agentleFS
Andamio-PlatformAndamio-Platform/coach/skills/gather-code-examples/SKILL.md

gather-code-examples

Skill6 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Generate code example checklists for Developer Documentation lessons based on readiness assessment.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    After /self-assess-readiness identifies Developer Documentation SLTs as "Needs Context"

    line 18
  2. Distinctive:

    When the Context Shopping List includes code examples or API references

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    Before building Developer Documentation lessons

    line 20
  4. Very specific:

    If no course specified, scan courses-in-progress/ and ask which course to generate checklist for.

    line 33
  5. Very specific:

    Read 04-readiness-assessment.md to identify:

    line 37
  6. Very specific:

    Read 00-course.md to get:

    line 45
  7. Very specific:

    Ensure assets/code-examples/ directory exists:

    line 125
  8. Distinctive:

    Every code example must:

    line 191

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Skill: Gather Code Examples

Description

Generates a structured code example checklist from a course's readiness assessment. Used during Phase 6 (Gather Context) of the course workflow to prepare assets for Developer Documentation lessons.

When to Use

  • After /self-assess-readiness identifies Developer Documentation SLTs as "Needs Context"
  • When the Context Shopping List includes code examples or API references
  • Before building Developer Documentation lessons

Invocation

/gather-code-examples                           # Interactive: asks which course
/gather-code-examples andamio-for-api-developers  # Specify course

Instructions

1. Identify Course

If no course specified, scan courses-in-progress/ and ask which course to generate checklist for.

2. Read Readiness Assessment

Read 04-readiness-assessment.md to identify:

  • Which SLTs are "Needs Context" or "Needs Human"
  • Which of those are Developer Documentation lesson type (cross-reference with 03-lesson-type-classification.md)
  • What specific code examples are needed (from Gap Analysis sections)
  • What API references or docs are needed

3. Read Course Outline

Read 00-course.md to get:

  • Lesson focus for each SLT (what code patterns to demonstrate)
  • Lesson inputs specified (what examples were already anticipated)
  • Any specific libraries, frameworks, or APIs mentioned

4. Generate Checklist

Create assets/code-examples/README.md with:

# Code Example Checklist: [Course Name]

**Generated from:** `04-readiness-assessment.md`
**Primary language:** [language]
**Key libraries:** [list]
**Last updated:** [date]

## Environment Requirements

- **Language version:** [e.g., Go 1.21+, Node 18+]
- **Required packages:** [list with versions if known]
- **Test environment:** [e.g., Cardano preprod, local devnet]

## Naming Convention

[slt-number]-[example-name].[ext]


## Checklist

### SLT [X.Y]: [SLT text]

| # | Filename | What to Demonstrate | Status |
|---|----------|---------------------|--------|
| 1 | `X.Y-example-name.go` | [specific code pattern] | [ ] |

**Code requirements:**
- [ ] Compiles without errors
- [ ] Runs against [test environment]
- [ ] Includes comments explaining key steps
- [ ] Error handling demonstrated

**API references needed:**
- [ ] [specific API doc or function signature]

**Verification:**
- [ ] Output matches expected result
- [ ] Tested on [date] against [environment]

---

[Repeat for each Developer Documentation SLT]

## Summary

| SLT | Examples Needed | Verified | Notes |
|-----|-----------------|----------|-------|
| X.Y | [count] | 0 | [brief note] |

**Total:** [n] code examples

## API Documentation Links

| Library | Doc URL | Version | Status |
|---------|---------|---------|--------|
| [name] | [url] | [version] | [ ] Verified current |

## Gathering Session Notes

_Use this space to record observations:_

- Date:
- Tester:
- Environment version:
- Issues encountered:

5. Create Directory Structure

Ensure assets/code-examples/ directory exists:

courses-in-progress/[course-slug]/
  assets/
    code-examples/
      README.md           # The checklist
      1.2-api-auth.ts     # Example files
      2.1-query-courses.ts
      ...

6. Output Summary

After generating, report:

## Code Example Checklist Generated

**Course:** [name]
**Location:** `assets/code-examples/README.md`

| SLT | Example | Language | Dependencies |
|-----|---------|----------|--------------|
| X.Y | [name] | [lang] | [libs] |

**Total:** [n] examples across [m] SLTs

### Dependency Tiers

| Tier | SLTs | What's Needed | Est. Effort |
|------|------|---------------|-------------|
| 1: Standalone | [list] | Language + standard lib only | Low |
| 2: External API | [list] | API key + network access | Medium |
| 3: On-chain | [list] | Test wallet + test ADA | Higher |

**Next step:** Verify API docs are current, then write Tier 1 examples.

Naming Convention

Format

[slt]-[example-name].[ext]

Parts

PartFormatExamplePurpose
sltX.Y1.2SLT number
example-namekebab-caseapi-authWhat the example demonstrates
extlanguage extension.ts, .go, .pyFile type

Examples

FilenameDescription
1.2-api-auth.tsAuthentication example
2.1-query-courses.tsQuerying course data
3.1-build-transaction.goBuilding unsigned transaction
3.2-sign-submit.goSigning and submitting

Code Quality Requirements

Every code example must:

1. Compile/Run

  • No syntax errors
  • All imports resolve
  • Runs without runtime errors (on valid input)

2. Be Complete

  • Self-contained (can copy-paste and run)
  • Includes necessary imports
  • Shows setup and teardown if needed

3. Be Documented

  • Comments explain "why" not just "what"
  • Key steps are labeled
  • Expected output is shown (in comments or separate file)

4. Handle Errors

  • Shows error handling pattern
  • Doesn't silently fail
  • Demonstrates realistic error cases

5. Be Verified

  • Tested against stated environment
  • Output captured and compared
  • Date of last verification recorded

Verification Template

For each example, record:

### Verification: [filename]

- **Tested:** [date]
- **Environment:** [language version, library versions]
- **Test network:** [preprod/mainnet/local]
- **Result:** Pass / Fail
- **Output:**

[actual output]

- **Notes:** [any observations]

Common Example Types

TypePurposeTemplate Pattern
AuthAuthenticate with APISetup credentials → make auth call → store token
QueryFetch dataAuth → build query → handle response → parse data
TransactionBuild/submit txAuth → build unsigned → sign → submit → confirm
CRUDCreate/Read/Update/DeleteAuth → operation → verify result
WebhookHandle callbacksSetup server → register webhook → handle event

Guidelines

  • One checklist per course — Don't split across files
  • Working code only — Never include code that doesn't run
  • Version pin dependencies — Record exact versions tested
  • Test before lesson — Verify examples work before writing lesson content
  • Update on API changes — Re-verify when libraries update
  • Flat directory — No subdirectories per SLT (simpler for organization)
  • Include expected output — Either in comments or companion .output file

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.