agentleFS
AndyTechnologiesAndyTechnologies/my-own-skills/skills/cognitive-doc-design/SKILL.md

cognitive-doc-design

Skill0 starsChanged 39 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Design docs that reduce cognitive load. Trigger: writing guides, READMEs, RFCs, onboarding, architecture, or review-facing docs.

5 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use it especially for:

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Use this default structure unless the repo already provides a stronger template:

    line 34
  3. Distinctive:

    When documenting a PR, reduce reviewer burnout by making the review path explicit:

    line 65
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep each section focused on one decision or unit of work.

    line 70
  5. Distinctive:

    Use checklists for acceptance criteria and verification.

    line 71

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

When to Use

Load this skill when creating or editing documentation that people need to understand quickly, retain, or use during review.

Use it especially for:

  • PR descriptions and review notes.
  • Contributor or maintainer guides.
  • Architecture, workflow, or onboarding docs.
  • Any doc that currently feels long, dense, or hard to scan.

Critical Patterns

PatternRule
Lead with the answerPut the decision, action, or outcome first. Context comes after.
Progressive disclosureStart with the happy path, then add details, edge cases, and references.
ChunkingGroup related information into small sections. Keep flat lists short.
SignpostingUse headings, labels, callouts, and summaries so readers know where they are.
Recognition over recallPrefer tables, checklists, examples, and templates over prose that must be remembered.
Review empathyDesign docs so reviewers can verify intent without reconstructing the whole story.

Documentation Shape

Use this default structure unless the repo already provides a stronger template:

# <Outcome-oriented title>

<One paragraph: what changed, who it helps, and why it matters.>

## Quick path

1. <First action>
2. <Second action>
3. <Verification or expected result>

## Details

| Topic | Decision |
|-------|----------|
| <area> | <concise explanation> |

## Checklist

- [ ] <Reader can confirm this>
- [ ] <Reader can confirm that>

## Next step

<Link or action that continues the workflow.>

PR and Review Docs

When documenting a PR, reduce reviewer burnout by making the review path explicit:

  • State what to review first.
  • State what is intentionally out of scope.
  • Link the previous and next PR when work is chained.
  • Keep each section focused on one decision or unit of work.
  • Use checklists for acceptance criteria and verification.

Commands

# Check markdown files changed in the current branch
git diff --name-only -- '*.md'

# Inspect PR changed-line count for cognitive load
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json additions,deletions,changedFiles

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.