agentleFS
AgnesAI-LabsAgnesAI-Labs/agnet-skills-cn/acquire-codebase-knowledge/SKILL.md

acquire-codebase-knowledge

Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.

  • Reads credentials

7 other projects use a version of this, 6 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

18 rules. 12 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • 12

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Before finishing, all of the following must be true:

    line 45
  2. Common:

    Every claim is traceable to source files, config, or terminal output.

    line 48
  3. Common:

    Every document includes a short "evidence" list with concrete file paths.

    line 50
  4. Common:

    If the user supplies a focus area (for example: "architecture only" or "testing and concerns"):

    line 66
  5. Common:

    Always run Phase 1 in full.

    line 68
  6. Common:

    Run the scan script from the target project root:

    line 75
  7. Common:

    Quick start: If you have the path inline:

    line 81
  8. Very specific:

    Search for PRD, TRD, README, ROADMAP, SPEC, DESIGN files and read them.

    line 86
  9. Very specific:

    Use the scan output to answer questions for each of the seven templates.

    line 91
  10. Very specific:

    If the stack is ambiguous (multiple manifest files, unfamiliar file types, no package.json), load references/stack-detection.md.

    line 93
  11. Very specific:

    Use [TODO] for anything that cannot be determined from code.

    line 107
  12. Common:

    Run this mandatory validation loop before finalizing:

    line 111
  13. Common:

    If any required section is missing or unsupported:

    line 115
  14. Common:

    No empty required sections.

    line 125
  15. Very specific:

    Generated/compiled output: Never document patterns from dist/, build/, generated/, .next/, out/, or __pycache__/.

    line 139
  16. Very specific:

    devDependencies ≠ production stack: Only dependencies (or equivalent, e.g.

    line 143
  17. Common:

    Use these sections during Phase 2 to inform investigation questions and identify tool-specific patterns.

    line 172
  18. Common:

    Default mode: complete only the "Core Sections (Required)" in each template.

    line 193

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Acquire Codebase Knowledge

Produces seven populated documents in docs/codebase/ covering everything needed to work effectively on the project. Only document what is verifiable from files or terminal output — never infer or assume.

Output Contract (Required)

Before finishing, all of the following must be true:

  1. Exactly these files exist in docs/codebase/: STACK.md, STRUCTURE.md, ARCHITECTURE.md, CONVENTIONS.md, INTEGRATIONS.md, TESTING.md, CONCERNS.md.
  2. Every claim is traceable to source files, config, or terminal output.
  3. Unknowns are marked as [TODO]; intent-dependent decisions are marked [ASK USER].
  4. Every document includes a short "evidence" list with concrete file paths.
  5. Final response includes numbered [ASK USER] questions and intent-vs-reality divergences.

Workflow

Copy and track this checklist:

- [ ] Phase 1: Run scan, read intent documents
- [ ] Phase 2: Investigate each documentation area
- [ ] Phase 3: Populate all seven docs in docs/codebase/
- [ ] Phase 4: Validate docs, present findings, resolve all [ASK USER] items

Focus Area Mode

If the user supplies a focus area (for example: "architecture only" or "testing and concerns"):

  1. Always run Phase 1 in full.
  2. Fully complete focus-area documents first.
  3. For non-focus documents not yet analyzed, keep required sections present and mark unknowns as [TODO].
  4. Still run the Phase 4 validation loop on all seven documents before final output.

Phase 1: Scan and Read Intent

  1. Run the scan script from the target project root:

    python3 "$SKILL_ROOT/scripts/scan.py" --output docs/codebase/.codebase-scan.txt

    Where $SKILL_ROOT is the absolute path to the skill folder. Works on Windows, macOS, and Linux.

    Quick start: If you have the path inline:

    python3 /absolute/path/to/skills/acquire-codebase-knowledge/scripts/scan.py --output docs/codebase/.codebase-scan.txt
  2. Search for PRD, TRD, README, ROADMAP, SPEC, DESIGN files and read them.
  3. Summarise the stated project intent before reading any source code.

Phase 2: Investigate

Use the scan output to answer questions for each of the seven templates. Load references/inquiry-checkpoints.md for the full per-template question list.

If the stack is ambiguous (multiple manifest files, unfamiliar file types, no package.json), load references/stack-detection.md.

Phase 3: Populate Templates

Copy each template from assets/templates/ into docs/codebase/. Fill in this order:

  1. STACK.md — language, runtime, frameworks, all dependencies
  2. STRUCTURE.md — directory layout, entry points, key files
  3. ARCHITECTURE.md — layers, patterns, data flow
  4. CONVENTIONS.md — naming, formatting, error handling, imports
  5. INTEGRATIONS.md — external APIs, databases, auth, monitoring
  6. TESTING.md — frameworks, file organization, mocking strategy
  7. CONCERNS.md — tech debt, bugs, security risks, perf bottlenecks

Use [TODO] for anything that cannot be determined from code. Use [ASK USER] where the right answer requires team intent.

Phase 4: Validate, Repair, Verify

Run this mandatory validation loop before finalizing:

  1. Validate each doc against references/inquiry-checkpoints.md.
  2. For each non-trivial claim, confirm at least one evidence reference exists.
  3. If any required section is missing or unsupported:
  • Fix the document.
  • Re-run validation.
  1. Repeat until all seven docs pass.

Then present a summary of all seven documents, list every [ASK USER] item as a numbered question, and highlight any Intent vs. Reality divergences from Phase 1.

Validation pass criteria:

  • No unsupported claims.
  • No empty required sections.
  • Unknowns use [TODO] rather than assumptions.
  • Team-intent gaps are explicitly marked [ASK USER].

Gotchas

Monorepos: Root package.json may have no source — check for workspaces, packages/, or apps/ directories. Each workspace may have independent dependencies and conventions. Map each sub-package separately.

Outdated README: README often describes intended architecture, not the current one. Cross-reference with actual file structure before treating any README claim as fact.

TypeScript path aliases: tsconfig.json paths config means imports like @/foo don't map directly to the filesystem. Map aliases to real paths before documenting structure.

Generated/compiled output: Never document patterns from dist/, build/, generated/, .next/, out/, or __pycache__/. These are artefacts — document source conventions only.

.env.example reveals required config: Secrets are never committed. Read .env.example, .env.template, or .env.sample to discover required environment variables.

devDependencies ≠ production stack: Only dependencies (or equivalent, e.g. [tool.poetry.dependencies]) runs in production. Document linters, formatters, and test frameworks separately as dev tooling.

Test TODOs ≠ production debt: TODOs inside test/, tests/, __tests__/, or spec/ are coverage gaps, not production technical debt. Separate them in CONCERNS.md.

High-churn files = fragile areas: Files appearing most in recent git history have the highest modification rate and likely hidden complexity. Always note them in CONCERNS.md.


Anti-Patterns

❌ Don't✅ Do instead
"Uses Clean Architecture with Domain/Data layers." (when no such directories exist)State only what directory structure actually shows.
"This is a Next.js project." (without checking package.json)Check dependencies first. State what's actually there.
Guess the database from a variable name like dbUrlCheck manifest for pg, mysql2, mongoose, prisma, etc.
Document dist/ or build/ naming patterns as conventionsSource files only.

Enhanced Scan Output Sections

The scan.py script now produce the following sections in addition to the original output:

  • CODE METRICS — Total files, lines of code by language, largest files (complexity signals)
  • CI/CD PIPELINES — Detected GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI, etc.
  • CONTAINERS & ORCHESTRATION — Docker, Docker Compose, Kubernetes, Vagrant configs
  • SECURITY & COMPLIANCE — Snyk, Dependabot, SECURITY.md, SBOM, security policies
  • PERFORMANCE & TESTING — Benchmark configs, profiling markers, load testing tools

Use these sections during Phase 2 to inform investigation questions and identify tool-specific patterns.


Bundled Assets

AssetWhen to load
scripts/scan.pyPhase 1 — run first, before reading any code (Python 3.8+ required)
references/inquiry-checkpoints.mdPhase 2 — load for per-template investigation questions
references/stack-detection.mdPhase 2 — only if stack is ambiguous
assets/templates/STACK.mdPhase 3 step 1
assets/templates/STRUCTURE.mdPhase 3 step 2
assets/templates/ARCHITECTURE.mdPhase 3 step 3
assets/templates/CONVENTIONS.mdPhase 3 step 4
assets/templates/INTEGRATIONS.mdPhase 3 step 5
assets/templates/TESTING.mdPhase 3 step 6
assets/templates/CONCERNS.mdPhase 3 step 7

Template usage mode:

  • Default mode: complete only the "Core Sections (Required)" in each template.
  • Extended mode: add optional sections only when the repo complexity justifies them.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.