jot
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Toolkit dispatcher for `/jot` — routes user slash invocations to the appropriate jotbook skill (stage, review, ink, pencil, init). **User-triggered only; never auto-invoke.** Auto-staging is handled by `jotbook-stage`, not this skill.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- AN0099/toothpaste-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 24, 2026
- zahradil/jotpytheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- AN0099/toothpaste-kit★ 1same name
- zahradil/jotpy★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- jotbook-initSkill
- jotbook-inkSkill
- jotbook-linkSkill
- jotbook-pencil-reviewSkill
- jotbook-pencilSkill
- jotbook-reviewSkill
- jotbook-stageSkill
- jotbook-templateSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 13
If empty or jots, invoke the jotbook-review skill.
- Very specific: line 14
If pencils, invoke the jotbook-pencil-review skill.
- Very specific: line 28
Before invoking any skill, attempt to read .claude/jotbook.local.md in the project root.
- Very specific: line 42
If the settings file does not exist and the user is invoking anything other than init, proceed with defaults and mention once — at the end …
- Very specific: line 46
User-triggered only: Never auto-invoke this skill.
- Distinctive: line 47
Do not silently invent slugs or jots that don't exist on disk.
- Distinctive: line 48
Do not lecture the user about the workflow at the top of every reply.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/jot
Toolkit dispatcher for granular jotbook actions. This skill runs only in response to an explicit /jot ... slash command from the user. Never auto-invoke it. (Auto-staging after substantive explainers is the jotbook-stage skill's job, not this one.)
Parse the user's invocation text immediately after /jot. Treat the first whitespace-separated token as the subcommand and the remainder as its arguments. Route as follows:
review→ look at the next token:- If empty or
jots, invoke thejotbook-reviewskill. - If
pencils, invoke thejotbook-pencil-reviewskill. - Anything else: ask the user to clarify (
jotsorpencils).
- If empty or
ink→ invoke thejotbook-inkskill. Pass the rest of the arguments as the jot slug (or comma-separated slugs).pencil→ invoke thejotbook-pencilskill. Pass the rest of the arguments as the jot slug or subject (single, or comma-separated slugs). The argument need not match an existing jot —jotbook-pencilwill stage one first when given a fresh subject. Recognize an optional--htmlflag anywhere in the remaining arguments and forward it. Ifpencilis invoked with no argument at all, do NOT default — instead, tell the user the two valid forms (/jot pencil <slug>to draft,/jot review pencilsto review the pencil backlog) and stop.init→ invoke thejotbook-initskill. The skill writes the starter settings file and handles the.gitignoreprompt.link→ invoke thejotbook-linkskill (the cross-link sweep over inked entries). Pass any remaining text as an optional focus slug to scope the sweep to one entry's connections.template→ invoke thejotbook-templateskill. Forward any remaining text as the optional pre-run direction steer (e.g. an existing doc look to harmonize with, or a request for a distinct identity), including an optional--quickor--fullflag selecting the design path; the skill treats the steer as a hint, never a gate, and runs the same way with no argument.stage→ invoke thejotbook-stageskill. Pass the rest of the arguments as the subject phrase.- anything else (or empty) → invoke the
jotbook-stageskill. Treat the full invocation text as the subject phrase (if empty, the skill infers from recent conversation).
Reserved subcommand words: review, ink, pencil, init, stage, template, link. If the user wants to stage a jot whose subject starts with one of these words, they should use the explicit /jot stage <subject> form.
Settings
Before invoking any skill, attempt to read .claude/jotbook.local.md in the project root. Parse its YAML frontmatter for these fields, using the defaults shown when a field (or the whole file) is missing:
jots_dir: docs/jotbook/_jots/
entries_dir: docs/jotbook/
pencils_dir: docs/jotbook/_pencils/
output_format: markdown # markdown | obsidian | html
template_path: (none)
backlog_threshold: 8 # session-start jot nudge fires at this count
pencils_threshold: 3 # session-start pencil nudge fires at this countThe body of the settings file (if present) is optional house-style guidance the jotbook-ink and jotbook-pencil skills should respect.
If the settings file does not exist and the user is invoking anything other than init, proceed with defaults and mention once — at the end of your reply — that /jot init (or /jotbook-init) will write a settings file they can edit.
Hard rules
- User-triggered only. Never auto-invoke this skill. For auto-staging behavior, see
jotbook-stage. - Do not silently invent slugs or jots that don't exist on disk.
- Do not lecture the user about the workflow at the top of every reply.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

