agentleFS
Beskars-CodeBeskars-Code/Skills/skills/review-loop/SKILL.md

review-loop

Skill0 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user asks for repeated review and correction rounds on a branch or PR within a finite budget, five rounds by default. A single review pass goes to review.

54 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use motion-design, polish and 7 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • soilmassSkill

    motion-design

    Create animations and motion graphics using industry standards. Use when asked to animate UI elements, create video content, implement transitions, or build motion systems. Implements W3C Design Tokens, Material Design 3 baseline, and Lottie specification compliance.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • HK-hubSkill

    polish

    Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    to-spec

    Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    improve-codebase-architecture

    Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • AWSSkill

    ship

    Finalize dev work on an issue branch — update docs, push, and open a PR.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • NVIDIASkill

    research

    Before designing a feature, research how comparable libraries solve the problem, check best practices, known pitfalls, and upstream changes. Use when starting a new feature, investigating an unfamiliar area, or the user asks to research something.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +3 more from google

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 46 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every run applies code quality, code structure, and Plain language.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Before a decision, use Asking the user.

    line 12
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep the budget and backlog in the existing execution context.

    line 13
  4. Very specific:

    Run the applicable review mode on a fixed scope.

    line 24
  5. Distinctive:

    When nested, this is the current owner's bounded review/remediation phase, not another build orchestrator or a new reviewer per worker …

    line 35

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 46 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Review loop

Every run applies code quality, code structure, and Plain language. Before a decision, use Asking the user. Keep the budget and backlog in the existing execution context.

  1. Identify the pinned diff/base, outcome, current owner and authorized actions. Read review budget, review, and execution remediation.
  2. Reuse the parent's context and consumed rounds, or establish the default budget. Select a reviewer under main-context.md and follow its delegation lifecycle.
  3. Run the applicable review mode on a fixed scope. Keep stable IDs and evidence; return findings to the one owner. PR comments retain /review's publish gate.
  4. Adjudicate once and fix only within authority. Recheck affected acceptance, then use focused remediation review and review new surface as required.
  5. Apply the budget's stopping rules after every round. Report rounds used, resolved and unresolved IDs, disagreements, checks and evidence limits. At five-round exhaustion with required work remaining, end with the shared budget's choice to stop or authorize up to three more rounds, then wait. Completion is a verdict on the checked scope, never automatic approval, comment publication, push or merge.

When nested, this is the current owner's bounded review/remediation phase, not another build orchestrator or a new reviewer per worker slice.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.