agentleFS
AlpacaLabsLLCAlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects/skills/lighting-report-extract/SKILL.md

lighting-report-extract

Skill390 starsChanged 54 days agoMITView on GitHub

Check reported lighting quantities and results in supplied simulation PDFs without adding repeated calculation surfaces. Use for scoped luminaire inventories and illuminance results; not simulation or compliance.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Before acting, read the host contract and declaration (skill:lighting-report-extract), using its profiles from the catalog.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Use the host adapter and available native tools or ordinary task-specific code.

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    Read exact source bytes through the host.

    line 25
  4. Distinctive:

    Read PDF evidence contracts.

    line 27
  5. Distinctive:

    Keep the report's room/surface labels.

    line 36
  6. Distinctive:

    When quantities are requested, read the lighting observation contract and schema.

    line 39
  7. Very specific:

    Keep room, scene, variant and source version separate.

    line 43

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/as:lighting-report-extract — Extract reported lighting results

Before acting, read the host contract and declaration (skill:lighting-report-extract), using its profiles from the catalog. Host access must be demonstrated, not inferred.

<!-- architecture-studio:harness-compatibility -->

Use the host adapter and available native tools or ordinary task-specific code. Operation names identify semantic procedures, not installed functions. No Arch Studio runner, package installation or executable reconstruction is required. Existing exact authorization persists; ask only for material missing information or permission.

Input: supplied report PDF(s), requested rooms/surfaces, metrics and inventory scope. Output: separately sourced inventory observations and calculation results with a coverage ledger. No simulation, design adequacy determination or regulatory target is produced. One-off extraction requires no studio initialization or schedule adoption.

  1. Read exact source bytes through the host; retain hash/revision. Read owning project instructions when applicable. If access is missing, request an exposed native grant or give the precise handoff.
  2. Read PDF evidence contracts. Inventory every physical page separately from printed labels. Search actual text and inspect table images using host PDF/OCR capabilities. A TOC referring beyond the physical page count can reflect an excerpt with original pagination; it does not prove that results are absent. Check summary and individual calculation-surface tables before marking a requested metric unavailable.
  3. Extract exact room/surface name, metric label, value, unit, calculation condition/height where reported, document hash, physical page, printed page and table/region locator. Keep average, minimum, uniformity, glare and daylight metrics distinct. Preserve reported decimal notation and unknown units; no target values or compliance conclusions may be supplied from memory.
  4. Keep the report's room/surface labels. A mezzanine is not a named laboratory without explicit mapping evidence. Separate multiple surfaces and scenarios; never select the most favorable value or merge them silently. Inspect requested values against rendered tables and retain conflicts.
  5. When quantities are requested, read the lighting observation contract and schema. A room's luminaire inventory repeated under two calculation surfaces is one inventory, not two additive counts. Establish inventory identity from the report's room/list/scope evidence; matching quantities or labels alone cannot establish it. Keep room, scene, variant and source version separate; unknown identity remains unresolved. A report without a scene label uses not-reported, never an invented scenario. Apply lighting_report.build to the explicitly prepared observations using native computation and the complete grouping rules. The normalized result describes supplied identities; it does not establish source verification.
  6. Return extracted metrics plus per-request status: observed, unresolved association, unparsed or not located after inspection. Preserve inspected page coverage and OCR limitations. Only claim absence within the supplied and inspected pages, not the full originating report. Save requested derived outputs and read them back; do not edit simulation files or adopted schedules. Luminaire product specifications belong to /as:product-spec-pdf-parser; plan counts to /as:drawing-quantity-extract. Compliance assessment is outside this skill's scope. Requested quantity comparison goes to /as:schedule-quantity-reconcile with all locators and unresolved/conflicting groups retained; extraction does not authorize schedule adoption.

Current document placement

Save only authorized derived outputs and verify their actual content, source hashes and complete requested scope. Inline answers and one-off files need no project setup or adoption. For a requested registered project report, resolve confirmed coordinates using the receive-owned native documents.resolve/register semantics in the workspace model, including its complete document/register mutation sequence. Find existing records with documents.query; never guess a folder. This conditional handoff does not authorize schedule or library changes.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.