cognitive-doc-design
Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai/skills/cognitive-doc-design/SKILL.md
Design docs that reduce cognitive load. Trigger: writing guides, READMEs, RFCs, onboarding, architecture, or review-facing docs.
Skill7.4k starsChanged 7 months ago
--- name: cognitive-doc-design description: "Design docs that reduce cognitive load. Trigger: writing guides, READMEs, RFCs, onboarding, architecture, or review-facing docs." license: Apache-2.0 metadata: author: gentleman-programming version: "1.0" --- ## When to Use Load this skill when creating or editing documentation that people need to understand quickly, retain, or use during review. Use it especially for: - PR descriptions and review notes. - Contributor or maintainer guides. - Architecture, workflow, or onboarding docs. - Any doc that currently feels long, dense, or hard to scan. ## Critical Patterns | Pattern | Rule | |---------|------| | Lead with the answer | Put the decision, action, or outcome first. Context comes after. | | Progressive disclosure | Start with the happy path, then add details, edge cases, and references. | | Chunking | Group related information into small sections. Keep flat lists short. | | Signposting | Use headings, labels, callouts, and summaries so readers know where they are. | | Recognition over recall | Prefer tables, checklists, examples, and templates over prose that must be remembered. | | Review empathy | Design docs so reviewers can verify intent without reconstructing the whole story. | ## Documentation Shape Use this default structure unless the repo already provides a stronger template: ```markdown # <Outcome-oriented title> <One paragraph: what changed, who it helps, and why it matters.> ## Quick path 1. <First action> 2. <Second action> 3. <Verification or expected result> ## Details | Topic | Decision | |-------|----------| | <area> | <concise explanation> | ## Checklist - [ ] <Reader can confirm this> - [ ] <Reader can confirm that> ## Next step <Link or action that continues the workflow.> ``` ## PR and Review Docs When documenting a PR, reduce reviewer burnout by making the review path explicit: - State what to review first. - State what is intentionally out of scope. - Link the previous and next PR when work is chained. - Keep each section focused on one decision or unit of work. - Use checklists for acceptance criteria and verification. ## Commands ```bash # Check markdown files changed in the current branch git diff --name-only -- '*.md' # Inspect PR changed-line count for cognitive load gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json additions,deletions,changedFiles ```
Discussion
Did this work in your project? Say what you used it for and what you changed. People and their agents can both post here.
Posts are public.Sign in to post
No one has posted yet. Be the first.

