orchestrator-resilience
Skill4 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
Reference templates for orchestrator-v2 agent error handling, retry/backoff, circuit breaker, escalation, and execution timeline display. Load when the orchestrator hits an agent failure, needs to show a retry/timeout/escalation report, or the user asks for a `timeline` view. NOT needed for normal happy-path orchestration — only for error recovery and timeline display.
- Reads credentials
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- system-architectSkill
- project-detectorSkill
- audit-routerSkill
- command-skill-token-efficiencySkill
- plugin-auditSkill
- sync-featuresSkill
- backend-designerSkill
- devops-helperSkill
- frontend-designerSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- dist-extrasSkill
- distribution-strategistSkill
- homebrew-formula-expertSkill
- homebrew-multi-formulaSkill
- homebrew-setup-wizardSkill
- homebrew-workflow-expertSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- changelog-automationSkill
- claude-md-lifecycleSkill
- guard-auditSkill
- hooksSkill
- insights-applySkill
- mode-controllerSkill
- drive-engineSkill
- plan-orchestratorSkill
- repo-triageSkill
- session-stateSkill
- task-analyzerSkill
- workflow-engineSkill
- project-plannerSkill
- preflight-checkSkill
- releaseSkill
- test-generatorSkill
- test-strategistSkill
- adhd-workflowSkill
- brainstorm-insightsSkill
- brainstormSkill
- grillSkill
- prompt-refinerSkill
- background-task-managerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 75
When an agent fails after retries, select alternative approach:
- Distinctive: line 164
When auto-recovery fails or is inappropriate:
- Distinctive: line 195
When multiple agents fail:
- Very specific: line 247
When user says timeline, show visual execution timeline:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Orchestrator Resilience & Timeline Reference
Reference material extracted from agents/orchestrator-v2.md to keep that file's
always-loaded system prompt smaller. The orchestrator only needs this content when
an agent actually fails, times out, or the user requests a timeline — not on every
spawn. See agents/orchestrator-v2.md BEHAVIOR 5 and BEHAVIOR 9 for the pointers
into this skill.
Error Categorization
Classify errors to determine appropriate recovery strategy:
| Category | Examples | Recovery Strategy |
| Transient | Network timeout, rate limit, temporary file lock | Retry with backoff |
| Resource | Out of memory, disk full, process limit | Queue or wait, then retry |
| Configuration | Missing dependency, wrong path, invalid config | Auto-fix or escalate |
| Logical | Type error, failed test, syntax error | Investigate, then fix or escalate |
| Permanent | File not found, permission denied (after retry) | Escalate to user |
Retry Logic with Exponential Backoff
## 🔄 RETRY STRATEGY
**Error category**: Transient (network timeout)
**Agent**: code-1
**Attempt**: 2/3
**Previous wait**: 2 seconds
**Current wait**: 4 seconds (exponential backoff)
**Next wait**: 8 seconds (if needed)
### Backoff Schedule
| Attempt | Wait Time | Cumulative |
|---------|-----------|------------|
| 1 | 0s | 0s |
| 2 | 2s | 2s |
| 3 | 4s | 6s |
| 4 | 8s | 14s |
| 5 | 16s (max) | 30s |
**Modified approach**: Using alternate API endpoint
**Timeout**: 30s max per retry
[Retrying with modified approach...]Timeout Handling
## ⏱️ TIMEOUT MANAGEMENT
**Agent**: test-1
**Task**: Full test suite execution
**Timeout**: 120s (2 minutes)
**Elapsed**: 125s
**Status**: ⚠️ Timeout exceeded
### Timeout Response
1. **Soft timeout** (at 100%): Send interrupt signal
2. **Wait grace period**: 10 seconds
3. **Hard timeout** (at 110%): Force terminate
4. **Fallback**: Run subset of tests (fast tests only)
**Action**: Terminated test-1, spawning test-1-fast with reduced scopeFallback Agent Selection
When an agent fails after retries, select alternative approach:
## 🔄 FALLBACK AGENT SELECTION
**Original agent**: arch-1 (architecture task)
**Failure**: Exceeded context budget (3 consecutive failures)
**Root cause**: Task too complex for single agent
### Fallback Strategy
1. **Decompose**: Break into smaller subtasks
2. **Route**: Dispatch each subtask as its own `general-purpose` agent with a narrower prompt
3. **Escalate**: Report to orchestrator for replanning
**Action taken**: Decomposing architecture task into 3 subtasks (task labels below describe
the role each agent plays, not a named `subagent_type` — all dispatch through
`general-purpose`, per craft's actual agent roster):
- [AGENT-A1] Data model design → general-purpose
- [AGENT-A2] API design → general-purpose
- [AGENT-A3] Integration → general-purpose
**ETA**: 15 min (vs 8 min original estimate)Circuit Breaker Pattern
Prevent cascade failures by tracking agent reliability:
## ⚡ CIRCUIT BREAKER STATUS
| Agent | Success Rate | Circuit State | Action |
|-------|--------------|---------------|--------|
| code-1 | 95% (19/20) | 🟢 CLOSED | Normal operation |
| test-1 | 60% (3/5) | 🟡 HALF-OPEN | Limited retries |
| doc-1 | 20% (1/5) | 🔴 OPEN | Bypass, use fallback |
### Circuit States
- **CLOSED** (healthy): Normal operation, full retry budget
- **HALF-OPEN** (degraded): Limited retries (max 2), monitoring
- **OPEN** (failing): Skip agent, use fallback or escalate
**Trigger**: 3 consecutive failures → OPEN state
**Recovery**: After 60s cooldown → HALF-OPEN, attempt 1 retry
**Success criteria**: 2 consecutive successes → CLOSED stateError Response Protocol
## 🔴 ERROR ENCOUNTERED
**Agent**: test-1
**Phase**: Unit test execution
**Error category**: Logical
**Error**:Error in medci(): argument "alpha" is missing
**Diagnosis**: Missing default parameter
**Severity**: 🟡 Medium (blocks tests, not code)
**Recovery difficulty**: Low (auto-fixable)
### Recovery Options
1. **Auto-fix**: Add default `alpha = 0.05` [RECOMMENDED]
- Confidence: High (90%)
- ETA: < 30 seconds
- Risk: Low (standard default value)
2. **Investigate**: Show function signature, check docs
- Confidence: Medium (60%)
- ETA: 2-3 minutes
- Risk: None (read-only)
3. **Escalate**: Pause and report to user
- Confidence: N/A
- ETA: Depends on user response
- Risk: None (manual intervention)
**Action taken**: Auto-fix applied (Option 1)
**Verification**: Re-running tests with default parameter...
**Result**: ✅ Tests passing (15/15)Escalation Paths
When auto-recovery fails or is inappropriate:
## 🆘 ESCALATION REQUIRED
**Agent**: code-1
**Escalation level**: 2 (agent → orchestrator → user)
**Reason**: Logical error requires design decision
### Escalation Hierarchy
| Level | Handler | Response Time | Scope |
|-------|---------|---------------|-------|
| 0 | Agent self-recovery | < 5s | Auto-fix, retry |
| 1 | Orchestrator recovery | < 30s | Fallback agent, decompose |
| 2 | User decision | Variable | Design choice, manual fix |
| 3 | Abort | Immediate | Unrecoverable error |Recovery Strategies by Mode
| Mode | Auto-fix Threshold | Max Retries | Escalate On |
| debug | Low (20%) | 5 | Any error (verbose) |
| default | Medium (60%) | 3 | Permanent errors |
| optimize | High (80%) | 2 | Critical only |
| release | Very High (95%) | 1 | All errors (thorough) |
Auto-fix threshold: Confidence level required to auto-fix without escalation
Error Aggregation
When multiple agents fail:
## 📊 ERROR SUMMARY (Multiple Failures)
**Wave**: Add authentication system
**Agents**: 4 spawned, 2 failed, 1 blocked, 1 success
### Failed Agents
| Agent | Error | Category | Retries | Resolution |
|-------|-------|----------|---------|------------|
| code-1 | Type error | Logical | 0/3 | ✅ Auto-fixed |
| test-1 | Import error | Configuration | 2/3 | 🔄 Retrying |
| doc-1 | - | - | - | ⏸️ Blocked (waiting for code-1) |
| arch-1 | - | - | - | ✅ Success |
### Root Cause Analysis
**Primary issue**: Type definition missing in codebase
**Cascade effect**: test-1 depends on code-1 fix
**Resolution**: code-1 fix unblocks test-1 and doc-1
### Recovery Plan
1. ✅ code-1: Auto-fixed type error (completed)
2. 🔄 test-1: Retry with fixed types (in progress)
3. ⏸️ doc-1: Resume after test-1 completes
4. ✅ arch-1: No action needed (success)
**ETA**: ~3 min (bounded by test-1 retry)Self-Healing Mechanisms
## 🔧 SELF-HEALING ACTIVE
**Issue detected**: Repeated configuration errors in test-1
**Pattern recognized**: Missing environment variable (DATABASE_URL)
**Confidence**: 85%
### Auto-Healing Actions
1. ✅ Detected pattern (3 failures with same error)
2. ✅ Identified root cause (env var missing)
3. ✅ Applied fix (added to .env.example)
4. ✅ Updated agent instructions (include env setup)
5. 🔄 Retrying with fix applied...
**Learning**: Future agents will check .env setup proactively
**Persistence**: Pattern saved to .craft/cache/learned-patterns.jsonExecution Timeline View
When user says timeline, show visual execution timeline:
## ⏱️ EXECUTION TIMELINE
TIME 0 1m 2m 3m 4m 5m 6m ─────────┼─────┼─────┼─────┼─────┼─────┼─────┤ arch-1 ██████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ✅ 1.2m code-1 ░░░░░░██████████████████░░░░░░░░░░░ 🟡 3.5m code-2 ░░░░░░░░░░██████████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ✅ 2.1m test-1 ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░████████░░░░░░░ 🟡 1.8m doc-1 ░░░░░░░░░░████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ✅ 0.8m ─────────┼─────┼─────┼─────┼─────┼─────┼─────┤ NOW ▲
**Summary**:
- Completed: 3/5 agents
- In progress: 2 agents
- **ETA**: ~2 min remaining (bounded by test-1)
**Parallel efficiency**: 78% (vs sequential: would take 9.4m)Timeline Controls
| Command | Action |
timeline | Show current timeline |
timeline live | Auto-refresh every 30s |
timeline zoom 2m | Focus on last 2 minutes |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

