agentleFS
AlekseiULAlekseiUL/heisenberg-team/skills/n8n-workflow-automation/SKILL.md

n8n-workflow-automation

Skill17 starsChanged 19 days agoMITView on GitHub

Designs and outputs n8n workflow JSON with robust triggers, idempotency, error handling, logging, retries, and human-in-the-loop review queues. Use when you need an auditable automation that won’t silently fail.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

15 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈14

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Add error handling and retries to this workflow, plus a review queue for failures.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Create a webhook workflow that logs every run and writes a status row to a tracker.

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    DO NOT USE WHEN…

    line 18
  4. Distinctive:

    Default (read-only): a workflow design spec (nodes, data contracts, failure modes).

    line 36
  5. Very specific:

    If explicitly requested: workflow.json (n8n importable JSON) + runbook.md (from template).

    line 37
  6. Distinctive:

    Add human-in-the-loop (HITL) review queue:

    line 52
  7. Distinctive:

    write failed items to a queue (Sheet/DB) and require approval to reprocess.

    line 53
  8. Distinctive:

    if counts/thresholds fail, stop workflow and alert.

    line 55
  9. Distinctive:

    If asked for JSON: produce importable n8n workflow JSON + runbook.

    line 57
  10. Distinctive:

    STOP AND ASK THE USER if:

    line 58
  11. Distinctive:

    no dedup key exists,

    line 60
  12. Distinctive:

    If outputting n8n workflow JSON, conform to:

    line 66
  13. Distinctive:

    Read-only by default; only emit workflow JSON when explicitly requested.

    line 82
  14. Distinctive:

    Do not include secrets in JSON.

    line 83
  15. Distinctive:

    Prefer least privilege: call only required APIs and minimize scopes.

    line 85

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

n8n workflow automation with retries, logging, and review queues

PURPOSE

Designs and outputs n8n workflow JSON with robust triggers, idempotency, error handling, logging, retries, and human-in-the-loop review queues.

WHEN TO USE

  • TRIGGERS:
    • Build an n8n workflow that runs every Monday and emails the compliance summary.
    • Add error handling and retries to this workflow, plus a review queue for failures.
    • Create a webhook workflow that logs every run and writes a status row to a tracker.
    • Make this n8n flow idempotent so it does not duplicate records when it reruns.
    • Instrument this workflow with audit logs and a human approval step.
  • DO NOT USE WHEN…
    • You need code-only automation without n8n (use a scripting/CI skill).
    • You need to bypass security controls or hide audit trails.
    • You need to purchase or recommend prohibited items/services.

INPUTS

  • REQUIRED:
    • Workflow intent: trigger type + schedule/timezone + success criteria.
    • Targets: where to write results (email/Drive/Sheet/DB) and required fields.
  • OPTIONAL:
    • Existing n8n workflow JSON to modify.
    • Sample payloads / example records.
    • Definition of dedup keys (what makes a record unique).
  • EXAMPLES:
    • Cron: Monday 08:00 Europe/London; send summary email + Drive upload
    • Webhook: receive JSON; route to folders

OUTPUTS

  • Default (read-only): a workflow design spec (nodes, data contracts, failure modes).
  • If explicitly requested: workflow.json (n8n importable JSON) + runbook.md (from template). Success = workflow is idempotent, logs every run, retries safely, and routes failures to a review queue.

WORKFLOW

  1. Clarify trigger:
    • Cron/webhook/manual; schedule/timezone; concurrency expectations.
  2. Define data contract:
    • input schema, required fields, and validation rules.
  3. Design idempotency:
    • choose dedup key(s) and storage (DB/Sheet) to prevent duplicates on retries.
  4. Add observability:
    • generate run_id, log start/end, store status row and error details.
  5. Implement error handling:
    • per-node error branches, retry with backoff, and final failure notification.
  6. Add human-in-the-loop (HITL) review queue:
    • write failed items to a queue (Sheet/DB) and require approval to reprocess.
  7. “No silent failure” gates:
    • if counts/thresholds fail, stop workflow and alert.
  8. Output:
    • If asked for JSON: produce importable n8n workflow JSON + runbook.
  9. STOP AND ASK THE USER if:
    • destination systems are unknown,
    • no dedup key exists,
    • credential strategy (env vars) is not specified,
    • the workflow needs privileged access not yet approved.

OUTPUT FORMAT

If outputting n8n workflow JSON, conform to:

{
  "name": "<workflow name>",
  "nodes": [ { "name": "Trigger", "type": "n8n-nodes-base.cron", "parameters": {}, "position": [0,0] } ],
  "connections": {},
  "settings": {},
  "active": false
}

Also output runbook.md using assets/runbook-template.md.

SAFETY & EDGE CASES

  • Read-only by default; only emit workflow JSON when explicitly requested.
  • Do not include secrets in JSON; reference env vars/credential names only.
  • Include audit logging + failure notifications; avoid workflows that can silently drop data.
  • Prefer least privilege: call only required APIs and minimize scopes.

EXAMPLES

  • Input: “Cron every Monday, email compliance summary, retry failures.”
    Output: Node map + workflow.json with Cron → Fetch → Aggregate → Email, plus error branches to review queue.
  • Input: “Webhook that logs runs and writes status row.”
    Output: Webhook → Validate → Process → Append status row; on error → log + notify + queue.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.