agentleFS
AgnesAI-LabsAgnesAI-Labs/agnet-skills-cn/company-research/SKILL.md

company-research

Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Conduct comprehensive company research and due diligence. Analyze business model, competitive landscape, management, and market position.

31 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use business-health-diagnostic, derisk-measurement-advisor and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • nandanosqlSkill

    business-health-diagnostic

    Run a comprehensive business health check across revenue, unit economics, product metrics, and market position — identifying strengths, weaknesses, and the single most important metric to fix.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • DIAL-StudioSkill

    derisk-measurement-advisor

    Identify what to measure, test, or track to de-risk a product or AI idea. Use when stress-testing an idea across internal (DUFV) and external (PESTEL) dimensions.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • DIAL-StudioSkill

    organic-growth-advisor

    Identify which organic growth path to pursue — new segments, geographies, channels, or products. Use when diagnosing where a growth constraint lives and which McKinsey growth level to act\

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • nandanosqlSkill

    prioritization-advisor

    Guide PMs in choosing the right prioritization framework — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Value vs Effort, Cost of Delay — by asking adaptive questions about product stage, team context, and data availability.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +8 more from nandanosql

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 23 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ask for specific frameworks: if you prefer particular analysis methods

    line 326
  2. Distinctive:

    Does not replace professional due diligence

    line 338

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 23 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Company Research Skill

Overview

I help you conduct comprehensive company research for investment decisions, business development, or competitive intelligence. I analyze business models, competitive positioning, market dynamics, and management quality.

What I can do:

  • Business model canvas analysis
  • Competitive landscape mapping
  • SWOT and Porter's Five Forces analysis
  • Market size and growth assessment
  • Management and governance review
  • Risk identification

What I cannot do:

  • Access proprietary databases
  • Conduct primary research (interviews)
  • Provide real-time data
  • Verify information accuracy

How to Use Me

Step 1: Specify the Company

Tell me:

  • Company name and ticker (if public)
  • Industry/sector
  • Geography focus
  • Public or private

Step 2: Choose Research Scope

  • Quick Overview: 1-page summary
  • Standard Research: Comprehensive analysis
  • Deep Dive: Detailed due diligence
  • Specific Focus: Choose particular aspects

Step 3: Specify Use Case

  • Investment decision
  • Competitive intelligence
  • Partnership evaluation
  • M&A target assessment
  • Market entry analysis

Research Framework

Business Model Analysis

Revenue Model

TypeDescriptionExamples
SubscriptionRecurring revenueSaaS, Media
TransactionPer-transaction feesPayments, Marketplaces
LicensingIP monetizationSoftware, Pharma
AdvertisingAttention monetizationSocial media, Search
HardwareProduct salesApple, Tesla
ServicesTime/expertise billingConsulting, Legal

Value Chain Position

Upstream → Manufacturing → Distribution → Retail → End User
   ↑              ↑              ↑           ↑
Where does the company operate in the value chain?

Competitive Analysis Framework

Porter's Five Forces

  1. Threat of New Entrants: Barriers to entry, capital requirements
  2. Bargaining Power of Suppliers: Supplier concentration, switching costs
  3. Bargaining Power of Buyers: Customer concentration, price sensitivity
  4. Threat of Substitutes: Alternative solutions, switching costs
  5. Industry Rivalry: Number of competitors, market growth, differentiation

Competitive Positioning Matrix

                     High Price
                         │
    Premium              │            Differentiated
    (Apple)              │            (Tesla)
                         │
Low ─────────────────────┼───────────────────── High
Value                    │                      Value
                         │
    Cost Leader          │            Best Value
    (Walmart)            │            (Costco)
                         │
                     Low Price

SWOT Analysis

StrengthsWeaknesses
Internal advantagesInternal limitations
Core competenciesResource gaps
Competitive moatsOperational issues
OpportunitiesThreats
Market trendsCompetitive risks
Growth vectorsRegulatory risks
New marketsTechnology disruption

Output Format

# Company Research Report: [Company Name]

**Ticker**: [If applicable]
**Sector**: [Industry]
**Headquarters**: [Location]
**Founded**: [Year]
**Employees**: [Number]
**Research Date**: [Date]

---

## Executive Summary

[3-4 sentences summarizing the company, its market position, key strengths, and primary risks]

**Investment/Partnership Suitability**: [Attractive / Neutral / Caution]

---

## Business Overview

### Company Description
[What the company does, history, key milestones]

### Business Model
[How the company makes money]

| Revenue Stream | % of Revenue | Description |
|----------------|--------------|-------------|
| [Stream 1] | XX% | |
| [Stream 2] | XX% | |
| [Stream 3] | XX% | |

### Key Products/Services
1. **[Product 1]**: [Description, market position]
2. **[Product 2]**: [Description, market position]
3. **[Product 3]**: [Description, market position]

---

## Market Analysis

### Industry Overview
[Industry description, size, growth rate, key trends]

### Total Addressable Market (TAM)
| Market | Size | Growth | Source |
|--------|------|--------|--------|
| TAM | $XXB | XX% CAGR | |
| SAM | $XXB | XX% CAGR | |
| SOM | $XXB | XX% CAGR | |

### Key Industry Trends
1. [Trend 1]
2. [Trend 2]
3. [Trend 3]

---

## Competitive Landscape

### Market Position
[Company's position relative to competitors]

### Key Competitors
| Competitor | Market Share | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|------------|--------------|-----------|------------|
| [Comp 1] | XX% | | |
| [Comp 2] | XX% | | |
| [Comp 3] | XX% | | |

### Competitive Advantages (Moats)
- [ ] Brand/Reputation
- [ ] Network Effects
- [ ] Switching Costs
- [ ] Cost Advantages
- [ ] Intangible Assets (IP, Licenses)
- [ ] Efficient Scale

### Porter's Five Forces Assessment
| Force | Intensity | Rationale |
|-------|-----------|-----------|
| New Entrants | Low/Med/High | |
| Supplier Power | Low/Med/High | |
| Buyer Power | Low/Med/High | |
| Substitutes | Low/Med/High | |
| Rivalry | Low/Med/High | |

---

## SWOT Analysis

| **Strengths** | **Weaknesses** |
|---------------|----------------|
| • [S1] | • [W1] |
| • [S2] | • [W2] |
| • [S3] | • [W3] |

| **Opportunities** | **Threats** |
|-------------------|-------------|
| • [O1] | • [T1] |
| • [O2] | • [T2] |
| • [O3] | • [T3] |

---

## Management & Governance

### Leadership Team
| Name | Title | Background | Tenure |
|------|-------|------------|--------|
| | CEO | | |
| | CFO | | |
| | CTO | | |

### Board Composition
[Independent directors, expertise, potential conflicts]

### Corporate Governance
- Insider ownership: XX%
- Institutional ownership: XX%
- Governance concerns: [If any]

---

## Financial Snapshot

| Metric | Value | Trend |
|--------|-------|-------|
| Revenue | $XXM | ↑↓→ |
| Revenue Growth | XX% | |
| Gross Margin | XX% | |
| Operating Margin | XX% | |
| Net Margin | XX% | |
| ROE | XX% | |
| Debt/Equity | X.XX | |

---

## Risk Assessment

### Key Risks
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|------------|--------|------------|
| [Risk 1] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | |
| [Risk 2] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | |
| [Risk 3] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | |

---

## Conclusion & Recommendations

### Summary Assessment
[Overall view on the company]

### Key Takeaways
1. [Takeaway 1]
2. [Takeaway 2]
3. [Takeaway 3]

### Recommended Next Steps
1. [Action 1]
2. [Action 2]

---

## Appendix

### Sources
- Company filings and reports
- Industry reports
- News articles
- Analyst reports (if available)

---

## Disclaimer

This research is based on publicly available information and AI analysis. It should not be considered as investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any securities.

Tips for Better Results

  1. Specify the purpose of your research (investment, partnership, competitive intel)
  2. Provide any known information to focus the analysis
  3. Ask for specific frameworks if you prefer particular analysis methods
  4. Request comparison with specific competitors
  5. Indicate depth level needed (quick scan vs deep dive)

Limitations

  • Cannot access real-time data or proprietary databases
  • Analysis based on publicly available information
  • Cannot conduct primary research or interviews
  • May not reflect most recent developments
  • Does not replace professional due diligence

Built by the Claude Office Skills community. Contributions welcome!

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.