agentleFS
AlpacaLabsLLCAlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects/skills/schedule-quantity-reconcile/SKILL.md

schedule-quantity-reconcile

Skill390 starsChanged 54 days agoMITView on GitHub

Compare scoped quantity snapshots and explain matches, missing rows and conflicts. Use to reconcile drawing, report or schedule counts; not to extract source documents or update adopted records.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Before acting, read the host contract and declaration (skill:schedule-quantity-reconcile), using its profiles from the catalog.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Use the host adapter and available native tools or ordinary task-specific code.

    line 17
  3. Very specific:

    Read both actual inputs and preserve hashes/locators.

    line 23
  4. Very specific:

    Read native evidence procedures.

    line 26

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/as:schedule-quantity-reconcile — Reconcile sourced quantities

Before acting, read the host contract and declaration (skill:schedule-quantity-reconcile), using its profiles from the catalog. No source or write access is implied.

<!-- architecture-studio:harness-compatibility -->

Use the host adapter and available native tools or ordinary task-specific code. Operation names identify semantic procedures, not installed functions. No Arch Studio runner, package installation or executable reconstruction is required. Existing exact authorization persists; ask only for material missing information or permission.

Input: two source-identified quantity snapshots and explicit building/floor/phase/revision scope. Output: a read-only comparison, not an authoritative merged schedule. Project instructions apply when bound to a project; one-off comparison does not initialize or adopt records.

  1. Read both actual inputs and preserve hashes/locators. Drawing extraction belongs to /as:drawing-quantity-extract. Do not compare a whole-campus inventory against one floor as though their denominators match. Missing scope or unit evidence remains unresolved.
  2. Read native evidence procedures. Prepare exact tag/scope/unit keys and preserve every contributing source row. Explicitly resolve aliases or unit conversions using source evidence before comparison; no fuzzy match or automatic phase/room synonym.
  3. Apply schedule_reconcile.compare with native computation under its evidence procedure. Duplicate keys require explicit aggregation or conflict resolution first. Unknown is null, not zero; absent rows are not zero. Matching supplied values proves agreement, not correctness or completeness. Lighting reports first use /as:lighting-report-extract to distinguish inventory from calculation surfaces. Never sum repeated room inventory to remove duplicate keys. Before projecting normalized groups to tag/scope/unit, explicitly select matching source revisions, rooms, scenes and variants on both sides, or preserve those distinctions in the agreed comparison scope. Keep every contributing locator; do not flatten unresolved/conflicting identity into an authoritative quantity. The comparison rejects duplicate comparison keys; it does not choose or merge lighting inventories.
  4. Explain each discrepancy with locators on both sides and source coverage. A revision note can explain a split but does not authorize changing labels or records. Preserve competing values; distinguish a proposed correction from an approved one. Product identity/spec discrepancies route to /as:product-audit; do not enlarge this skill into a general product audit.
  5. Return matched, conflicting, missing and unknown groups. Save only an authorized derived report and read it back; do not change original files. Adopted changes go to /as:master-schedule with explicit selected changes and expected revisions. Missing host capability yields a bounded handoff, not a fabricated match or silent fallback. On retry, reread input hashes before reusing results.

Current document placement

Save only authorized derived outputs and verify their actual content, source hashes and complete requested scope. Inline answers and one-off files need no project setup or adoption. For a requested registered project report, resolve confirmed coordinates using the receive-owned native documents.resolve/register semantics in the workspace model, including its complete document/register mutation sequence. Find existing records with documents.query; never guess a folder. This conditional handoff does not authorize schedule or library changes.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.