find-bugs
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Find bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues in local branch changes. Use when asked to review changes, find bugs, security review, or audit code on the current branch.
15 other projects use a version of this, 9 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- robinbril/claude-code-harnessedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- LikeMindsCommunity/agentic-workflow-backendtheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- aantoniadis/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- xfstudio/skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- salesforce/cloudsplainingedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- saadeghi/daisyuitheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use gcp-cloud-run, conversation-memory and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
xfstudioSkillgcp-cloud-run
Specialized skill for building production-ready serverless applications on GCP. Covers Cloud Run services (containerized), Cloud Run Functions (event-driven), cold start optimization, and event-driven architecture with Pub/Sub.
Also in 3 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillconversation-memory
Persistent memory systems for LLM conversations including short-term, long-term, and entity-based memory Use when: conversation memory, remember, memory persistence, long-term memory, chat history.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkilliterate-pr
Iterate on a PR until actionable CI passes and high/medium review feedback is addressed. Use for PR CI failures, review feedback, or green-check loops; do not wait for human approval, draft status, or merge gates.
Also in 3 projects that use this
xenitV1Skillpowershell-windows
PowerShell Windows patterns. Critical pitfalls, operator syntax, error handling.
Also in 3 projects that use this
abdullah1854Skillcontext-optimization
Also in 3 projects that use this
silvainfmSkillpage-cro
When the user wants to optimize, improve, or increase conversions on any marketing page — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, or blog posts. Also use when the user says "CRO," "conversion rate optimization," "this page isn't converting," "improve conversions," or "why isn't this page working." For signup/registration flows, see signup-flow-cro. For post-signup activation, see onboarding-cro. For forms outside of signup, see form-cro. For popups/modals, see popup-cro.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions15 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 9
- salesforce/cloudsplaining★ 2.3k98% same
- getsentry/sentry-python★ 2.2k98% same
- getsentry/skills★ 1.1k98% same
- roman01la/skills-agents★ 4898% same
- Fandry96/k3-agentic-skills★ 2786% same
- xfstudio/skills★ 987% same
- robinbril/claude-code-harness★ 398% same
- ai4brands-design/claude-skills★ 287% same
- StillScripts/cursor-agents-manager★ 198% same
Wrote their own version · 6
- saadeghi/daisyui★ 43ksame name
- valpere/session-indexer★ 42same name
- ulpi-io/browse★ 15same name
- ozten/skills★ 7same name
- aantoniadis/skills★ 0same name
- LikeMindsCommunity/agentic-workflow-backend★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository110 other files it gives its agents.
- acquire-codebase-knowledgeSkill
- add-educational-commentsSkill
- agnes-blog-postSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- api-breaking-change-detectorSkill
- api-setupSkill
- architecture-blueprint-generatorSkill
- baoyu-article-illustratorSkill
- baoyu-cover-imageSkill
- baoyu-diagramSkill
- baoyu-format-markdownSkill
- baoyu-infographicSkill
- baoyu-markdown-to-htmlSkill
- baoyu-slide-deckSkill
- baoyu-translateSkill
- baoyu-xhs-imagesSkill
- baoyu-youtube-transcriptSkill
- beadsSkill
- blog-writing-guideSkill
- breakdown-feature-prdSkill
- browser-automationSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- chat-with-pdfSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-reviewSkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- code-simplifierSkill
- code-tourSkill
- cold-emailSkill
- commitSkill
- company-researchSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- conventional-commitSkill
- convert-excel-to-mdSkill
- convert-word-to-mdSkill
- copy-editingSkill
- create-architectural-decision-recordSkill
- create-branchSkill
- create-videoSkill
- critical-code-reviewerSkill
- data-analysisSkill
- data-reportSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- deep-researchSkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- diagram-creatorSkill
- diagram-designSkill
- discernment-nudgeSkill
- distillySkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- doubt-driven-developmentSkill
- ecommerce-visual-copywritingSkill
- file-organizerSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- gh-address-commentsSkill
- git-guardrails-claude-codeSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 11 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
11
Common
Most of the 14 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 43
If output is truncated, read each changed file individually until you have seen every changed line
- Common: line 50
All user inputs (request params, headers, body, URL components)
- Common: line 52
All authentication/authorization checks
- Common: line 53
All session/state operations
- Common: line 75
Check if it's already handled elsewhere in the changed code
- Common: line 76
Search for existing tests covering the scenario
- Common: line 77
Read surrounding context to verify the issue is real
- Common: line 81
Before finalizing, you MUST:
- Common: line 86
Only then provide your final findings
- Common: line 103
If you find nothing significant, say so - don't invent issues.
- Common: line 105
Do not make changes - just report findings.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 14 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Find Bugs
Review changes on this branch for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code quality issues.
Phase 1: Complete Input Gathering
- Get the FULL diff:
git diff $(gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq '.defaultBranchRef.name')...HEAD - If output is truncated, read each changed file individually until you have seen every changed line
- List all files modified in this branch before proceeding
Phase 2: Attack Surface Mapping
For each changed file, identify and list:
- All user inputs (request params, headers, body, URL components)
- All database queries
- All authentication/authorization checks
- All session/state operations
- All external calls
- All cryptographic operations
Phase 3: Security Checklist (check EVERY item for EVERY file)
- Injection: SQL, command, template, header injection
- XSS: All outputs in templates properly escaped?
- Authentication: Auth checks on all protected operations?
- Authorization/IDOR: Access control verified, not just auth?
- CSRF: State-changing operations protected?
- Race conditions: TOCTOU in any read-then-write patterns?
- Session: Fixation, expiration, secure flags?
- Cryptography: Secure random, proper algorithms, no secrets in logs?
- Information disclosure: Error messages, logs, timing attacks?
- DoS: Unbounded operations, missing rate limits, resource exhaustion?
- Business logic: Edge cases, state machine violations, numeric overflow?
Phase 4: Verification
For each potential issue:
- Check if it's already handled elsewhere in the changed code
- Search for existing tests covering the scenario
- Read surrounding context to verify the issue is real
Phase 5: Pre-Conclusion Audit
Before finalizing, you MUST:
- List every file you reviewed and confirm you read it completely
- List every checklist item and note whether you found issues or confirmed it's clean
- List any areas you could NOT fully verify and why
- Only then provide your final findings
Output Format
Prioritize: security vulnerabilities > bugs > code quality
Skip: stylistic/formatting issues
For each issue:
- File:Line - Brief description
- Severity: Critical/High/Medium/Low
- Problem: What's wrong
- Evidence: Why this is real (not already fixed, no existing test, etc.)
- Fix: Concrete suggestion
- References: OWASP, RFCs, or other standards if applicable
If you find nothing significant, say so - don't invent issues.
Do not make changes - just report findings. I'll decide what to address.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

