review-loop
Skill7 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Iterative review-fix-recheck loop — runs the review skill, auto-fixes only deterministic findings (em dashes, AI footers, curly quotes, code-restating comments), re-runs review, repeats until clean or max 5 iterations. Stops and reports anything that needs human judgment. AUTO-INVOKE when the review skill reports must-fix findings. Triggers include "리뷰 루프 돌려", "review loop", "고치고 다시 확인", "자동 수정하고 재검토", "clean this up".
54 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- revisit-studies/studytheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- Mmbugraaslan/motion-plustheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- zane-tv/holdframetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- seankoji-com/.agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Latand/delegatustheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- blockscout/frontendtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use motion-design, polish and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
soilmassSkillmotion-design
Create animations and motion graphics using industry standards. Use when asked to animate UI elements, create video content, implement transitions, or build motion systems. Implements W3C Design Tokens, Material Design 3 baseline, and Lottie specification compliance.
Also in 5 projects that use this
HK-hubSkillpolish
Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillto-spec
Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GoogleSkillimprove-codebase-architecture
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
Also in 5 projects that use this
AWSSkillship
Finalize dev work on an issue branch — update docs, push, and open a PR.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillcouncil
Convene the persona panel — six orthogonal review lenses — on a target. Cold independent fan-out, debate-to-consensus, synthesized verdict with recorded dissent and a roster manifest.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +4 more from google
Other versions54 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 54
- didi/mpx★ 4ksame name
- blockscout/frontend★ 310same name
- microsoft/bocpy★ 184same name
- 9thLevelSoftware/legion★ 76same name
- microsoft/Trieste★ 53same name
- revisit-studies/study★ 46same name
- timharris707/skills★ 44same name
- Latand/delegatus★ 37same name
- spxrogers/agentsync★ 35same name
- mathruffian-dot/claude-motion-explainer★ 30same name
44 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-tell-cleanupSkill
- branch-guardSkill
- frontend-perf-impact-scanSkill
- jvm-memory-leak-reviewSkill
- kotlin-coroutine-reviewSkill
- nestjs-provider-reviewSkill
- nextjs-app-router-reviewSkill
- parallel-devSkill
- parallel-dispatchSkill
- parallel-prSkill
- pr-impact-scanSkill
- react-hooks-reviewSkill
- reviewSkill
- spring-kafka-listener-reviewSkill
The file
Files
review-loop
리뷰에서 발견한 것 중 확실한 것들만 자동 수정하고, 다시 리뷰를 돌립니다. 판단이 필요한 항목은 사람에게 넘깁니다.
자동 수정 가능 목록 (auto-fixable)
아래 항목만 자동 수정합니다. 나머지는 전부 사람에게 넘깁니다.
| 카테고리 | 패턴 | 수정 방식 |
em-dash | — in comments, strings, docs | : 또는 - 로 교체 |
curly-quote | " " in comments | " " 로 교체 |
ellipsis-char | … in comments | ... 으로 교체 |
ai-footer | 🤖 Generated with Claude Code | 줄 전체 삭제 |
ai-footer | Co-Authored-By: Claude | 줄 전체 삭제 |
section-separator | // ===...===, // ---...---, // ###...### 3줄 블록 | 블록 전체 삭제 |
code-restating-comment | 바로 다음 줄과 1:1 대응되는 주석 | 주석 줄 삭제 |
자동 수정 하지 않는 것:
- 로직, 알고리즘 변경
- 필러 문구 (Note that, This ensures that 등) — 문장 구조 판단 필요
- Javadoc 축약 — WHY 존재 여부 판단 필요
- 변수명, 함수명 변경
Phase 1 — 대상 파일 수집
git diff --name-only $(git merge-base HEAD main)...HEAD변경된 파일 목록을 수집합니다. 리뷰 대상은 이 파일들로 한정합니다.
Phase 2 — 초기 리뷰 실행
review 스킬을 실행해 전체 findings를 수집합니다.
findings를 두 버킷으로 분류합니다:
- auto-fixable: 위 목록에 해당하는 항목 (severity: fix)
- needs-human: 나머지 전부 (severity: consider, 로직 관련, 판단 필요)
auto-fixable이 0개면 Phase 5로 바로 이동합니다.
Phase 3 — 자동 수정 실행
auto-fixable 항목을 파일별로 묶어 순서대로 수정합니다.
수정 원칙:
- 한 파일씩 처리합니다. 여러 패턴이 같은 파일에 있으면 한 번에 수정합니다.
- 수정 전 원본 내용을 메모리에 보관합니다 (롤백 대비).
- 각 수정 후
[수정] <파일>:<줄> — <원문> → <수정안>형식으로 로그를 남깁니다.
Phase 4 — 재검토 루프
수정 완료 후 Phase 2로 돌아갑니다.
종료 조건:
- auto-fixable findings가 0개 → 루프 종료
- 반복 횟수가 5회 도달 → 루프 강제 종료, 남은 항목 리포트
5회 제한은 무한루프 방지를 위한 안전장치입니다. 정상적인 코드베이스라면 1-2회 안에 클린 상태가 됩니다.
Phase 5 — 최종 리포트
## review-loop 결과
반복 횟수: N회
자동 수정 항목: M개
### 수정 내역
[수정] <파일>:<줄> — <원문> → <수정안>
...
### 사람이 확인해야 할 항목 (자동 수정 안 함)
[<severity>] <category>: <요약>
Where: <파일>:<줄>
Why: <이유>
Fix 제안: <제안>
...
### 결과
클린 (auto-fixable 0개) | 5회 초과로 중단 — N개 잔여needs-human 항목이 있으면 목록을 그대로 출력합니다. 없으면 "자동 수정 완료 — 잔여 이슈 없음" 을 출력합니다.
Non-goals
- 로직, 비즈니스 코드를 변경하지 않습니다.
- 테스트를 실행하지 않습니다.
- 커밋은 하지 않습니다. 수정 후 사용자가 직접 커밋합니다.
review-loop자체가 PR을 열거나 닫지 않습니다.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

