agentleFS
Ame-AlAme-Al/ame/.cursor/rules/sim-integrations.mdc

ame / rules

Cursor rule1 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Adding new integrations (tools, blocks, triggers)

Files
sim-integrations.mdc
---
description: Adding new integrations (tools, blocks, triggers)
globs: ["apps/sim/tools/**", "apps/sim/blocks/**", "apps/sim/triggers/**"]
---
# Adding Integrations

Build order: **Tools** (`tools/{service}/`) → **Block** (`blocks/blocks/{service}.ts`) → **Icon** (`components/icons.tsx`) → optional **Trigger** (`triggers/{service}/`). Always look up the service's API docs first.

The full authoring instructions — tool/block/icon/trigger scaffolding, SubBlock property tables, `condition`/`required`/`dependsOn`/`mode`/`canonicalParamId` syntax, the `normalizeFileInput`/file-handling helper table, and checklists — live in the skills: `/add-integration` (end-to-end), `/add-tools`, `/add-block`, `/add-trigger`.

## Hard rules (don't get these wrong)

- Tool IDs are `snake_case` (`service_action`). Register tools in `tools/registry.ts`, blocks in `blocks/registry-maps.ts` (the `BLOCK_REGISTRY` config map + `BLOCK_META_REGISTRY` catalog-meta map, alphabetically — `blocks/registry.ts` holds only the accessor functions), triggers in `triggers/registry.ts`.
- Type coercions (`Number()`, etc.) belong in `tools.config.params` (runs at execution, after variable resolution) — never in `tools.config.tool` (runs at serialization; coercing there destroys dynamic `<Block.output>` references).
- `canonicalParamId` must NOT match any subblock's `id`, must be unique per operation/condition context, and all subblocks in a canonical group must share the same `required` status. The `inputs` section and the params function reference canonical IDs, not raw subblock IDs.
- Blocks must also set the catalog/UI metadata fields `integrationType`, `tags`, `authMode`, `docsLink`, and export a `{Service}BlockMeta` — see the `/add-block` skill's BlockMeta section for details.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.