ad-review
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
检查视频广告脚本、制作包、生成片段或后期成片的事实、商品一致性、声音与交付质量。用于验收和返工定位;只有脚本时不作成片通过结论,也不推断投放效果。
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- feicaiclub/ad-storyboardertheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- alexandremendoncaalvaro/CorridorKey-Runtimetheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- alexandremendoncaalvaro/CorridorKey-Runtime★ 755same name
- feicaiclub/ad-storyboarder★ 6same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- ad-briefSkill
- ad-creativeSkill
- ad-discoverySkill
- ad-experimentSkill
- ad-gtmSkill
- ad-pocSkill
- ad-scaleSkill
- ad-seedance-20Skill
- ad-seedance-25Skill
- ad-storyboardSkill
The file
Files
广告验收与返工
输入
待检查产物、对应 brief、产品参考、获准文案和交付规格。先确定实际可见材料是文本、帧图还是完整音视频。
方法
- 检查主张来源、价格期限、证言真实性、素材权利、产品禁改项和 CTA。缺证据标为未核验,不能因视觉评分高而通过。
- 文本阶段校验时间轴、素材引用、口播容纳性、后期项和渠道要求;标明尚未观察到的画面问题。
- 实际视频逐段检查 SKU、数量、轮廓、结构、操作接触、空间连续性与品牌识别。记录问题时间码,完整观看声音与口型同步。
- 后期成片检查 Logo、价格、字幕、口播、转场和片尾阅读时间;按实际广告位的当前官方规范检查导出格式和安全区。
- 每项用
not_run / observed / pass / fail,附依据、范围和检查方式。只有截图时只能评价可见帧,音频和时间连续性保持not_run。 - 按阻止交付、应修复、可优化排序,提出最小修改及需复查范围。局部改动也要复查受影响的上下游镜头。
输出
| 项目 / asset_id | 范围或时间码 | 状态 | 证据与问题 | 修改动作 | 复查范围 |
另给本次检查范围内的结论与未完成项。事实错误、商品错误、未获准素材或错误价格阻止对外交付;有关键项 not_run 时不能声称整体通过。
完成标准与交接
每个结论可定位到材料,返工动作可执行。修复后重新检查受影响部分;需要判断广告表现时交给 ad-experiment,制作质量本身不证明转化提升。
示例
只有一份“看起来很完整”的提示词 → 可通过文案结构检查,成片商品保真、声音与运动检查均为 not_run。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

