agentleFS
BIMpraxisBIMpraxis/opencode-addins/AGENTS.md

opencode-addins

AGENTS.md0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

This repo is indexed in graft/: small linked markdown nodes that explain each system and carry exact file:line spans, kept in sync with the code through git. For ANY task here — understanding how something works, finding where code lives, or scoping a change — get context from the graph before grepping or opening source files. Re-ask freely (it's cheap) and reuse literal identifiers you already have (symbol, error string, file name) as the query. New to this repo? Run…

3 other projects use a version of this; 1 new project in the last 4 weeks, against 1 the 4 before.

Adopted by

Steady: 1 new project took it in the last 4 weeks, 1× the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 1 new projectWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 1 new projectWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 2 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions3 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 3

    1. acryldev/acryl★ 297100% same
    2. Kali-Decoder/Midnight-Skills★ 18100% same
    3. brkmustu/clrinf★ 5100% same

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 0

    None found.

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • Where files are headingNew AGENTS.md files have more rules about keeping secrets out of the code, and fewer about code style.

    Of the AGENTS.md files we read, the 31,774 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.

  • In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run graft map first — a token-budgeted orientation (dir clusters, hubs, hotspots), no LLM, no key.

    line 11
  2. Very specific:

    Run graft ask "<your question>" --source → ranked nodes with the relevant code spans inlined (each hit's ≤8-line crux by default.

    line 14
  3. Very specific:

    Add --direction out for what it calls, or --depth N to walk transitively for the full blast radius.

    line 26
  4. Distinctive:

    If a returned span is truncated ("+N more lines"), open the file at that exact range before finalizing.

    line 34
  5. Very specific:

    After big code changes, refresh the graph with graft build (deterministic, no API key, $0).

    line 39

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md
<!-- graft:start -->

Graft — repo context graph

This repo is indexed in graft/: small linked markdown nodes that explain each system and carry exact file:line spans, kept in sync with the code through git.

For ANY task here — understanding how something works, finding where code lives, or scoping a change — get context from the graph before grepping or opening source files. Re-ask freely (it's cheap) and reuse literal identifiers you already have (symbol, error string, file name) as the query. New to this repo? Run graft map first — a token-budgeted orientation (dir clusters, hubs, hotspots), no LLM, no key.

  • Run graft ask "<your question>" --source → ranked nodes with the relevant code spans inlined (each hit's ≤8-line crux by default; --full for whole definitions when the crux isn't enough). Match the tool to the task shape: for understanding or editing, the top node IS the answer — cite its covers: file:line spans and edit straight from --source. For exhaustive tasks ("every occurrence / every caller of this pattern"), ranked results are top-N, not complete — run graft grep "<literal>" instead (exhaustive over indexed files, grouped by enclosing symbol), falling back to raw grep -rn only for unindexed files.
  • graft skeleton <file> → every definition's signature + span, ~10× cheaper than reading the file; use it to skim an API surface.
  • graft callers <symbol> gives precomputed, exact edges — who calls this. Add --direction out for what it calls, or --depth N to walk transitively for the full blast radius. For structural questions, skip ranking and use this directly.
  • Or browse: graft/INDEX.md lists every node; follow the links.
  • Monorepos and folders of multiple repos rank fairly across sub-projects — hits carry [scope/] labels naming which one they're from. Narrow with graft ask "<task>" --in <scope>/ once you know where you're working.

If a returned span is truncated ("+N more lines"), open the file at that exact range before finalizing. Only open source files when a node genuinely lacks a needed detail, and then at the exact file:line the node points to — never re-read whole files.

After big code changes, refresh the graph with graft build (deterministic, no API key, $0).

<!-- graft:end -->

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.