agentleFS
DexterslabAiDexterslabAi/resume-genie/skills/ats-score/SKILL.md

ats-score

Skill0 starsChanged 19 days agoMITView on GitHub

Calculate a transparent, reproducible ATS (applicant tracking system) score for a CV against a job advert. It uses weighted keyword coverage with synonyms plus format checks, computed by a script rather than guessed, and lists the required keywords that are missing. Use when the user asks for an ATS score, keyword match or "will my CV get through the ATS?".

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. nomanAliShah786/claude-code-job-search★ 4same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read the advert and choose 15–30 keywords, following the keyword section of references/job-analysis.md:

    line 23
  2. Distinctive:

    use the advert's exact wording, including the job title

    line 24
  3. Distinctive:

    add synonyms: the acronym and its expansion, plus spelling variants

    line 26
  4. Distinctive:

    Never estimate or round a score yourself.

    line 45
  5. Distinctive:

    Never advise adding a keyword the candidate can't back up in an interview.

    line 46

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

ATS score

Most AI tools guess an ATS score. This skill calculates one, so the same CV and advert always give the same number, and the user can see exactly why.

How the score works

  • Keyword coverage (75%). Required keywords count double. Plurals, simple stems and listed synonyms match (for example "purchase-to-pay" counts for "P2P"). Matching is literal, like a recruiter's ATS search.
  • Format hygiene (25%). The CV is checked for:
    • an email address and a phone number
    • standard Summary, Skills, Experience and Education headings
    • length between 350 and 1,100 words
    • at least 40% of bullets quantified
    • no unusual characters

Workflow

  1. Save the CV text as cv.txt.
  2. Read the advert and choose 15–30 keywords, following the keyword section of references/job-analysis.md:
    • use the advert's exact wording, including the job title
    • mark terms required if they sit under a requirements heading or are repeated in the duties
    • add synonyms: the acronym and its expansion, plus spelling variants
  3. Save the keywords as keywords.json:
    [{"term": "P2P", "importance": "required", "synonyms": ["procure-to-pay", "purchase-to-pay"]}]
  4. Run:
    python scripts/ats_score.py cv.txt keywords.json
  5. Report:

    • the score, the keyword score and the format score
    • matched keywords
    • missing keywords, required ones first
    • failed format checks

    For each missing required keyword, say honestly whether the CV shows evidence for it elsewhere (then use the advert's wording) or whether it's a real gap.

Rules

  • Never estimate or round a score yourself. Report what the script prints.
  • Never advise adding a keyword the candidate can't back up in an interview.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.