ame / rules
Cursor rule1 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
UI copy conventions — no default subtitles or helper text under headings, labels, cards, or settings
We split this sim-ui-copy.mdc into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 28
If a heading needs a subtitle to be understood, the heading is wrong.
- Distinctive: line 32
Keep (or add) a description only when it carries information the label cannot, and its absence would cause a mistake:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,350 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
--- description: UI copy conventions — no default subtitles or helper text under headings, labels, cards, or settings globs: ["apps/sim/**/*.tsx"] --- # UI Copy **Do not add subtitles, helper text, or descriptive copy beneath headings, labels, cards, or settings by default.** Prefer one concise, self-explanatory heading or label. Only add supporting copy when the user explicitly asks for it, or when it is necessary to prevent misunderstanding or error — and never use it to restate the heading. This applies to product surfaces: settings rows, modals, panels, cards, list rows, empty states, form fields, and section headers. Marketing surfaces (`app/(landing)`, docs) are governed by `constitution.mdc` instead. **Carve-out — settings section metadata.** `SettingsNavigationItem.description` in `components/settings/navigation.ts` stays required, and `SettingsPanel` keeps rendering it as the page subtitle. Settings sections are reached through a nav list where the description is the only thing distinguishing adjacent sections. Everything else on a settings page — inline `<p>` blurbs under section headings, field hints, modal bodies, row subtitles — follows the default rule above. ## The default is no description ```tsx // ✗ Bad — the subtitle restates the heading <h3>API Keys</h3> <p className='text-[var(--text-muted)] text-caption'>Manage your API keys.</p> // ✗ Bad — decorative filler under a field label <ChipModalField title='Workspace name' hint='The name of your workspace.' /> // ✓ Good — the label carries the whole meaning <h3>API Keys</h3> <ChipModalField title='Workspace name' /> ``` If a heading needs a subtitle to be understood, the heading is wrong. Fix the heading — don't append a second line. ## When supporting copy earns its place Keep (or add) a description only when it carries information the label cannot, and its absence would cause a mistake: - **Irreversible or destructive consequences** — "Deleting this workspace removes every workflow and log. This cannot be undone." - **A non-obvious format, unit, or bound** — "Comma-separated. Max 50 domains.", "Cost per 1M input tokens." - **A security or access implication** — "This key is shown once and grants full workspace access." - **A state the user cannot otherwise see** — "Inherited from your organization's policy." - **Instructional copy that advances a flow** — "We sent a 6-digit code to you@example.com." Everything else — restatements, "Manage your X", "Configure your Y", feature blurbs, encouragement — gets deleted. ## Component APIs Description/hint slots on shared components are **optional**, never required, and must reserve no layout space when omitted. A component that forces every consumer to supply a subtitle forces every consumer to violate this rule. When adding a new shared component, ship it without a description slot and add one only once a real caller meets the bar above.
Where files are headingNew Cursor rule files have more rules about planning and tracking tasks, and fewer about code style.
Of the Cursor rule files we read, the 3,978 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository54 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/constitution.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/emcn-components.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/global.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/landing-seo-geo.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sim-architecture.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sim-components.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sim-hooks.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sim-imports.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sim-integrations.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sim-queries.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sim-sandbox.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sim-stores.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sim-styling.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sim-testing.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/sim-typescript.mdcCursor rule
- add-block-previewSkill
- add-blockSkill
- add-column-typeSkill
- add-connectorSkill
- add-enrichmentSkill
- add-feature-flagSkill
- add-hosted-keySkill
- add-integrationSkill
- add-managed-cliSkill
- add-modelSkill
- add-toolsSkill
- add-triggerSkill
- babysitSkill
- cleanupSkill
- councilSkill
- db-migrateSkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- emcn-design-reviewSkill
- emil-design-engSkill
- make-interfaces-feel-betterSkill
- memory-load-checkSkill
- migrate-application-operationSkill
- react-query-best-practicesSkill
- shipSkill
- tool-registry-boundarySkill
- v2-api-conventionsSkill
- validate-connectorSkill
- validate-integrationSkill
- validate-modelSkill
- validate-triggerSkill
- you-might-not-need-a-callbackSkill
- you-might-not-need-a-commentSkill
- you-might-not-need-a-memoSkill
- you-might-not-need-an-effectSkill
- you-might-not-need-stateSkill
- you-might-not-need-url-stateSkill
- add-settings-pageSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

