agentleFS
AndyTechnologiesAndyTechnologies/my-own-skills/skills/branch-pr/SKILL.md

branch-pr

Skill0 starsChanged 39 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Create Gentle AI pull requests with issue-first checks. Trigger: creating, opening, or preparing PRs for review.

  • Commits and pushes

5 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when:

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Automated checks must pass: before merge is possible

    line 23
  3. Distinctive:

    Check exactly ONE in the template and add the matching label:

    line 83
  4. Distinctive:

    All boxes must be checked:

    line 116
  5. Distinctive:

    Commit messages MUST match this regex:

    line 140

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Creating a pull request for any change
  • Preparing a branch for submission
  • Helping a contributor open a PR

Critical Rules

  1. Every PR MUST link an approved issue — no exceptions
  2. Every PR MUST have exactly one type:* label
  3. Automated checks must pass before merge is possible
  4. Blank PRs without issue linkage will be blocked by GitHub Actions

Workflow

1. Verify issue has `status:approved` label
2. Create branch: type/description (see Branch Naming below)
3. Implement changes with conventional commits
4. Run shellcheck on modified scripts
5. Open PR using the template
6. Add exactly one type:* label
7. Wait for automated checks to pass

Branch Naming

Branch names MUST match this regex:

^(feat|fix|chore|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|revert)\/[a-z0-9._-]+$

Format: type/description — lowercase, no spaces, only a-z0-9._- in description.

TypeBranch patternExample
Featurefeat/<description>feat/user-login
Bug fixfix/<description>fix/zsh-glob-error
Chorechore/<description>chore/update-ci-actions
Docsdocs/<description>docs/installation-guide
Stylestyle/<description>style/format-scripts
Refactorrefactor/<description>refactor/extract-shared-logic
Performanceperf/<description>perf/reduce-startup-time
Testtest/<description>test/add-setup-coverage
Buildbuild/<description>build/update-shellcheck
CIci/<description>ci/add-branch-validation
Revertrevert/<description>revert/broken-setup-change

PR Body Format

The PR template is at .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md. Every PR body MUST contain:

1. Linked Issue (REQUIRED)

Closes #<issue-number>

Valid keywords: Closes #N, Fixes #N, Resolves #N (case insensitive). The linked issue MUST have the status:approved label.

2. PR Type (REQUIRED)

Check exactly ONE in the template and add the matching label:

CheckboxLabel to add
Bug fixtype:bug
New featuretype:feature
Documentation onlytype:docs
Code refactoringtype:refactor
Maintenance/toolingtype:chore
Breaking changetype:breaking-change

3. Summary

1-3 bullet points of what the PR does.

4. Changes Table

| File | Change |
|------|--------|
| `path/to/file` | What changed |

5. Test Plan

- [x] Scripts run without errors: `shellcheck scripts/*.sh`
- [x] Manually tested the affected functionality
- [x] Skills load correctly in target agent

6. Contributor Checklist

All boxes must be checked:

  • Linked an approved issue
  • Added exactly one type:* label
  • Ran shellcheck on modified scripts
  • Skills tested in at least one agent
  • Docs updated if behavior changed
  • Conventional commit format
  • No Co-Authored-By trailers

Automated Checks (all must pass)

CheckJob nameWhat it verifies
PR ValidationCheck Issue ReferenceBody contains Closes/Fixes/Resolves #N
PR ValidationCheck Issue Has status:approvedLinked issue has status:approved
PR ValidationCheck PR Has type:* LabelPR has exactly one type:* label
CIShellcheckShell scripts pass shellcheck

Conventional Commits

Commit messages MUST match this regex:

^(build|chore|ci|docs|feat|fix|perf|refactor|revert|style|test)(\([a-z0-9\._-]+\))?!?: .+

Format: type(scope): description or type: description

  • type — required, one of: build, chore, ci, docs, feat, fix, perf, refactor, revert, style, test
  • (scope) — optional, lowercase with a-z0-9._-
  • ! — optional, indicates breaking change
  • description — required, starts after :

Type-to-label mapping:

Commit typePR label
feattype:feature
fixtype:bug
docstype:docs
refactortype:refactor
choretype:chore
styletype:chore
perftype:feature
testtype:chore
buildtype:chore
citype:chore
reverttype:bug
feat! / fix!type:breaking-change

Examples:

feat(scripts): add Codex support to setup.sh
fix(skills): correct topic key format in sdd-apply
docs(readme): update multi-model configuration guide
refactor(skills): extract shared persistence logic
chore(ci): add shellcheck to PR validation workflow
perf(scripts): reduce setup.sh execution time
style(skills): fix markdown formatting
test(scripts): add setup.sh integration tests
ci(workflows): add branch name validation
revert: undo broken setup change
feat!: redesign skill loading system

Commands

# Create branch
git checkout -b feat/my-feature main

# Run shellcheck before pushing
shellcheck scripts/*.sh

# Push and create PR
git push -u origin feat/my-feature
gh pr create --title "feat(scope): description" --body "Closes #N"

# Add type label to PR
gh pr edit <pr-number> --add-label "type:feature"

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.