branch-pr
Skill0 starsChanged 39 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Create Gentle AI pull requests with issue-first checks. Trigger: creating, opening, or preparing PRs for review.
- Commits and pushes
5 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- joeldevz/skynex-pitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- svg153/skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- martinhg/capiko-aitheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- 0xErwin1/dbfluxtheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- Gentleman-Programming/gentleman-guardian-angeltheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- svg153/skills★ 185% same
Wrote their own version · 4
- Gentleman-Programming/gentleman-guardian-angel★ 1.2ksame name
- 0xErwin1/dbflux★ 526same name
- joeldevz/skynex-pi★ 2same name
- martinhg/capiko-ai★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- architecture-lintSkill
- architecture-questSkill
- autofixSkill
- chained-prSkill
- cognitive-doc-designSkill
- comment-writerSkill
- design-patternsSkill
- gentle-uiSkill
- gh-address-commentsSkill
- gh-fix-ciSkill
- github-automationSkill
- github-prSkill
- go-testingSkill
- grillingSkill
- issue-creationSkill
- judgment-daySkill
- playwright-interactiveSkill
- playwrightSkill
- product-questSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skill-improverSkill
- systemic-issue-triageSkill
- tailwind-4Skill
- test-fixingSkill
- typescriptSkill
- ui-designSkill
- ui-ux-principlesSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- web-searchSkill
- work-unit-commitsSkill
- zod-4Skill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Use this skill when:
- Distinctive: line 23
Automated checks must pass: before merge is possible
- Distinctive: line 83
Check exactly ONE in the template and add the matching label:
- Distinctive: line 116
All boxes must be checked:
- Distinctive: line 140
Commit messages MUST match this regex:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Creating a pull request for any change
- Preparing a branch for submission
- Helping a contributor open a PR
Critical Rules
- Every PR MUST link an approved issue — no exceptions
- Every PR MUST have exactly one
type:*label - Automated checks must pass before merge is possible
- Blank PRs without issue linkage will be blocked by GitHub Actions
Workflow
1. Verify issue has `status:approved` label
2. Create branch: type/description (see Branch Naming below)
3. Implement changes with conventional commits
4. Run shellcheck on modified scripts
5. Open PR using the template
6. Add exactly one type:* label
7. Wait for automated checks to passBranch Naming
Branch names MUST match this regex:
^(feat|fix|chore|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|revert)\/[a-z0-9._-]+$Format: type/description — lowercase, no spaces, only a-z0-9._- in description.
| Type | Branch pattern | Example |
| Feature | feat/<description> | feat/user-login |
| Bug fix | fix/<description> | fix/zsh-glob-error |
| Chore | chore/<description> | chore/update-ci-actions |
| Docs | docs/<description> | docs/installation-guide |
| Style | style/<description> | style/format-scripts |
| Refactor | refactor/<description> | refactor/extract-shared-logic |
| Performance | perf/<description> | perf/reduce-startup-time |
| Test | test/<description> | test/add-setup-coverage |
| Build | build/<description> | build/update-shellcheck |
| CI | ci/<description> | ci/add-branch-validation |
| Revert | revert/<description> | revert/broken-setup-change |
PR Body Format
The PR template is at .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md. Every PR body MUST contain:
1. Linked Issue (REQUIRED)
Closes #<issue-number>Valid keywords: Closes #N, Fixes #N, Resolves #N (case insensitive).
The linked issue MUST have the status:approved label.
2. PR Type (REQUIRED)
Check exactly ONE in the template and add the matching label:
| Checkbox | Label to add |
| Bug fix | type:bug |
| New feature | type:feature |
| Documentation only | type:docs |
| Code refactoring | type:refactor |
| Maintenance/tooling | type:chore |
| Breaking change | type:breaking-change |
3. Summary
1-3 bullet points of what the PR does.
4. Changes Table
| File | Change |
|------|--------|
| `path/to/file` | What changed |5. Test Plan
- [x] Scripts run without errors: `shellcheck scripts/*.sh`
- [x] Manually tested the affected functionality
- [x] Skills load correctly in target agent6. Contributor Checklist
All boxes must be checked:
- Linked an approved issue
- Added exactly one
type:*label - Ran shellcheck on modified scripts
- Skills tested in at least one agent
- Docs updated if behavior changed
- Conventional commit format
- No
Co-Authored-Bytrailers
Automated Checks (all must pass)
| Check | Job name | What it verifies |
| PR Validation | Check Issue Reference | Body contains Closes/Fixes/Resolves #N |
| PR Validation | Check Issue Has status:approved | Linked issue has status:approved |
| PR Validation | Check PR Has type:* Label | PR has exactly one type:* label |
| CI | Shellcheck | Shell scripts pass shellcheck |
Conventional Commits
Commit messages MUST match this regex:
^(build|chore|ci|docs|feat|fix|perf|refactor|revert|style|test)(\([a-z0-9\._-]+\))?!?: .+Format: type(scope): description or type: description
type— required, one of:build,chore,ci,docs,feat,fix,perf,refactor,revert,style,test(scope)— optional, lowercase witha-z0-9._-!— optional, indicates breaking changedescription— required, starts after:
Type-to-label mapping:
| Commit type | PR label |
feat | type:feature |
fix | type:bug |
docs | type:docs |
refactor | type:refactor |
chore | type:chore |
style | type:chore |
perf | type:feature |
test | type:chore |
build | type:chore |
ci | type:chore |
revert | type:bug |
feat! / fix! | type:breaking-change |
Examples:
feat(scripts): add Codex support to setup.sh
fix(skills): correct topic key format in sdd-apply
docs(readme): update multi-model configuration guide
refactor(skills): extract shared persistence logic
chore(ci): add shellcheck to PR validation workflow
perf(scripts): reduce setup.sh execution time
style(skills): fix markdown formatting
test(scripts): add setup.sh integration tests
ci(workflows): add branch name validation
revert: undo broken setup change
feat!: redesign skill loading systemCommands
# Create branch
git checkout -b feat/my-feature main
# Run shellcheck before pushing
shellcheck scripts/*.sh
# Push and create PR
git push -u origin feat/my-feature
gh pr create --title "feat(scope): description" --body "Closes #N"
# Add type label to PR
gh pr edit <pr-number> --add-label "type:feature"Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

