gather-code-examples
Skill6 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate code example checklists for Developer Documentation lessons based on readiness assessment.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- andamio-cliSkill
- apprenticeSkill
- assess-sltsSkill
- beginnerSkill
- classify-lesson-typesSkill
- compileSkill
- compoundSkill
- course-workflowSkill
- draft-sltsSkill
- gather-screenshotsSkill
- releaseSkill
- self-assess-readinessSkill
- startSkill
- teacherSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
After /self-assess-readiness identifies Developer Documentation SLTs as "Needs Context"
- Distinctive: line 19
When the Context Shopping List includes code examples or API references
- Distinctive: line 20
Before building Developer Documentation lessons
- Very specific: line 33
If no course specified, scan courses-in-progress/ and ask which course to generate checklist for.
- Very specific: line 37
Read 04-readiness-assessment.md to identify:
- Very specific: line 45
Read 00-course.md to get:
- Very specific: line 125
Ensure assets/code-examples/ directory exists:
- Distinctive: line 191
Every code example must:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Skill: Gather Code Examples
Description
Generates a structured code example checklist from a course's readiness assessment. Used during Phase 6 (Gather Context) of the course workflow to prepare assets for Developer Documentation lessons.
When to Use
- After
/self-assess-readinessidentifies Developer Documentation SLTs as "Needs Context" - When the Context Shopping List includes code examples or API references
- Before building Developer Documentation lessons
Invocation
/gather-code-examples # Interactive: asks which course
/gather-code-examples andamio-for-api-developers # Specify courseInstructions
1. Identify Course
If no course specified, scan courses-in-progress/ and ask which course to generate checklist for.
2. Read Readiness Assessment
Read 04-readiness-assessment.md to identify:
- Which SLTs are "Needs Context" or "Needs Human"
- Which of those are Developer Documentation lesson type (cross-reference with
03-lesson-type-classification.md) - What specific code examples are needed (from Gap Analysis sections)
- What API references or docs are needed
3. Read Course Outline
Read 00-course.md to get:
- Lesson focus for each SLT (what code patterns to demonstrate)
- Lesson inputs specified (what examples were already anticipated)
- Any specific libraries, frameworks, or APIs mentioned
4. Generate Checklist
Create assets/code-examples/README.md with:
# Code Example Checklist: [Course Name]
**Generated from:** `04-readiness-assessment.md`
**Primary language:** [language]
**Key libraries:** [list]
**Last updated:** [date]
## Environment Requirements
- **Language version:** [e.g., Go 1.21+, Node 18+]
- **Required packages:** [list with versions if known]
- **Test environment:** [e.g., Cardano preprod, local devnet]
## Naming Convention
[slt-number]-[example-name].[ext]
## Checklist
### SLT [X.Y]: [SLT text]
| # | Filename | What to Demonstrate | Status |
|---|----------|---------------------|--------|
| 1 | `X.Y-example-name.go` | [specific code pattern] | [ ] |
**Code requirements:**
- [ ] Compiles without errors
- [ ] Runs against [test environment]
- [ ] Includes comments explaining key steps
- [ ] Error handling demonstrated
**API references needed:**
- [ ] [specific API doc or function signature]
**Verification:**
- [ ] Output matches expected result
- [ ] Tested on [date] against [environment]
---
[Repeat for each Developer Documentation SLT]
## Summary
| SLT | Examples Needed | Verified | Notes |
|-----|-----------------|----------|-------|
| X.Y | [count] | 0 | [brief note] |
**Total:** [n] code examples
## API Documentation Links
| Library | Doc URL | Version | Status |
|---------|---------|---------|--------|
| [name] | [url] | [version] | [ ] Verified current |
## Gathering Session Notes
_Use this space to record observations:_
- Date:
- Tester:
- Environment version:
- Issues encountered:5. Create Directory Structure
Ensure assets/code-examples/ directory exists:
courses-in-progress/[course-slug]/
assets/
code-examples/
README.md # The checklist
1.2-api-auth.ts # Example files
2.1-query-courses.ts
...6. Output Summary
After generating, report:
## Code Example Checklist Generated
**Course:** [name]
**Location:** `assets/code-examples/README.md`
| SLT | Example | Language | Dependencies |
|-----|---------|----------|--------------|
| X.Y | [name] | [lang] | [libs] |
**Total:** [n] examples across [m] SLTs
### Dependency Tiers
| Tier | SLTs | What's Needed | Est. Effort |
|------|------|---------------|-------------|
| 1: Standalone | [list] | Language + standard lib only | Low |
| 2: External API | [list] | API key + network access | Medium |
| 3: On-chain | [list] | Test wallet + test ADA | Higher |
**Next step:** Verify API docs are current, then write Tier 1 examples.Naming Convention
Format
[slt]-[example-name].[ext]Parts
| Part | Format | Example | Purpose |
slt | X.Y | 1.2 | SLT number |
example-name | kebab-case | api-auth | What the example demonstrates |
ext | language extension | .ts, .go, .py | File type |
Examples
| Filename | Description |
1.2-api-auth.ts | Authentication example |
2.1-query-courses.ts | Querying course data |
3.1-build-transaction.go | Building unsigned transaction |
3.2-sign-submit.go | Signing and submitting |
Code Quality Requirements
Every code example must:
1. Compile/Run
- No syntax errors
- All imports resolve
- Runs without runtime errors (on valid input)
2. Be Complete
- Self-contained (can copy-paste and run)
- Includes necessary imports
- Shows setup and teardown if needed
3. Be Documented
- Comments explain "why" not just "what"
- Key steps are labeled
- Expected output is shown (in comments or separate file)
4. Handle Errors
- Shows error handling pattern
- Doesn't silently fail
- Demonstrates realistic error cases
5. Be Verified
- Tested against stated environment
- Output captured and compared
- Date of last verification recorded
Verification Template
For each example, record:
### Verification: [filename]
- **Tested:** [date]
- **Environment:** [language version, library versions]
- **Test network:** [preprod/mainnet/local]
- **Result:** Pass / Fail
- **Output:**[actual output]
- **Notes:** [any observations]Common Example Types
| Type | Purpose | Template Pattern |
| Auth | Authenticate with API | Setup credentials → make auth call → store token |
| Query | Fetch data | Auth → build query → handle response → parse data |
| Transaction | Build/submit tx | Auth → build unsigned → sign → submit → confirm |
| CRUD | Create/Read/Update/Delete | Auth → operation → verify result |
| Webhook | Handle callbacks | Setup server → register webhook → handle event |
Guidelines
- One checklist per course — Don't split across files
- Working code only — Never include code that doesn't run
- Version pin dependencies — Record exact versions tested
- Test before lesson — Verify examples work before writing lesson content
- Update on API changes — Re-verify when libraries update
- Flat directory — No subdirectories per SLT (simpler for organization)
- Include expected output — Either in comments or companion
.outputfile
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

