agentleFS
AFK-surfAFK-surf/OpenBridge/.agents/skills/swiftui-performance-audit/SKILL.md

swiftui-performance-audit

Skill430 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Audit and improve SwiftUI runtime performance from code review and architecture. Use for requests to diagnose slow rendering, janky scrolling, high CPU/memory usage, excessive view updates, or layout thrash in SwiftUI apps, and to provide guidance for user-run Instruments profiling when code review alone is insufficient.

17 other projects use a version of this, 16 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. 2 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 2

    Common

    Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 11

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If the user provides code, start with "Code-First Review."

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    If the user only describes symptoms, ask for minimal code/context, then do "Code-First Review."

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    If code review is inconclusive, go to "Guide the User to Profile" and ask for a trace or screenshots.

    line 16
  4. Common:

    If needed, a minimal repro or instrumentation suggestion.

    line 37
  5. Distinctive:

    Use the SwiftUI template in Instruments (Release build).

    line 42
  6. Very specific:

    Use equatable() or value wrappers for expensive subtrees.

    line 70
  7. Distinctive:

    Look for these patterns during code review.

    line 76
  8. Distinctive:

    Prefer cached formatters in a model or a dedicated helper:

    line 88
  9. Distinctive:

    Prefer precompute or cache on change:

    line 106
  10. Distinctive:

    Prefer sort once before view updates:

    line 123
  11. Distinctive:

    Prefer a prefiltered collection with stable identity.

    line 137
  12. Very specific:

    Avoid id: \.self for non-stable values.

    line 147
  13. Very specific:

    Prefer one stable base view and localize conditions to sections/modifiers (for example inside toolbar, row content, overlay, or disabled).

    line 161
  14. Distinctive:

    Prefer decode/downsample off the main thread and store the result.

    line 169
  15. Distinctive:

    Prefer granular view models or per-item state to reduce update fan-out.

    line 183
  16. Common:

    Ask the user to re-run the same capture and compare with baseline metrics.

    line 187
  17. Very specific:

    Add Apple documentation and WWDC resources under references/ as they are supplied by the user.

    line 199

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

SwiftUI Performance Audit

Overview

Audit SwiftUI view performance end-to-end, from instrumentation and baselining to root-cause analysis and concrete remediation steps.

Workflow Decision Tree

  • If the user provides code, start with "Code-First Review."
  • If the user only describes symptoms, ask for minimal code/context, then do "Code-First Review."
  • If code review is inconclusive, go to "Guide the User to Profile" and ask for a trace or screenshots.

1. Code-First Review

Collect:

  • Target view/feature code.
  • Data flow: state, environment, observable models.
  • Symptoms and reproduction steps.

Focus on:

  • View invalidation storms from broad state changes.
  • Unstable identity in lists (id churn, UUID() per render).
  • Top-level conditional view swapping (if/else returning different root branches).
  • Heavy work in body (formatting, sorting, image decoding).
  • Layout thrash (deep stacks, GeometryReader, preference chains).
  • Large images without downsampling or resizing.
  • Over-animated hierarchies (implicit animations on large trees).

Provide:

  • Likely root causes with code references.
  • Suggested fixes and refactors.
  • If needed, a minimal repro or instrumentation suggestion.

2. Guide the User to Profile

Explain how to collect data with Instruments:

  • Use the SwiftUI template in Instruments (Release build).
  • Reproduce the exact interaction (scroll, navigation, animation).
  • Capture SwiftUI timeline and Time Profiler.
  • Export or screenshot the relevant lanes and the call tree.

Ask for:

  • Trace export or screenshots of SwiftUI lanes + Time Profiler call tree.
  • Device/OS/build configuration.

3. Analyze and Diagnose

Prioritize likely SwiftUI culprits:

  • View invalidation storms from broad state changes.
  • Unstable identity in lists (id churn, UUID() per render).
  • Top-level conditional view swapping (if/else returning different root branches).
  • Heavy work in body (formatting, sorting, image decoding).
  • Layout thrash (deep stacks, GeometryReader, preference chains).
  • Large images without downsampling or resizing.
  • Over-animated hierarchies (implicit animations on large trees).

Summarize findings with evidence from traces/logs.

4. Remediate

Apply targeted fixes:

  • Narrow state scope (@State/@Observable closer to leaf views).
  • Stabilize identities for ForEach and lists.
  • Move heavy work out of body (precompute, cache, @State).
  • Use equatable() or value wrappers for expensive subtrees.
  • Downsample images before rendering.
  • Reduce layout complexity or use fixed sizing where possible.

Common Code Smells (and Fixes)

Look for these patterns during code review.

Expensive formatters in body

var body: some View {
    let number = NumberFormatter() // slow allocation
    let measure = MeasurementFormatter() // slow allocation
    Text(measure.string(from: .init(value: meters, unit: .meters)))
}

Prefer cached formatters in a model or a dedicated helper:

final class DistanceFormatter {
    static let shared = DistanceFormatter()
    let number = NumberFormatter()
    let measure = MeasurementFormatter()
}

Computed properties that do heavy work

var filtered: [Item] {
    items.filter { $0.isEnabled } // runs on every body eval
}

Prefer precompute or cache on change:

@State private var filtered: [Item] = []
// update filtered when inputs change

Sorting/filtering in body or ForEach

List {
    ForEach(items.sorted(by: sortRule)) { item in
        Row(item)
    }
}

Prefer sort once before view updates:

let sortedItems = items.sorted(by: sortRule)

Inline filtering in ForEach

ForEach(items.filter { $0.isEnabled }) { item in
    Row(item)
}

Prefer a prefiltered collection with stable identity.

Unstable identity

ForEach(items, id: \.self) { item in
    Row(item)
}

Avoid id: \.self for non-stable values; use a stable ID.

Top-level conditional view swapping

var content: some View {
    if isEditing {
        editingView
    } else {
        readOnlyView
    }
}

Prefer one stable base view and localize conditions to sections/modifiers (for example inside toolbar, row content, overlay, or disabled). This reduces root identity churn and helps SwiftUI diffing stay efficient.

Image decoding on the main thread

Image(uiImage: UIImage(data: data)!)

Prefer decode/downsample off the main thread and store the result.

Broad dependencies in observable models

@Observable class Model {
    var items: [Item] = []
}

var body: some View {
    Row(isFavorite: model.items.contains(item))
}

Prefer granular view models or per-item state to reduce update fan-out.

5. Verify

Ask the user to re-run the same capture and compare with baseline metrics. Summarize the delta (CPU, frame drops, memory peak) if provided.

Outputs

Provide:

  • A short metrics table (before/after if available).
  • Top issues (ordered by impact).
  • Proposed fixes with estimated effort.

References

Add Apple documentation and WWDC resources under references/ as they are supplied by the user.

  • Optimizing SwiftUI performance with Instruments: references/optimizing-swiftui-performance-instruments.md
  • Understanding and improving SwiftUI performance: references/understanding-improving-swiftui-performance.md
  • Understanding hangs in your app: references/understanding-hangs-in-your-app.md
  • Demystify SwiftUI performance (WWDC23): references/demystify-swiftui-performance-wwdc23.md

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.