jot
Skill1 starsChanged 20 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Agent-callable micro-capture at a clean boundary; appends one short marked entry of decisions, corrections and findings to the day's capture file. Costs about one reply. Does not replace or satisfy session-log or session-close.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zahradil/jotpytheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- koloskus/jotbooktheir own version, first seen Jun 7, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- koloskus/jotbook★ 0same name
- zahradil/jotpy★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/agents.mdcCursor rule
- commandsSkill
- daily-dashboardSkill
- daily-reviewSkill
- document-standardsSkill
- merge-proxySkill
- monthly-reviewSkill
- orientSkill
- redaction-gateSkill
- session-closeSkill
- session-logSkill
- skill-creationSkill
- skill-discoverySkill
- surface-regimesSkill
- technical-documentsSkill
- touchSkill
- weekly-reviewSkill
- working-preferencesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 29
Read any file to confirm what it writes.
- Very specific: line 32
Run when compaction is near.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
When to Use
Right after a commit, a dispatch, or a closed decision, when something from the stretch just
finished would be lost to compaction and the person is not about to run session-log. Called by
the agent. The shared rules, marker and placement are in docs/partial-captures.md; read that
first.
What to write
One entry, fifteen lines at most, under ## HH:MM [jot] <what the stretch was>, time from
date. Answer only these, and skip any with nothing in it:
- Decisions and the alternative rejected.
- Corrections. What was stated as fact and turned out wrong, and what corrected it.
- Findings the tree does not hold. Established by evidence, recorded by no file.
These are session-log's first, second and fourth questions. Its open questions and its
where-the-work-stands paragraph are left out on purpose: open questions belong in the flag register,
where touch can put them, and the restart paragraph is only worth writing when a restart is near,
which is session-log's moment.
What it must not do
- Read any file to confirm what it writes. If unsure, write the uncertainty.
- Restate what a file on disk already says.
- Edit anything other than appending its entry. Standing files are
touch's. - Run when compaction is near. Prompt the person to run
session-loginstead.
Scope Pointer
session-log: the person-run capture this is the small sibling of. A jot does not satisfy it.touch: the other partial. It records facts in standing files; this records reasoning.session-close: resets the partial count. Nothing here substitutes for any part of it.
<!--
SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2026 Aidan Naveja
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
-->Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

