genie skill.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Job match analyzer
Tell the candidate the truth about their fit, with evidence, before they spend time on an application.
Workflow
- Extract the text of the CV and the job advert. Save the CV as
cv.txt. - Follow
references/job-analysis.md:- Read the advert in layers: must-haves, nice-to-haves, the real job (the duties) and signals.
- Judge each requirement:
met(direct evidence, quoted),partial(adjacent or implied) ormissing. Never mark something met because it's plausible. - Fit score and verdict:
strong-apply(85+)apply(65–84)stretch(45–64)skip(below 45, or a hard gate is missing)
- Gaps, each with advice: surface hidden evidence, address it in the cover letter, or close it.
- Red flags, pointed out kindly.
- Pick 15–30 ATS keywords in the advert's exact wording, with
importanceandsynonyms. Save them askeywords.json, then calculate the current ATS score:python scripts/ats_score.py cv.txt keywords.json Reply with:
- the verdict and fit score, plus a one-line reason
- the ATS score as calculated
- a requirements table (requirement | status | evidence)
- the top strengths to lead with
- gaps with advice
- red flags
- 4–6 specific tailoring moves
If the user wants the tailored CV next, hand over to the
cv-tailororresume-genieskill.
Rules
- Quote evidence from the CV. Don't paraphrase it into something stronger.
- A missing hard gate (licence, clearance, mandated degree or language) caps the verdict at
skip, however strong the rest is. - Report scores as calculated. Never estimate an ATS score.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

