brainstorm
Skill4 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
This skill should be used when the user asks to "brainstorm", "explore ideas", "design a feature", "draft a spec", "capture a spec", or mentions ideation, requirements gathering, spec capture, or brainstorming depth/focus modes. Generates BRAINSTORM/SPEC documents from project + conversation context. Replaces the deprecated /craft:brainstorm command. For session-facet friction or pattern analysis across past sessions, use the brainstorm-insights skill instead.
189 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nielsmadan/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- phuthuycoding/kanban-flowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- baethon/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- CloudChef/atlasclaw-providerstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- LongJohnSilver1504/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use playtest-report, team-polish and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CoralGameSkillplaytest-report
Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.
Also in 9 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillteam-polish
Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality.
Also in 11 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillsoak-test
Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.
Also in 6 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillteam-live-ops
Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +8 more from CoralGame
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 189
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- codeaholicguy/ai-devkit★ 1.7ksame name
- jtydhr88/ComfyTV★ 1.2ksame name
- event-driven-io/emmett★ 562same name
- zaxbysauce/opencode-swarm★ 519same name
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm★ 518same name
- automagik-dev/genie★ 351same name
- namastexlabs/automagik-genie★ 351same name
- bkywksj/knowledge-base★ 340same name
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
179 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- system-architectSkill
- project-detectorSkill
- audit-routerSkill
- command-skill-token-efficiencySkill
- plugin-auditSkill
- sync-featuresSkill
- backend-designerSkill
- devops-helperSkill
- frontend-designerSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- dist-extrasSkill
- distribution-strategistSkill
- homebrew-formula-expertSkill
- homebrew-multi-formulaSkill
- homebrew-setup-wizardSkill
- homebrew-workflow-expertSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- changelog-automationSkill
- claude-md-lifecycleSkill
- guard-auditSkill
- hooksSkill
- insights-applySkill
- mode-controllerSkill
- drive-engineSkill
- plan-orchestratorSkill
- repo-triageSkill
- session-stateSkill
- task-analyzerSkill
- workflow-engineSkill
- orchestrator-resilienceSkill
- project-plannerSkill
- preflight-checkSkill
- releaseSkill
- test-generatorSkill
- test-strategistSkill
- adhd-workflowSkill
- brainstorm-insightsSkill
- grillSkill
- prompt-refinerSkill
- background-task-managerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 156 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 46
If the user wants more, they ask.
- Very specific: line 50
Parse args / detect topic: If no topic, scan conversation, .STATUS, git branch, recent commits.
- Very specific: line 55
Context scan: Check for an existing SPEC or prior brainstorm on the topic, project type, .STATUS version, recent test failures.
- Very specific: line 66
Default category selection is focus-driven (see table below).
- Distinctive: line 82
Default categories by focus:
- Distinctive: line 96
One follow-up offer: After the questions: "Anything else to add, or ready to generate?" — single yes/no-shaped prompt, not a menu of depth …
- Very specific: line 118
Instead: after a spec is captured (Step 7), offer to hand off to the orchestrator via the existing --orch flag / plan-orchestrator skill / …
- Very specific: line 148
When this skill emits a BRAINSTORM or SPEC artifact, it also emits a test-plan scaffold by default.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 156 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Brainstorm
ADHD-friendly ideation with two decision points (not four) and one escape
hatch (not a "switch depth" tree). Transforms a topic + project/git context
into a BRAINSTORM-<topic>-<date>.md or, with the save action, a
docs/specs/SPEC-<topic>-<date>.md.
Boundary With Adjacent Skills
| Skill | Role |
| brainstorm (this) | Generates BRAINSTORM/SPEC documents from topic + context |
brainstorm-insights | Aggregates session facet history into a friction/goals report — unrelated input, unrelated output, split out into its own concern (kept the directory name for path stability; only the Insights operation remains there) |
insights-apply | Consumes a brainstorm-insights report; writes suggestions into CLAUDE.md |
adhd-workflow | Session boundary ops (done, recap, next, focus, stuck, spec-review) |
project-planner | Project-scope planning after a SPEC exists |
plan-orchestrator / --orch flag | Multi-agent implementation planning — see "Going deeper" below |
Typical chain: brainstorm → SPEC → project-planner (breakdown) → adhd-workflow (spec-review/done).
Inputs
- Topic — explicit argument, or inferred from conversation /
.STATUS/ git branch / recent commits. - Depth (quick | default | deep) — controls question count. No "max" tier — see "Going deeper" below for why.
- Focus (feat | arch | ux | api | ui | ops) — shapes output sections.
- Action (optional
save) — capture asSPEC-<topic>-<date>.md.
Depth Budgets
| Depth | Time | Expert Questions |
| quick | < 1 min | 0 |
| default | < 5 min | 2 |
| deep | < 10 min | 6 |
Two decision points total per session: (1) depth+focus, asked together in
one AskUserQuestion call when not provided as arguments; (2) one optional
follow-up — "anything else before I generate this?" — offered once, after
the expert questions, regardless of depth. No per-depth escape-hatch menus,
no "switch depth mid-flow," no milestone re-prompting every N questions.
If the user wants more, they ask; don't build a state machine for it.
Flow
- Parse args / detect topic. If no topic, scan conversation,
.STATUS, git branch, recent commits. 1 topic → use it; 2+ → oneAskUserQuestion; none → ask free-form. - Pick depth + focus (if not provided as arguments) — single
AskUserQuestioncall combining both, not two sequential menus. - Context scan. Check for an existing SPEC or prior brainstorm on the
topic, project type,
.STATUSversion, recent test failures. Pre-fill answers where project state already answers a question. - Expert questions. Per-depth count (0/2/6), from the question bank
(full text and selection logic).
8 categories × 2 questions = 16 base questions, plus 6 project-type
extensions (auto-detected via
utils/claude_md_detector.py). UseAskUserQuestion.
Category override (-C / --categories)
Default category selection is focus-driven (see table below). Override with
-C <list> / --categories <list> (comma-separated, matching commands/brainstorm.md
frontmatter):
| Category | Covers |
req | requirements |
users | target users / audience |
scope | what's in / out of scope |
tech | technical approach, stack |
timeline | sequencing, milestones |
risks | risks, edge cases, failure modes |
existing | existing code/patterns to reuse or replace |
success | success criteria, how to know it's done |
all | every category above (default when -C omitted at deep) |
Default categories by focus:
| Focus | Default categories |
feat | req, users, scope, success |
arch | tech, risks, existing, scope |
api | tech, req, success |
ux | users, scope, success |
ops | tech, risks, timeline |
| (auto/unset) | req, users, tech, success |
Example: /brainstorm "caching" -C tech,risks limits expert questions to the technical and
risk categories regardless of focus.
- One follow-up offer. After the questions: "Anything else to add, or ready to generate?" — single yes/no-shaped prompt, not a menu of depth switches.
- Generate output. Focus-specific sections (user stories for
feat, Mermaid diagram forarch, API endpoints forapi, etc.). Save toBRAINSTORM-<topic>-<date>.md. - Spec capture (action=save, or prompted for feat/arch/api). Ask
user-story + acceptance criteria, render full SPEC template, write to
docs/specs/SPEC-<topic>-<date>.md. - Going-deeper offer (optional, post-spec only) — see below.
Going Deeper: No In-Skill Agent Delegation
This skill does not spawn subagents itself. The pre-redesign version had
a "max" depth that launched 1-2 background agents directly from inside
brainstorm — duplicating what orchestrator-v2 already does (wave
checkpoints, file-based results, explicit model routing, AskUserQuestion
confirmation before spawning), but without those safeguards. It also
referenced agent type names that didn't exist (backend-architect,
product-strategist, etc.), which silently fell back to general-purpose
with no model pin — see agents/orchestrator-v2.md BEHAVIOR 2.
Instead: after a spec is captured (Step 7), offer to hand off to the
orchestrator via the existing --orch flag / plan-orchestrator skill /
/craft:plan <spec-path>. One delegation mechanism, already
hardened, instead of two.
Mandatory Interactive Steps
Even when all arguments are provided as flags, the per-depth expert-question count (0/2/6) is never skipped. Skipping silently is a known regression pattern. The depth/focus menu may be skipped when args supply them — the questions themselves may not.
Removed: Per-Invocation Question-Count Override
The pre-redesign version supported colon notation (d:5, m:12, q:0) to override the
per-depth expert-question count on a single invocation. This is intentionally not carried
forward — the fixed per-depth counts (0/2/6) are part of the same two-decision-point
simplification described above ("Going Deeper"); a per-call override reintroduces the kind of
escape-hatch menu this redesign removed. If a specific topic genuinely needs more than 6
expert questions, run /brainstorm at deep, then use the "anything else before I generate
this?" follow-up offer (Flow step 5) to add more — don't request a count override.
Outputs
BRAINSTORM-<topic>-<date>.md(always — even when also saving a spec).docs/specs/SPEC-<topic>-<date>.md(whensaveaction selected).- Terminal summary with paths and suggested next command.
Test-Plan Scaffolding (default-on)
When this skill emits a BRAINSTORM or SPEC artifact, it also emits a
test-plan scaffold by default. Pass --no-tests to suppress the section.
Tier-inference rule
Infer tiers from the shape of the artifact/change being scoped:
| Change shape | Tiers to emit |
| Flag / frontmatter / prose only | e2e + dogfood |
| + new parser or script | + unit |
| + cross-command data flow | + integration |
| + external dependency change | + dependency |
| + new command / skill / agent | + count-cascade dogfood |
Unselected tiers print as N/A — <reason> (never empty stubs).
Emission rules
- Emit test stubs red-first (failing placeholder, not passing no-op).
- Each stub carries
# TODO(author): delete if not contract-bearinguntil the author confirms the contract. - Scaffold templates live in
../brainstorm-insights/references/scaffold-templates.md(shared withorchestrate) — point to that file, do not duplicate templates inline.
--yes non-suppression
--yes auto-accepts prompts only; the test-plan and Documentation sections
are content and are still emitted under --yes. Only --no-tests /
--no-docs remove them.
Documentation Scaffolding (default-on)
When this skill emits a BRAINSTORM or SPEC artifact, it also emits a
Documentation section by default. Pass --no-docs to suppress the section.
Which docs to emit
Derive which documentation artifacts are needed by running the existing
doc-scorer rubric from skills/orchestration/references/doc-impact-rubric.md (threshold ≥3). Do not
invent a new rubric — reuse the scorer as the single source of truth. For
each doc type the scorer evaluates (guide, refcard, demo, mermaid),
pre-check ([x]) boxes that meet the threshold, mark the rest
N/A — score <N>.
Count-cascade exclusion
Auto-docs emission touches only semantic docs — CHANGELOG [Unreleased]
mirror, guide/refcard/tutorial prose. It never touches version or count
lines; those are excluded and stay in bump-version.sh.
Related Skills
brainstorm-insights— friction/goals reporting from session history (was bundled with this skill; now separate, directory name kept for path stability).project-planner— breakdown after a SPEC exists.plan-orchestrator/--orch— multi-agent implementation, post-spec.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

