agentleFS
AN0099AN0099/toothpaste-kit/skills/monthly-review/SKILL.md

monthly-review

Skill1 starsChanged 19 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Monthly pass over the task board; adopt or reject Someday/Maybe items, recheck long-stalled Waiting tasks, choose archive candidates. The person decides every move. Run after that week's weekly-review, which it does not replace.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run the lane-board command once and read all of it, including the coverage line and the archive candidates.

    line 54
  2. Distinctive:

    Someday/Maybe, decided: Every item in the lane. Propose one of: adopt it into Next, with a quadrant and a concrete next action.

    line 64
  3. Distinctive:

    Waiting, stalled: Every Waiting task that weekly reviews have chased more than once with no change to its blocker, as their notes record.

    line 68
  4. Distinctive:

    Done, archived: Every candidate the tool lists, and only those (rule 2).

    line 74

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

When to Use

Once a month, on a fixed day, after that week's weekly review. Invoked by a person, never by an agent.

Adapting this skill: filenames below name roles rather than literal paths. It assumes the same task queue, lanes and lane-board tool as daily-review, and reads its lanes table from there rather than restating it. It also assumes an archive: a separate store that archived tasks move into with their full record, which the lane-board tool reads when it resolves a dependency, so an archived predecessor that left as reference still counts as complete. CLAUDE.md names the command and the archive. Check the tool's coverage line before starting: this review needs each Someday item's added date and note, each Waiting task's blocker and note, and the tool's list of archive candidates. A field the tool does not print is a reason to extend the tool, not to read the queue by hand.

Why a monthly pass exists

The weekly review keeps the board honest about what is moving. Two things it leaves alone on purpose, because a week is too short to judge them. Someday/Maybe fills and is never read: parking an idea is cheap, and a list nobody reviews stops being a list of options and becomes a place ideas go to be forgotten. Done fills and never empties: every finished task stays in view, and a board that shows everything ever finished hides what is open. This pass reads both, once a month, and is the only procedure that archives a task the board has been holding. (The daily review's trash door is for Inbox items not yet clarified.)

The archive's rules

These hold whatever the person answers, and the proposals in phase 2 never break them.

  1. Nothing is archived except by a review. A tool may list candidates; the person moves them.
  2. A Done task is an archive candidate when no open task depends on it and no open flag cites it. Both conditions are mechanical, so the tool lists the candidates. A Done task the tool does not list fails one of them, and is not proposed. If the review thinks the tool is wrong about one, that is a finding about the tool, reported, never a move.
  3. Age alone never rejects. An idea that is only parked stays in Someday/Maybe however old it is. It is rejected when it is no longer relevant to the work, and the review says what changed.
  4. The archive has two doors. A Done task leaves as reference: it happened and may be cited. A rejected proposal, or a task no longer worth doing, leaves as trash, marked irrelevant rather than done, so the record never claims work that was not performed. Trash never satisfies a dependency. A task that an open task depends on is not proposed for trash; its row names the dependent and proposes resolving that first, by dropping the dependency or rejecting the dependent too, in the same answer. Otherwise the dependent would read as unblocked by work nobody did.
  5. An archived task keeps its full record, with the date it left the board, the review that moved it and the door it left by.

Phase 1: Observe

Run the lane-board command once and read all of it, including the coverage line and the archive candidates. If it fails validation, stop and report the fault. Read the notes of the Someday items and Waiting tasks this review proposes to move; earlier reviews recorded their moves there, and the notes are the only record of how a task got where it is.

Phase 2: Propose, lane by lane

For each step, a short table of proposed moves, one row per task, each with a one-line reason. Do not write anything yet. A step with nothing to propose is one line saying so.

  1. Someday/Maybe, decided. Every item in the lane. Propose one of: adopt it into Next, with a quadrant and a concrete next action; keep it parked, with one line on why it is still worth keeping; or reject it to the archive as trash, with what changed to make it irrelevant (rule 3; and rule 4, never while an open task depends on it). An item adopted here enters Next's order through the next daily review.
  2. Waiting, stalled. Every Waiting task that weekly reviews have chased more than once with no change to its blocker, as their notes record. The weekly review asks whether the blocker is still true; this asks whether the task is still committed work. Propose one of: keep it Waiting, with the blocker restated and a next action naming who takes it; move it to Someday/Maybe, because it is worth keeping and nobody is committed to it; or archive it as trash, because it is no longer worth doing (rule 4: never while an open task depends on it).
  3. Done, archived. Every candidate the tool lists, and only those (rule 2). Propose one of: archive it as reference, or keep it in Done with the reason, such as a task about to be cited by work that is not yet a task. A long list is normal at the first monthly review and is not a finding.

Phase 3: Ask, then stop

Chat output, not a document. End with questions: one per step that has proposals, each accepting that step's table as written, and the person answers exceptions by task ID in prose. Then stop.

Phase 4: After the answers

Apply exactly the accepted moves, in one scripted edit that asserts each task's current lane before changing it, so a task that moved since the board was read fails loudly instead of moving twice. A task adopted into Next takes the bottom rank of its quadrant unless the person names another. An archived task moves to the archive with its full record, the date, "monthly review" and its door (rule 5); a trash entry is marked irrelevant and never complete. Record each move that stays on the board in the task's note with the date and "monthly review". Run the lane-board command again: it must validate, the archived count must rise by exactly the number of accepted archive moves, every dependency on an archived task must still resolve, and none may resolve through a trash entry. Show the lanes that changed. Nothing moves on a task the person did not answer; an unanswered row stays where it was and is listed as unanswered.

Scope Pointer

  • weekly-review: the once-a-week pass. It chases Waiting's blockers, names carried work and reads the Done lane back. A Waiting task it has chased more than once with no change reaches step 2 here; a task it reads in Done reaches step 3 only once the tool lists it.
  • daily-review: the once-a-day pass. It empties the Inbox and orders Next, which is where a task adopted here takes its place.
  • daily-dashboard: the state view. It checks the standing files and working trees against their claims; this reads the board.
  • session-close: updates the standing files at the end of a session. A move made here is already in the queue and does not wait for it.
<!-- SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2026 Aidan Naveja SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 -->

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.