cognitive-doc-design
Skill0 starsChanged 39 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Design docs that reduce cognitive load. Trigger: writing guides, READMEs, RFCs, onboarding, architecture, or review-facing docs.
5 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data
Most recently taken up by
- joeldevz/skynex-pitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- JuankCadavid/akili-specsedited, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- svg153/skillsword for word, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- martinhg/capiko-aitheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- Gentleman-Programming/gentle-aiword for word, first seen Oct 2, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai★ 8.6k100% same
- svg153/skills★ 1100% same
Edited · 1
- JuankCadavid/akili-specs★ 1068% same
Wrote their own version · 2
- joeldevz/skynex-pi★ 2same name
- martinhg/capiko-ai★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- architecture-lintSkill
- architecture-questSkill
- autofixSkill
- branch-prSkill
- chained-prSkill
- comment-writerSkill
- design-patternsSkill
- gentle-uiSkill
- gh-address-commentsSkill
- gh-fix-ciSkill
- github-automationSkill
- github-prSkill
- go-testingSkill
- grillingSkill
- issue-creationSkill
- judgment-daySkill
- playwright-interactiveSkill
- playwrightSkill
- product-questSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-improverSkill
- systemic-issue-triageSkill
- tailwind-4Skill
- test-fixingSkill
- typescriptSkill
- ui-designSkill
- ui-ux-principlesSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- web-searchSkill
- work-unit-commitsSkill
- zod-4Skill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Use it especially for:
- Distinctive: line 34
Use this default structure unless the repo already provides a stronger template:
- Distinctive: line 65
When documenting a PR, reduce reviewer burnout by making the review path explicit:
- Distinctive: line 70
Keep each section focused on one decision or unit of work.
- Distinctive: line 71
Use checklists for acceptance criteria and verification.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
When to Use
Load this skill when creating or editing documentation that people need to understand quickly, retain, or use during review.
Use it especially for:
- PR descriptions and review notes.
- Contributor or maintainer guides.
- Architecture, workflow, or onboarding docs.
- Any doc that currently feels long, dense, or hard to scan.
Critical Patterns
| Pattern | Rule |
| Lead with the answer | Put the decision, action, or outcome first. Context comes after. |
| Progressive disclosure | Start with the happy path, then add details, edge cases, and references. |
| Chunking | Group related information into small sections. Keep flat lists short. |
| Signposting | Use headings, labels, callouts, and summaries so readers know where they are. |
| Recognition over recall | Prefer tables, checklists, examples, and templates over prose that must be remembered. |
| Review empathy | Design docs so reviewers can verify intent without reconstructing the whole story. |
Documentation Shape
Use this default structure unless the repo already provides a stronger template:
# <Outcome-oriented title>
<One paragraph: what changed, who it helps, and why it matters.>
## Quick path
1. <First action>
2. <Second action>
3. <Verification or expected result>
## Details
| Topic | Decision |
|-------|----------|
| <area> | <concise explanation> |
## Checklist
- [ ] <Reader can confirm this>
- [ ] <Reader can confirm that>
## Next step
<Link or action that continues the workflow.>PR and Review Docs
When documenting a PR, reduce reviewer burnout by making the review path explicit:
- State what to review first.
- State what is intentionally out of scope.
- Link the previous and next PR when work is chained.
- Keep each section focused on one decision or unit of work.
- Use checklists for acceptance criteria and verification.
Commands
# Check markdown files changed in the current branch
git diff --name-only -- '*.md'
# Inspect PR changed-line count for cognitive load
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json additions,deletions,changedFilesDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

