agentleFS
Sign inStart free
535803710535803710/ai-rd-skills/skills/code-review/SKILL.md

code-review

Skill8 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

代码审查协调入口。根据文件类型和审查目标分发到 code-quality-review、vue-component-review、page-review，并汇总审查结果；当用户要求全面审查、review 代码、提交前检查时使用。

Create a free account to mount
Files
SKILL.md

Code Review Coordinator

目标

统一组织代码审查，不把所有规则塞进一个 Skill。根据改动类型选择专项审查，然后按风险汇总结果。

分发规则

  • 纯逻辑、API、store、utils、hooks：使用 code-quality-review
  • Vue 单文件组件、组件 props/emits、模板和响应式逻辑：使用 vue-component-review
  • 页面布局、表单、表格、按钮、状态反馈、交互体验：使用 page-review

工作方式

  1. 先看用户指定的文件、diff 或需求背景。
  2. 判断需要哪些专项审查，不重复检查同一类问题。
  3. 按专项 Skill 的职责检查。
  4. 汇总时按严重程度排序，问题先于总结。

输出格式

## Findings

- [P1] 问题标题
  - 位置：文件:行号
  - 风险：说明会导致什么问题
  - 建议：如何修

## Open Questions

## Summary

原则

  • 优先指出 bug、权限、安全、数据和测试风险
  • 没发现问题就明确说没有发现阻断问题
  • 不把个人偏好包装成缺陷
  • 每个问题都要有具体依据

Download now (ZIP)

  • Other versions193 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 193

    1. mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
    2. TheAlgorithms/Python★ 226ksame name
    3. microsoft/vscode★ 194ksame name
    4. github/spec-kit★ 145ksame name
    5. ggml-org/llama.cpp★ 133ksame name
    6. shareAI-lab/analysis_claude_code★ 80ksame name
    7. shareAI-lab/learn-claude-code★ 80ksame name
    8. vectorize-io/hindsight★ 57ksame name
    9. dbeaver/dbeaver★ 52ksame name
    10. roboflow/supervision★ 51ksame name

    183 more not listed

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • Used alongsideProjects with it also use close-spec, design-with-images and 10 more.

    Other files people use alongside this one.

    Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
    • dzhngSkill

      close-spec

      When a spec under specs/<feature>/ is done shipping (a write-spec build, or any planned task that produced a spec), archive it to specs/done/ and rewrite it from a build-plan into a durable rationale — the why, the principles, the invariants — pointing back to the real code for the how. Use when implementation has landed and the plan no longer matches what shipped, or the user says a feature/spec is finished. Pairs with [write-spec](../write-spec/SKILL.md) (the plan this closes) and [review](../review/SKILL.md) (run before closing).

      Also in 5 projects that use this

    • dzhngSkill

      design-with-images

      Explore UI and visual design with image generation, then iterate the real implementation against the user-selected concept. Use when brainstorming visual directions, offering mockup variants, or implementing an approved generated design; do not stop at the mockups or the first code approximation.

      Also in 5 projects that use this

    • PydanticSkill

      add-new-model

      Add support for a newly-released language or image generation model in pydantic-ai (e.g. openai:gpt-5.6, anthropic:claude-sonnet-5, openai:gpt-image-2). Use when a provider ships a new model id and you need to wire literals, profile flags, adapters, and tests to recognize it. Handles SDK-lag, gateway list conventions, capability probing, and direct image-model geometry.

      Also in 9 projects that use this

    • transitive-bullshitSkill

      compare-screenshots

      Compare screenshots against the intended design, distinguishing approved references from historical baselines. Use for iterative implementation matching, before/after visual review, objective image telemetry, or checking a lone capture for flat, empty, or badly framed content.

      Also in 5 projects that use this

    • Microsoft AzureSkill

      azsdk-common-apiview-feedback-resolution

      Analyze and resolve APIView review feedback on Azure SDK PRs. **UTILITY SKILL**. USE FOR: APIView comments, API review feedback, SDK API surface changes. DO NOT USE FOR: general code review, non-APIView feedback. INVOKES: azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_apiview_get_comments, azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_customized_code_update, azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_typespec_delegate_apiview_feedback, azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_run_typespec_validation, azure-sdk-mcp:azsdk_package_generate_code.

      Also in 6 projects that use this

    • Microsoft AzureSkill

      azsdk-common-generate-sdk-locally

      Generate and finalize Azure SDKs locally from TypeSpec, including build, checks, tests, changelog, metadata, and version updates by default. WHEN: "generate SDK locally", "build SDK", "run SDK tests", "run CI checks", "validate package", "run checks", "update changelog", "fix SDK build errors", "resolve SDK generation errors", "customize TypeSpec", "rename SDK client", "rename SDK model", "hide operation from SDK", "fix analyzer errors", "resolve customization drift", "create subclient", "update metadata", "update version". INVOKES: azsdk_verify_setup, azsdk_package_generate_code, azsdk_package_build_code, azsdk_package_run_check, azsdk_package_run_tests, azsdk_customized_code_update, azsdk_package_update_changelog_content, azsdk_package_update_metadata, azsdk_package_update_version.

      Also in 6 projects that use this

    • +3 more from dzhng
    • +2 more from Azure
  • In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free